Skip to main content
Log in

The level of termination of the dural sac by MRI and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block in adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Caudal epidural block (CEB) is a reliable and effective technique commonly used in pain practice. Having accurate knowledge of sacral anatomy and its anatomical variations is very important for avoiding complications, especially as may occur during dural puncture. This study was undertaken to delineate the anatomical features of the sacrococcygeal region relevant to dural sac (DS) puncture.

Methods

We reviewed magnetic resonance (MRI) images of 1,000 adult patients to determine of the level of termination of the DS, the distance between the upper margin of the sacrococcygeal membrane and the DS, and the presence of incidental dural cystic lesions. Each sacral vertebra was divided into three equal portions (upper, middle, and lower thirds), was defined as a separate region.

Results

The level (26.7 % of all patients) of termination of the DS was most commonly the upper one-third of S2. The DS terminated below the 3rd sacral vertebra in 0.1 % of all patients. No posterior sacral meningocele was seen, but 13 (1.3 % of all patients) had a sacral Tarlov cyst. In three of 13 patients (23 %), the Tarlov cysts terminated below 3rd sacral vertebra level (0.3 % of all patients).

Conclusion

Knowledge of the level of termination of the DS, the distance between the upper margin of the sacrococcygeal membrane and the DS, and the presence of Tarlov cysts on MRI images of before CEB is very important and might decrease the risk of dural puncture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra YK, Aggarwal AK, Rajeev S, Sahni D (2009) Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study. Clin Anat 22:730–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crighton IM, Barry BP, Hobbs GJ (1997) A study of the anatomy of the caudal space using magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 78:391–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalens B, Hasnaoui A (1989) Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg 68:83–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Desparmet JF (1990) Total spinal anaesthesia after caudal anaesthesia in an infant. Anesth Analg 70:665–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R (2007) Increases in lumbosacral injections in the medicare population: 1994 to 2001. Spine 32:1754–1760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Joo J, Kim J, Lee J (2010) The prevalence of anatomical variations that can cause inadvertent dural puncture when performing caudal block in Koreans: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia 65:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucantoni C, Than KD, Wang AC, Valdivia–Valdivia JM, Maher CO, La Marca F, Park P (2011) Tarlov cysts: a controversial lesion of the sacral spine. Neurosurg Focus 31:E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lumb AB, Carli F (1989) Respiratory arrest after an caudal injection of bupivacaine. Anaesthesia 44:324–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Macario A, Pergolizzi JV (2006) Systematic literature review of spinal decompression via motorized traction for chronic discogenic low back pain. Pain Pract 6:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Macdonald A, Chatrath P, Spector T, Ellis H (1999) Level of termination of the spinal cord and the dural sac: a magnetic resonance study. Clin Anat 12:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manchikanti L (2006) Medicare in interventional pain management: a critical analysis. Pain Physician 9:171–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Markakis DA (2000) Regional anesthesia in pediatrics. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 18:355–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mulleman D, Mammou S, Griffoul I, Watier H, Goupille P (2006) Pathophysiology of disc-related sciatica. I-Evidence supporting a chemical component. Jt Bone Spine 73:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park HJ, Jeon YH, Rho MH, Lee EJ, Park NH, Park SI, Jo JH (2011) Incidental findings of the lumbar spine at MRI during herniated intervertebral disk disease evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 196:1151–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paulsen RD, Call GA, Murtagh FR (1994) Prevalence and percutaneous drainage of cysts of the sacral nerve root sheath (Tarlov cysts). Am J Neuroradiol 15:298–299

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reicher MA, Gold RH, Halbach VV, Rauschning W, Wilson GH, Lufkin RB (1986) MR imaging of the lumbar spine: anatomical correlations and the effects of technical variations. Am J Roentgenol 147:891–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schuepfer G, Konrad C, Schmeck J, Poortmans G, Staffelbach B, Jöhr M (2000) Generating a learning curve for pediatric caudal epidural blocks: an empirical evaluation of technical skills in novice and experienced anesthetists. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:385–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, Gumusalan Y, Yuksel KZ, Zencirci B, Ezberci M, Kizilkanat E (2005) Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth 95:692–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Slipman CW, Shin CH, Patel RK, Braverman DL, Lenrow DA, Ellen MI, Nematbakhsh MA (2002) Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 3:200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, Johnson D, Mahadevan V, Newell RLM, Wigley CB (eds) (2008) Gray’s anatomy, 40th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  21. Veyckemans F, Van Obbergh LJ, Gouverneur JM (1992) Lessons from 1,100 pediatric caudal blocks in a teaching hospital. Reg Anesth 17:119–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

It is declared from all authors that there is no any conflict interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Ozkan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senoglu, N., Senoglu, M., Ozkan, F. et al. The level of termination of the dural sac by MRI and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block in adults. Surg Radiol Anat 35, 579–584 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1108-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1108-2

Keywords

Navigation