Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Individual outcome prediction for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We integrated molecular data with available prognostic factors in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) from MDS to evaluate their impact on prognosis. Three hundred four patients were sequenced for mutations in 54 genes. We used a Cox multivariate model and competing risk analysis with internal and cross validation to identify factors prognostic of overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In multivariate analysis, mutated NRAS, U2AF1, IDH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were significant prognostic markers for OS besides age above 60 years, remission status, IPSS-R cytogenetic risk, HCT-CI > 2 and female donor sex. Mutated NRAS, IDH1, EZH2, and TP53 and/or a complex karyotype were genetic aberrations with prognostic impact on CIR. No molecular markers were associated with the risk of NRM. The inclusion of molecular information results in better risk prediction models for OS and CIR when assessed by the Akaike information criterion. Internal cross validation confirmed the robustness of our comprehensive risk model. In summary, we propose to combine molecular, cytogenetic, and patient- and transplantation-associated risk factors into a comprehensive risk model to provide personalized predictions of outcome after alloHCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Komrokji RS (2016) Current state of the art: management of higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 16(Suppl):S39–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D, Ades L, Cermak J, Del Canizo C et al (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 122(17):2943–2964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cutler CS, Lee SJ, Greenberg P, Deeg HJ, Perez WS, Anasetti C et al (2004) A decision analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the myelodysplastic syndromes: delayed transplantation for low-risk myelodysplasia is associated with improved outcome. Blood 104(2):579–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koreth J, Pidala J, Perez WS, Deeg HJ, Garcia-Manero G, Malcovati L et al (2013) Role of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: an international collaborative decision analysis. J Clin Oncol 31(21):2662–2670

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG et al (2005) Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 106(8):2912–2919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gratwohl A, Stern M, Brand R, Apperley J, Baldomero H, de Witte T et al (2009) Risk score for outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis. Cancer 115(20):4715–4726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, Okuno Y, Bacher U, Nagae G et al (2014) Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 28(2):241–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pellagatti A, Roy S, Di Genua C, Burns A, McGraw K, Valletta S et al (2016) Targeted resequencing analysis of 31 genes commonly mutated in myeloid disorders in serial samples from myelodysplastic syndrome patients showing disease progression. Leukemia 30(1):247–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Krauter J, Frohling S, Corbacioglu A, Bullinger L et al (2008) Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 358(18):1909–1918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bejar R, Stevenson KE, Caughey B, Lindsley RC, Mar BG, Stojanov P et al (2014) Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 32(25):2691–2698

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Christopeit M, Badbaran A, Alawi M, Zabelina T, Zeck G, Wolschke C et al (2016) Correlation of somatic mutations with outcome after FLAMSA-busulfan sequential conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Eur J Haematol 97(3):288–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Della Porta MG, Galli A, Bacigalupo A, Zibellini S, Bernardi M, Rizzo E et al (2016) Clinical effects of driver somatic mutations on the outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol

  13. Thol F, Kolking B, Hollink IH, Damm F, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Michel Zwaan C et al (2012) Analysis of NUP98/NSD1 translocations in adult AML and MDS patients. Leukemia 27(3):750–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitelman F (1995) ISCN (1995): an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. S Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thol F, Suchanek KJ, Koenecke C, Stadler M, Platzbecker U, Thiede C et al (2013) SETBP1 mutation analysis in 944 patients with MDS and AML. Leukemia 27(10):2072–2075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thol F, Klesse S, Kohler L, Gabdoulline R, Kloos A, Liebich A, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia derived from lympho-myeloid clonal hematopoiesis. Leukemia 2017: Advance online publication

  17. Korn EL (1986) Censoring distributions as a measure of follow-up in survival analysis. Stat Med 5(3):255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gray RJ (1988) A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 16:1141–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li KH, Raghunathan TE, Rubin DB (1991) Large-sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 86:1065–1073

    Google Scholar 

  20. COX DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34:187–202

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Team RDC (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  23. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND et al (2016) Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 374(23):2209–2221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Koenecke C, Gohring G, de Wreede LC, van Biezen A, Scheid C, Volin L et al (2015) Impact of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System, cytogenetics and monosomal karyotype on outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective multicenter study of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematologica 100(3):400–408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Deeg HJ, Scott BL, Fang M, Shulman HM, Gyurkocza B, Myerson D et al (2012) Five-group cytogenetic risk classification, monosomal karyotype, and outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS or acute leukemia evolving from MDS. Blood 120(7):1398–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Della Porta MG, Alessandrino EP, Bacigalupo A, van Lint MT, Malcovati L, Pascutto C et al (2014) Predictive factors for the outcome of allogeneic transplantation in patients with MDS stratified according to the revised IPSS-R. Blood 123(15):2333–2342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G et al (1997) International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89(6):2079–2088

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F et al (2012) Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120(12):2454–2465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Schanz J, Tuchler H, Sole F, Mallo M, Luno E, Cervera J et al (2012) New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge. J Clin Oncol 30(8):820–829

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Buccisano F, Maurillo L, Spagnoli A, Del Principe MI, Fraboni D, Panetta P et al (2010) Cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic characterization combined to postconsolidation minimal residual disease assessment by flow cytometry improves risk stratification in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 116(13):2295–2303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Trottier BJ, Sachs Z, DeFor TE, Shune L, Dolan M, Weisdorf DJ et al (2016) Novel disease burden assessment predicts allogeneic transplantation outcomes in myelodysplastic syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant 51(2):199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamilton BK, Visconte V, Jia X, Tabarroki A, Makishima H, Hasrouni E et al (2016) Impact of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in patients with myeloid neoplasms carrying spliceosomal mutations. Am J Hematol 91(4):406–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindsley RC, Saber W, Mar BG, Redd RA, Haagenson MD, Grauman PV, et al. (2016) Genetic alterations predict outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood : Abstrac #69

  34. Crucitti L, Crocchiolo R, Toffalori C, Mazzi B, Greco R, Signori A et al (2015) Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome of leukemia relapses with loss of the mismatched HLA after partially incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 29(5):1143–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all patients and contributing doctors. We thank Elke Dammann for the documentation of clinical data.

This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research grant 01EO0802 (IFB-Tx); grants 110284, 110287, 110292, and 70111267 from Deutsche Krebshilfe; grant DJCLS R13/14 from the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung e.V; DFG grant HE 5240/5-2 and HE 5240/6-1; an ERC grant under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (No. 638035); and grants from Dieter-Schlag Stiftung.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Heuser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Christian Koenecke and Felicitas Thol share senior authorship.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 2297 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 140 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heuser, M., Gabdoulline, R., Löffeld, P. et al. Individual outcome prediction for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 96, 1361–1372 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3027-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3027-5

Keywords

Navigation