Abstract
In France, “article critique” became a particular teaching method in the second part of the medical curriculum. It approaches a reading exercise of scientific medical papers similar to that of journal club. It could be compared to reviewing a paper as performed by reviewers of a scientific journal. We studied the relevancy of that teaching method for the youngest medical students. Our questions were about the understanding and the analyzing ability of a scientific paper while students have just learned basic medical sciences as anatomy. We have included 54 “article critique” written by voluntary students in second and third years of medical cursus. All of the IMRaD structure items (introduction, materials and methods, results and discussion) were analyzed using a qualitative scale for understanding as for analyzing ability. For understanding, 89–96% was good or fair and for the analyzing ability, 93–100% was good or fair. The anatomical papers were better understood than therapeutic or paraclinical studies, but without statistical difference, except for the introduction chapter. Results for analyzing ability were various according to the subject of the papers. This teaching method could be compared to a self-learning method, but also to a problem-based learning method. For the youngest students, the lack of medical knowledge aroused the curiosity. Their enthusiasm to learn new medical subjects remained full. The authors would insist on the requirement of rigorous lessons about evidence-based medicine and IMRaD structure and on a necessary companionship of the students by the teachers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boon JM, Meiring JH, Richards PA, Jacobs CJ (2001) Evaluation of clinical relevance of problem-oriented teaching in undergraduate anatomy at the University of Pretoria. Surg Radiol Anat 23:57–60
Burrows S, Moore K, Arriaga J, Paulaitis G, Lemkau HL (2003) Developing an “Evidence-Based Medicine and Use of the Biomedical Literature” component as a a longitudinal theme of an outcomes-based medical school curriculum: year 1. J Med Libr Assoc 91(1):34–41
Chevrel JP (1995) The modern teaching of modern anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 17:285–286
Linzer M (1987) The journal club and medical education: over one hundred years of unrecorded history. Postgraduate Med J 63:475–478
Percac S, McArdle PJ (1997) Anatomy teaching: students’ perceptions. Surg Radiol Anat 19:315–317
Percac S, Goodenough D (1998) Problem based teaching and learning as a bridge from basic anatomy to clinical clerkships. Surg Radiol Anat 20:203–207
Phadtare A, Bahmani A, Shah A, Pietrobon R (2009) Scientific writing: a randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line education. BMC Med Education 27:9–27
Turney BW (2007) Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:104–107
Yiou R, Goodenough D (2006) Applying problem-based learning to the teaching of anatomy: the example of Harvard Medical School. Surg Radiol Anat 28:189–194
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Havet, E., Duparc, F., Peltier, J. et al. The article critique as a problem-based teaching method for medical students early in their training: a French example using anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 81–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0911-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0911-x