Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution of healthy thoracic aortic segment diameter during follow-up of patients with aortic aneurysm or dissection: a magnetic resonance imaging study

  • Radiologic Anatomy
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the normal evolution over time of the diameter of the healthy descending aorta in patients suffering from aneurysm or dissection of the ascending aorta, in order to anticipate potential complications of endoprosthetic treatment in this aortic segment. During their follow-up (average 35.9 months), 52 patients suffering from aneurysm or dissection of the ascending aorta had 168 aortic MRI examinations (2―7; average 3). Measurements were taken according to conventional reference landmarks making it possible to study the evolution of the diameter of the supposed healthy descending thoracic aorta. The variations in diameter with time were on average 5 mm, and there was no significant variation in this diameter, either for early controls or for the controls carried out after more than 1 year or 3 years, whatever the age group. Thus according to our series it seems that patients with a descending aorta endoprosthesis are not exposed to graft endoleak due to inadequate contact of the prosthesis and aorta within the 5 years following its implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonser RS, Pagano D, Lewis ME, et al (2000) Clinical and patho-anatomical factors affecting expansion of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Heart 84:277–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fattori R, Napoli G, Parlapianio M, et al (1999) Endovascular treatment in diseases of the thoracic aorta. Radiol Med (Torino) 98:379–385

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garcier JM, Petitcolin V, Filaire M, et al (2003) Normal diameter of the thoracic aorta in adults: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat 25:322–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg R, Resch T, Nyman U, et al (2000) Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: an early experience with intermediate-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg 31:147–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hager A, KaemmererH, Rappy-Bernhardt U, et al (2002) Diameter of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:1060–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartnedl GG (2001) Imaging of aortic aneurysms and dissection: CT and MRI. J Thorac Imaging 16:35–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashimoto S, Osakada G, Mori T, et al (1995) Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of thoracic saccular aortic aneurysm. The value of transesophageal echocardiography during the course of treatment. Int J Card Imaging 11:241–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho VB, Prince MR (1998) Thoracic MR aortography imaging techniques and strategies. Radiographics 18:287–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohr-Kahady S, Erbel R, Stuhn A, et al (1999) Quantitative detection of change in the thoracic aorta in patients with chronic aortic dissection using transesophageal echocardiography. Z Kardiol 88:507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nienaber CA, Fatori R (2000) Aortic diseases—do we need MR techniques? Herz 25:331–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasierski TJ, Binkley PF, Pearson AC (1992) Evaluation of aortic distensibility with transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 123:1288–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick LM, Militianu D, Cunnings AJ, et al (1997) Direct magnetic resonance determination of aortic distensibility in essential hypertension: relation to age, abdominal visceral fat, and in situ intracellular free magnesium. Hypertension 30:654–659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo JA, Coady MA, Elefteriades JA (1998) Procedures for estimating growth rates in thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Clin Epidemiol 51:747–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robin GD (1997) Helical CT angiography of the thoracic aorta. J Thorac Imaging 12:128–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues Alves CM, Da Fonesca JH, De Souza JA, et al (2002) Endovascular treatment of thoracic disease: patient selection—proposal of a risk score. Am Thorac Surg 73:1143–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimada I, Roney SJ, Farneti PA, et al (1999) Reproducibility of thoracic aortic diameter measurement using computed tomographic scans. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:59–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slama MA, Benetos A, Pannier B, et al (1992) Non-invasive methods in the study of the elastic properties of the thoracic aorta. Effect of isosorbide dinitrate. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 85:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song JK, Kang DH, Lim TH, et al (1999) Different remodeling of descending thoracic aorta after acute event in aortic intramural hemorrhage versus aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 83:937–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Garcier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benachenhou, K., Azarnouch, K., Filaire, M. et al. Evolution of healthy thoracic aortic segment diameter during follow-up of patients with aortic aneurysm or dissection: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat 27, 142–146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0291-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0291-6

Keywords

Navigation