Skip to main content
Log in

The corticoperiosteal medial femoral supracondylar flap: anatomical study for clinical evaluation in mandibular osteoradionecrosis

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

An ideal way to treat osteoradionecrosis of the jaws is to transfer an osteogenic, appropriately vascularized flap to the affected site. The corticoperiosteal femoral medial supracondylar flap is being used increasingly in the treatment of complex pseudarthrosis of long bones, but is yet to find robust indications for use in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw, the reasons being a lack of anatomical data concerning its vascular supply and the local constraints of its routine harvest. This study presents an anatomical study and literature review to explore its potentials in clinical practice.

Materials and methods

A total of 25 legs were dissected following vascular injection of colored neopren. The descending genicular artery (DGA) and veins were studied with particular attention paid to anatomical variations found in their branches. Calibers and length of the vessels were recorded.

Results

Many anatomical variations of the DGA were found and a classification proposed. The mean caliber of the DGA at the origin was 1.9 mm, and for the vein, 1.8 mm. The mean useful length of the pedicle was 7.9 cm. A case is reported.

Conclusion

A clear anatomical knowledge (and, therefore, a sound classification system to grade flap harvesting potential) is the key first step prior to extensive clinical use of this flap. Various anatomical patterns of the pedicle are frequently encountered; branches can be elusive when raising the flap. Vascular imaging is therefore a critical step in identifying types and subtypes before surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballmer FT, Masquelet AC (1998) The reversed-flow medio-distal fasciocutaneous island thigh flap: anatomic basis and clinical applications. Surg Radiol Anat 20:311–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burstein FD, Canalis RF (1985) Studies on the osteogenic potential of vascularized periosteum: behavior of periosteal flaps transferred onto soft tissues. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:731–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Camilli JA, Penteado CV (1994) Bone formation by vascularized periosteal and osteoperiosteal grafts. An experimental study in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavadas PC, Landin L (2008) Treatment of recalcitrant distal tibial nonunion using the descending genicular corticoperiosteal free flap. J Trauma 64:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choudry UH, Bakri K, Moran SL et al (2008) The vascularized medial femoral condyle periosteal bone flap for the treatment of recalcitrant bony nonunions. Ann Plast Surg 60:174–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Hauthuille C, Testelin S, Taha F et al (2009) Part III: free periosteal flaps as a treatment for mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 110:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dambrain R (1993) The pathogenesis of osteoradionecrosis. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 94:140–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Devauchelle B, Testelin S, Bonan C, Souaid G (1998) Secondary reconstruction after transmandibular buccopharyngectomy with bone resection and after radionecrosis. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 99:22–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doi K, Sakai K (1994) Vascularized periosteal bone graft from the supracondylar region of the femur. Microsurgery 15:305–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finley JM, Acland RD, Wood MB (1978) Revascularized periosteal grafts—a new method to produce functional new bone without bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hertel R, Masquelet AC (1989) The reverse flow medial knee osteoperiosteal flap for skeletal reconstruction of the leg. Description and anatomical basis. Surg Radiol Anat 11:257–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaminski A, Bürger H, Müller EJ (2008) Free vascularised corticoperiosteal bone flaps in the treatment of non-union of long bones: an ignored opportunity? Acta Orthop Belg 74:235–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King KF (1976) Periosteal pedicle grafting in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58:117–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin D, Bitonti-Grillo C, De Biscop J et al (1991) Mandibular reconstruction using a free vascularised osteocutaneous flap from the internal condyle of the femur. Br J Plast Surg 44:397–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marx RE (1983) Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:283–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Penteado CV, Carlioz H (1988) Vascularized periosteal grafts. Anatomic description, experimental study, preliminary report of clinical experience. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74(suppl 2):240–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muramatsu K, Doi K, Ihara K et al (2003) Recalcitrant posttraumatic nonunion of the humerus: 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand 74:95–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ollier L (1867) Traité expérimental et clinique de la régénération des os et de la production artificielle du tissu osseux. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penteado CV, Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Chevrel JP (1990) Periosteal flaps: anatomical bases of sites of elevation. Surg Radiol Anat 12:3–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sakai K, Doi K, Kawai S (1991) Free vascularized thin corticoperiosteal graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:290–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheibel MT, Schmidt W, Thomas M, von Salis-Soglio G (2002) A detailed anatomical description of the subvastus region and its clinical relevance for the subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 24:6–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takato T, Harii K, Nakatsuka T et al (1986) Vascularized periosteal grafts: an experimental study using two different forms of tibial periosteum in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:489–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thurmüller P, Kesting MR, Hölzle F et al (2007) Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral computed tomographic angiography as a planning tool for microsurgical reconstruction in patients who have had operations or radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:543–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trueta J, Cavadias AX (1955) Vascular changes caused by the Kuntscher type of nailing; an experimental study in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br 37-B:492–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM et al (2007) Anatomy and potential clinical significance of the vastoadductor membrane. Surg Radiol Anat 29:569–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yajima H, Tamai S, Ono H, Kizaki K (1998) Vascularized bone grafts to the upper extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:727–735 discussion 736–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yajima H, Maegawa N, Ota H et al (2007) Treatment of persistent non-union of the humerus using a vascularized bone graft from the supracondylar region of the femur. J Reconstr Microsurg 23:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Dubois.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubois, G., Lopez, R., Puwanarajah, P. et al. The corticoperiosteal medial femoral supracondylar flap: anatomical study for clinical evaluation in mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Surg Radiol Anat 32, 971–977 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0658-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0658-9

Keywords

Navigation