Abstract
Purpose
The anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is divided into superior (SB) and inferior bands (IB). Although the differences in length and width are known, the structure of the fibular attachment had not been elucidated. The present study aimed to clarify the differences in the fibular attachment structure between ATFL’s SB and IB using cross-sectional images along the ligament.
Methods
An anatomical study using 15 formalin-fixed ankles was performed. The lateral ankle ligament complex was collected after a longitudinal image of SB/IB was visualized by ultrasonography. The specimens were decalcified and sectioned longitudinally at the center of SB/IB using a microtome. Histological evaluation of the enthesis structure at the fibular attachment of SB/IB was performed using hematoxylin–eosin and Masson’s trichrome stains.
Results
A fibrillar pattern could not be observed in the longitudinal image at the IB level by ultrasonography. The lengths of ATFL’s SB and IB were 20.6 ± 1.6 and 15.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, with thicknesses of 1.8 ± 0.4 and 1.0 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The ATFL’s IB was significantly shorter and thinner than the ATFL’s SB. The fibular attachment of ATFL’s SB had distinct enthesis structure, whereas in the attachment structure of the ATFL’s IB, there were several variations including a type with a narrower enthesis structure than the ATFL’s SB and a type that merged with or wrapped around the calcaneofibular ligament.
Conclusion
The fibular attachment structure between ATFL’s SB and IB differs. Our results could be useful information when performing ultrasonography and MRI diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Please contact corresponding author for data and materials.
References
Alves T, Dong Q, Jacobson J, Yablon C, Gandikota G (2019) Normal and injured ankle ligaments on ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging correlation. J Ultrasound Med 38:513–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14716
Baltes TPA, Arnaiz J, Geertsema L et al (2021) Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in acute lateral and syndesmotic ligamentous ankle injuries. Eur Radiol 31:2610–2620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07305-7
Battaglia PJ, Craig K, Kettner NW (2015) Ultrasonography in the assessment of lateral ankle ligament injury, instability, and anterior ankle impingement: a diagnostic case report. J Chiropr Med 14:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2015.05.004
Cai Y, Li S, Chen S, Hua Y, Shan J (2017) An ultrasound classification of anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury. Open Orthop J 11:610–616. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001711010610
Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Kim DW, Jeong HW, Gwak H (2014) Multibanded anterior talofibular ligaments in normal ankles and sprained ankles using 3D isotropic proton density-weighted fast spin-echo MRI sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W87-94. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10727
Clanton TO, Campbell KJ, Wilson KJ et al (2014) Qualitative and quantitative anatomic investigation of the lateral ankle ligaments for surgical reconstruction procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e98. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00798
Cordier G, Nunes GA, Vega J, Roure F, Dalmau-Pastor M (2021) Connecting fibers between ATFL’s inferior fascicle and CFL transmit tension between both ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:2511–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06496-w
Dalmau-Pastor M, Malagelada F, Calder J, Manzanares MC, Vega J (2020) The lateral ankle ligaments are interconnected: the medial connecting fibres between the anterior talofibular, calcaneofibular and posterior talofibular ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05794-8
Edama M, Kageyama I, Kikumoto T et al (2018) Morphological features of the anterior talofibular ligament by the number of fiber bundles. Ann Anat 216:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.11.001
Edama M, Takabayashi T, Inai T et al (2019) The effect of differences in the number of fiber bundles of the anterior tibial ligament on ankle braking function: a simulation study. Surg Radiol Anat 41:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2133-y
Ergun T, Peker A, Aybay MN, Turan K, Muratoglu OG, Cabuk H (2022) Ultrasonography view for acute ankle injury: comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04553-8
Kakegawa A, Fukushima N, Sumitomo N, Nagira A, Ichinose Y, Moriizumi T (2022) Relationship between inferior fascicle of anterior talofibular ligament and articular capsule in lateral ankle ligament complex. Surg Radiol Anat 44:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02851-1
Kakegawa A, Fukushima N, Sumitomo N, Nagira A, Moriizumi T, Mori Y (2020) Continuous and connective fibers of the lateral ankle ligament complex. J Foot Ankle Surg 59:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.025
Kakegawa A, Mori Y, Tsuchiya A, Sumitomo N, Fukushima N, Moriizumi T (2019) Independent attachment of lateral ankle ligaments: anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments—a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg 58:717–722. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.009
Kemmochi M, Sasaki S, Fujisaki K, Oguri Y, Kotani A, Ichimura S (2016) A new classification of anterior talofibular ligament injuries based on ultrasonography findings. J Orthop Sci 21:770–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2016.06.011
Khawaji B, Soames R (2015) The anterior talofibular ligament: a detailed morphological study. Foot (Edinb) 25:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2015.05.004
Kobayashi T, Suzuki D, Kondo Y et al (2020) Morphological characteristics of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Surg Radiol Anat 42:1153–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02461-3
Lynch SA, Renstrom PA (1999) Treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament rupture in the athlete. Conservative versus surgical treatment. Sports Med 27:61–71. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199927010-00005
Matsui K, Oliva XM, Takao M et al (2017) Bony landmarks available for minimally invasive lateral ankle stabilization surgery: a cadaveric anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1916–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4218-7
Nakasa T, Ikuta Y, Sumii J, Nekomoto A, Kawabata S, Adachi N (2022) MRI appearance of the lateral fibulotalocalcaneal ligament complex injury in the patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2022.01.009
Neuschwander TB, Indresano AA, Hughes TH, Smith BW (2013) Footprint of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 34:582–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712466851
Wiersma PH, Griffioen FMM (1992) Variations of three lateral ligaments of the ankle. A descriptive anatomical study. Foot 2:218–224
Szaro P, Ghali Gataa K, Polaczek M, Ciszek B (2020) The double fascicular variations of the anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament correlate with interconnections between lateral ankle structures revealed on magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep 10:20801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77856-8
Szaro P, Ghali Gataa K, Solidakis N, Pekala P (2021) Morphometric relationships between dimensions the anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament in routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Exp Orthop 8:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00406-2
Szczepaniak J, Ciszkowska-Lyson B, Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U (2015) Value of ultrasonography in assessment of recent injury of anterior talofibular ligament in children. J Ultrason 15:259–266. https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2015.0022
Vega J, Malagelada F, Manzanares Cespedes MC, Dalmau-Pastor M (2020) The lateral fibulotalocalcaneal ligament complex: an ankle stabilizing isometric structure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5188-8
Yang H, Su M, Chen Z et al (2021) Anatomic measurement and variability analysis of the anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament of the ankle. Orthop J Sports Med 9:23259671211047268. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211047269
Yildiz S, Yalcin B (2013) The anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments: an anatomic study. Surg Radiol Anat 35:511–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1071-3
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to medical science so that anatomical research could be performed.
Funding
This study was partly supported by a research grant from Teikyo Heisei University (Grant number: 21THU007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AK: study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. NF: histological experiment, data analysis, manuscript writing. NS, AN and YI: histological experiment, critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that have no conflict of interest regarding this study.
Ethical approval
This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Nagano Prefecture, Japan (Approval No.4340) and Teikyo Hisei University, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Approval No. R01-022).
Consent to participate
Informed consent of this anatomical study was obtained from the families of the donated cadavers.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kakegawa, A., Fukushima, N., Sumitomo, N. et al. Difference in the fibular attachment structure between the superior and inferior fascicles of the anterior talofibular ligament using ultrasonography and histological examinations. Surg Radiol Anat 44, 1513–1520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03049-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03049-9