Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and curative efficacy of 2-cycle chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The association of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression with tumor response and overall survival remained controversial. The study was conducted to investigate the association between them in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

204 eligible patients with SCLC were respectively included and categorized into three groups (no, mild, and severe myelosuppression) based on myelosuppression degree after the first chemotherapy. Curative efficacy of 2-cycle chemotherapy was evaluated by the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate their association. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to assess the predictive ability of myelosuppression.

Results

In the fully-adjusted model, mild (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.35 to 18.27; P = 0.020) and severe (OR, 7.22; 95% CI, 1.30 to 72.44; P = 0.046) myelosuppression were positively associated with DCR. However, only mild myelosuppression was significantly associated with ORR (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.30 to 6.14; P = 0.010). Although we observed evidence of increased ORR in severe myelosuppression, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, based on the results of the ROC curve, NRI and IDI, chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression cannot be used as a accurate and independent predictor for curative efficacy, but it can improve overall prediction accuracy.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression was significantly associated with curative efficacy of 2-cycle chemotherapy in SCLC, which could help predict treatment efficacy and guide chemotherapy dosage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request by contact with the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

SCLC:

Small cell lung cancer

ECOG PS:

Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

ORR:

Objective response rate

DCR:

Disease control rate

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

PD:

Progressive disease

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

AUC:

Area under the curve

NRI:

Net reclassification index

IDI:

Integrated discrimination improvement

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A (2021) Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 71:7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun A, Durocher-Allen LD, Ellis PM et al (2019) Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 26:e372–e384. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang S, Huang L, Zhen H et al (2021) Carboplatin versus cisplatin in combination with etoposide in the first-line treatment of small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis. BMC Cancer 21:1308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09034-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi A, Di Maio M, Chiodini P et al (2012) Carboplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: the COCIS meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Clin Oncol 30:1692–1698. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.4905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Käsmann L, Eze C, Taugner J et al (2020) Chemoradioimmunotherapy of inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: immunological rationale and current clinical trials establishing a novel multimodal strategy. Radiat Oncol 15:167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01595-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Denduluri N, Patt DA, Wang Y et al (2015) Dose delays, dose reductions, and relative dose intensity in patients with cancer who received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in community oncology practices. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13:1383–1393. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weycker D, Hatfield M, Grossman A et al (2019) Risk and consequences of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in US clinical practice. BMC Cancer 19:151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5354-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim D, Kim HK, Jeong J-H et al (2020) Lipocalin2 induced by bacterial flagellin protects mice against cyclophosphamide mediated neutropenic sepsis. Microorganisms 8:646. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shitara K, Matsuo K, Takahari D et al (2009) Neutropaenia as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with first-line FOLFOX. Eur J Cancer 45:1757–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocconi RP, Matthews KS, Kemper MK et al (2008) Chemotherapy-related myelosuppression as a marker of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 108:336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S et al (2007) Predictive value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia for the efficacy of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in advanced gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer 97:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerji U, Ashley S, Coward J et al (2006) The association of chemotherapy induced neutropenia on treatment outcomes in small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 54:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yashiki C, Hirose T, Sugiyama T et al (2010) Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and treatment efficacy in limited-stage disease small cell lung cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 37:245–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu K, Jiang M, Xu Y et al (2021) Curative efficacy might be an early predictor of prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer treated with 2 cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. J Thorac Dis 13:1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganti AKP, Loo BW, Bassetti M et al (2021) Small cell lung cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 19:1441–1464. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1%3c207::aid-cncr2820470134%3e3.0.co;2-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blazek K, van Zwieten A, Saglimbene V, Teixeira-Pinto A (2021) A practical guide to multiple imputation of missing data in nephrology. Kidney Int 99:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu X, Zhang W, Yin W et al (2017) The prognostic value of the serum neuron specific enolase and lactate dehydrogenase in small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e8258. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Minami S, Ogata Y, Ihara S et al (2016) Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 7:35–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S100184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moser SS, Bar J, Kan I et al (2021) Real world analysis of small cell lung cancer patients: prognostic factors and treatment outcomes. Curr Oncol 28:317–331. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnstone TC, Suntharalingam K, Lippard SJ (2016) The next generation of platinum drugs: targeted Pt(II) agents, nanoparticle delivery, and Pt(IV) prodrugs. Chem Rev 116:3436–3486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Amable L (2016) Cisplatin resistance and opportunities for precision medicine. Pharmacol Res 106:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Montecucco A, Zanetta F, Biamonti G (2015) Molecular mechanisms of etoposide. EXCLI J 14:95–108. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2015-561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oun R, Moussa YE, Wheate NJ (2018) The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs: a review for chemists. Dalton Trans 47:6645–6653. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt00838h

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang C, Hu X, Wang L et al (2015) Excessive proliferation and impaired function of primitive hematopoietic cells in bone marrow due to senescence post chemotherapy in a T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia model. J Transl Med 13:234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0543-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Han J, Xia J, Zhang L et al (2019) Studies of the effects and mechanisms of ginsenoside Re and Rk3 on myelosuppression induced by cyclophosphamide. J Ginseng Res 43:618–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2018.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Săftescu S, Popovici D, Oprean C et al (2020) Endurance of erythrocyte series in chemotherapy. Exp Ther Med 20:214. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hande KR (1992) Etoposide pharmacology. Semin Oncol 19:3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Donahue A, McCune JS, Faucette S et al (2001) Measured versus estimated glomerular filtration rate in the Calvert equation: influence on carboplatin dosing. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 47:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800000260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L-Y, Cui J-J, Liu J-Y et al (2018) Gene-gene and gene-environment interaction data for platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Data 5:180284. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y, Yin J-Y, Li X-P et al (2014) The association of transporter genes polymorphisms and lung cancer chemotherapy response. PLoS ONE 9:e91967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Demler OV (2012) Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models. Stat Med 31:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4348

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was sponsored by the General Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission (No. H2019029), the Jiangsu Province Six One Project (No. LGY2018054), the “Six talent peaks” high-level talents level B (No. WSN-015), and the 333 High-level personnel Training Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing—Original Draft; SG: Software, Validation, Writing—Review and Editing; JW: Resources, Validation, Writing—Review and Editing; LZ: Data Curation, Writing—Review and Editing; XQ: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Project administration, Project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships.

Studies involving animal subjects

No animal studies are presented in this manuscript.

Studies involving human subjects

The Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University reviewed and approved the cross-sectional study (2023-SR-365). The work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.

Inclusion of identifiable human data

No potentially identifiable human images or data is presented in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 403 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Gu, S., Wen, J. et al. Association between chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and curative efficacy of 2-cycle chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 93, 151–159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04608-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04608-6

Keywords

Navigation