Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclophosphamide-containing regimen (TCD) is superior to melphalan-containing regimen (MPT) in elderly multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renal impairment (RI) is a frequent complication with higher incidence of infections and an important prognostic factor for survival. Melphalan clearance is renal function dependent whereas cyclophosphamide is renal function independent. We investigated which combination regimen should be selected between melphalan-combining regimen (MPT) or cyclophosphamide-combining regimen (TCD) in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients with RI. Between 2005 and 2009, 157 newly diagnosed MM patients with RI were included comparing MPT with TCD therapy as initial treatment. Seventy-four patients were given MPT regimen, and 83 patients were given TCD regimen. Baseline characteristics were similar between the MPT and TCD groups. Analysis of different cutoff levels between 25% and 75% quartiles using log-rank test determined that glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 40 ml/min/1.73 m2 as the cutoff point, yielded the highest difference in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). The MPT subgroup with low GFR (GFR <40 ml/min/1.73 m2) had poorer response rates than others. The incidence of neutropenia and infection with febrile neutropenia were higher in the MPT subgroup with low GFR than the others (p = 0.016, p < 0.001). Furthermore, mortality due to the infection was higher in the MPT subgroup with low GFR than the others (p < 0.001). EFS was lower in the MPT subgroup with low GFR than the others (p < 0.001). OS was lower in the MPT subgroup with low GFR than the others (p < 0.001). In newly diagnosed elderly MM patients with RI, TCD regimen would be an effective and tolerable treatment option due to the combination of cyclophosphamide independent to renal function and dexamethasone effective for RI

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulbrandsen N, Waage A, Gimsing P, Turesson I, Juliusson G, Abildgaard N, Bjørkstrand B, Carlson K, Dahl IM, Forsberg K, Knudsen LM, Lanng Nielsen J, Mellqvist UH, Nesthus I, Strandberg M, Wisløff F, Fayers P (2008) A randomised placebo controlled study with melphalan/prednisone vs melphalan/prednisone/thal-idomide: quality of life and toxicity [abstract]. Haematologica 93:209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, Merla E, Capparella V, Callea V, Cangialosi C, Grasso M, Rossini F, Galli M, Catalano L, Zamagni E, Petrucci MT, De Stefano V, Ceccarelli M, Ambrosini MT, Avonto I, Falco P, Ciccone G, Liberati AM, Musto P, Boccadoro M (2006) Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 367:825–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Liberati AM, Caravita T, Falcone A, Callea V, Montanaro M, Ria R, Capaldi A, Zambello R, Benevolo G, Derudas D, Dore F, Cavallo F, Gay F, Falco P, Ciccone G, Musto P, Cavo M, Boccadoro M (2008) Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood 112:3107–3114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Attal M, Pegourie B, Renaud M, Harousseau JL, Guillerm G, Chaleteix C, Dib M, Voillat L, Maisonneuve H, Troncy J, Dorvaux V, Monconduit M, Martin C, Casassus P, Jaubert J, Jardel H, Doyen C, Kolb B, Anglaret B, Grosbois B, Yakoub-Agha I, Mathiot C, Avet-Loiseau H (2007) Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99–06): a randomised trial. Lancet 370:1209–1218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulin C, Facon T, Rodon P, Pegourie B, Benboubker L, Doyen C, Dib M, Guillerm G, Salles B, Eschard JP, Lenain P, Casassus P, Azaïs I, Decaux O, Garderet L, Mathiot C, Fontan J, Lafon I, Virion JM, Moreau P (2009) Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. J Clin Oncol 27:3664–3670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, Waage A, Wijermans P, Beksaç M, Bringhen S (2011) Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood 118:1239–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Dixon D (1990) Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. Arch Intern Med 150:1693–1695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Rosinol L, Bladé J, Ludwig H (2008) Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 22:1485–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, Rajkumar SV, Offord JR, Larson DR, Plevak ME, Therneau TM, Greipp PR (2003) Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 78:21–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bladé J, Fernández-Llama P, Bosch F, Montolíu J, Lens XM, Montoto S, Cases A, Darnell A, Rozman C, Montserrat E (1998) Renal failure in multiple myeloma: presenting features and predictors of outcome in 94 patients from a single institution. Arch Intern Med 158:1889–1893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Torra R, Bladé J, Cases A, López-Pedret J, Montserrat E, Rozman C, Revert L (1995) Patients with multiple myeloma requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy, and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol 91:854–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleber M, Ihorst G, Deschler B, Jakob C, Liebisch P, Koch B, Sezer O, Engelhardt M (2009) Detection of renal impairment as one specific comorbidity factor in multiple myeloma: multicenter study in 198 consecutive patients. Eur J Haematol 83:519–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rayner HC, Haynes AP, Thompson JR, Russell N, Fletcher J (1991) Perspectives in multiple myeloma: survival, prognostic factors and disease complications in a single centre between 1975 and 1988. Q J Med 79:517–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, Barth NJ, Davies F, Morgan G, Behrens J, Smith A, Child JA, Drayson MT (2005) Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002–Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol 23:9219–9226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, Simeonidis A, Pouli A, Anagnostopoulos A, Michali E, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA (2007) Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma 48:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, De Zeeuw D, Hostetter TH, Lameire N, Eknoyan G (2005) Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 67:2089–2100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bladé J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Björkstrand B, Gahrton G, Gertz M, Giralt S, Jagannath S, Vesole D (1998) Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 102:1115–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, Abildgaard N, Ahlberg L, Björkstrand B, Carlson K, Dahl IM, Forsberg K, Gulbrandsen N, Haukås E, Hjertner O, Hjorth M, Karlsson T, Knudsen LM, Nielsen JL, Linder O, Mellqvist UH, Nesthus I, Rolke J, Strandberg M, Sørbø JH, Wisløff F, Juliusson G, Turesson I (2010) Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 116:1405–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Palumbo A, Gay F (2009) How to treat elderly patients with multiple myeloma: combination of therapy or sequencing. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 566–577

  20. Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Chanan-Khan A, Leung N, Ludwig H, Jagannath S, Niesvizky R, Giralt S, Fermand JP, Bladé J, Comenzo RL, Sezer O, Palumbo A, Harousseau JL, Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Anderson KC, Sonneveld P, Tosi P, Cavo M, Rajkumar SV, Durie BG, San Miguel J (2010) Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol 28:4976–4984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haynes RJ, Read S, Collins GP, Darby SC, Winearls CG (2010) Presentation and survival of patients with severe acute kidney injury and multiple myeloma: a 20-year experience from a single centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:419–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carlson K, Hjorth M, Knudsen LM (2005) Toxicity in standard melphalan-prednisone therapy among myeloma patients with renal failure–a retrospective analysis and recommendations for dose adjustment. Br J Haematol 128:631–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee CK, Zangari M, Barlogie B, Fassas A, van Rhee F, Thertulien R, Talamo G, Muwalla F, Anaissie E, Hollmig K, Tricot G (2004) Dialysis-dependent renal failure in patients with myeloma can be reversed by high-dose myeloablative therapy and autotransplant. Bone Marrow Transpl 33:823–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the national R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (0920050), and supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A070001).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joo-Seop Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, MK., Chung, JS., Shin, HJ. et al. Cyclophosphamide-containing regimen (TCD) is superior to melphalan-containing regimen (MPT) in elderly multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment. Ann Hematol 91, 889–896 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1401-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1401-2

Keywords

Navigation