Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of food and a proton pump inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 following oral administration of S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine comprised of FT and two modulators, gimeracil (CDHP) and oteracil potassium (Oxo). This study investigated the food effects on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Oxo, other components of S-1, and their metabolites at different gastric pH adjusted by proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

Methods

Patients with and without PPI were treated with S-1 at 30 mg/m2 twice daily orally on days 1–7 under either fed or fasting condition, and then were crossed over to fasting/fed conditions on days 15–21 with washout on days 8–14 and 22–28.

Results

The study enrolled 55 patients including 27 PK-evaluable patients. For the single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, the administration of S-1 under fed conditions resulted in decreased exposure to Oxo relative to fasting administration. There was a marginal decrease in exposure to CDHP and 5-FU under fed versus fasting conditions, although FT exposure was not altered by food, which demonstrated lack of food effect. PPI administration together with S-1 did not significantly change its bioavailability.

Conclusions

Oxo exposure was reduced under fed compared to fasting condition. To increase the bioavailability of S-1, the administration of S-1 under fasting condition was more effective in the western countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H et al (1996) Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumour selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 7:548–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anttila MI, Sotaniemi EA, Kairaluoma MI et al (1983) Pharmacokinetics of Ftorafur after intravenous and oral administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 10:150–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diasio RB, Harris BE (1989) Clinical pharmacology of 5- fluorouracil. Clin Pharmacokinet 16:215–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iyer L, Ratain MJ (1999) 5-Fluorouracil pharmacokinetics: causes for variability and strategies for modulation in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Investig 17:494–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tatsumi K, Fukushima M, Shirasaka T et al (1987) Inhibitory effects of pyrimidine, barbituric acid and pyridine derivatives on 5-fluorouracil degradation in rat liver extracts. Jpn J Cancer Res 78(7):748–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M (1993) Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats. Cancer Res 53(17):4004–4009

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takechi T, Nakano K, Uchida J et al (1997) Antitumor activity and low intestinal toxicity of S-1, a new formulation of oral tegafur, in experimental tumor models in rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39(3):205–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Kato T et al (1998) Invention of a tumor-selective 5-fluorouracil derivative named S-1 by biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil [in Japanese]. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 25:371–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kato T, Shimamoto Y, Uchida J (2001) Possible regulation of 5-fluorouracil-induced neuro- and oral toxicities by two biochemical modulators consisting of S-1, a new oral formulation of 5- fluorouracil. Anticancer Res 21:1705–1712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 after single administration in human plasma of patients with solid tumors (2001) Clinical Study Report (Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.)

  11. Savarino V, Mela GS, Zentilin G et al (1998) Comparison of 24-h control of gastric acidity by three different dosages of pantoprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12:1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tutuian R, Katz PO, Bochenek W et al (2002) Dose-dependent control of intragastric pH by pantoprazole, 10, 20 or 40 mg, in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16:829–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, ACTS-GC Group et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357(18):1810–1820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9(3):215–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kato K, Muro K, Yasui H et al (2009) The FIRIS study; a phase III trial of 5FU/l-leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as 2nd-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [FIRIS study group]. Eur J Cancer Suppl 7(2):324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G et al (2010) Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol 28(9):1547–1553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshioka H, Okamoto I, Morita S et al (2010) Randomized phase III study of carboplatin plus S-1 compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (WJTOG3605). J Clin Oncol 28:7s suppl; abstr 7530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirata K, Horikoshi N, Aiba K et al (1999) Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug. Clin Cancer Res 5(8):2000–2005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida K, Ikeda K, Yoshisue K et al. (2011) Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis for 5-FU, tegafur (FT), gimeracil (CDHP), and oteracil potassium (Oxo) in the eight clinical studies of S-1 in Western patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 29, (suppl 4; abstr 53)

  20. Peters GJ, Noordhuis P, Van Groeningen CJ et al (2004) The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 after single oral administration to patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 15(10):4072–4076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reigner B, Verweij J, Dirix L et al (1998) Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites following oral administration in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 4(4):941–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

KS and CZ are employees of Taiho Pharma, USA, Inc. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaku Saito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheulen, M.E., Saito, K., Hilger, R.A. et al. Effect of food and a proton pump inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of S-1 following oral administration of S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69, 753–761 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1761-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1761-2

Keywords

Navigation