Abstract
Canal companies are adapting automation equipment to assist in the management of their canal systems and provide water to users at a near constant flow rate. Many of these canal companies have been motivated out of need to meet the water demands of their customers while limiting flow rate and depth fluctuations. Several canal automation schemes have been successful, while a few systems have had problems. After studying 179 canal automation projects, key points have been identified that contribute to the success of the automation systems. The most important factor is that the automation system has the support of the board of directors and the management personal. Other factors include a supportive automation company, use of simple, understandable sensors, and reliable equipment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boman BJ, Hill RW (1989) LP operation model for on-demand canal systems. J lrrig Drain Eng ASCE 115(4):687–700
Burt CM, Piao X (2004) Advances in PLC-based irrigation canal automation. Int Comm Irrig Drain J 53(1):29–37
Clemmens AJ, Sloan G, Schuurmans J (1994) Canal-control needs: example. J lrrig Drain Eng ASCE 120(6):1067–1085
Karimov A, Leigh E, Fipps G (2010) Initiating scada projects in irrigation districts. In: Meeting Irrigation Demands in a Water-Challenged Environment, USCID Conference, Fort Collins, Colorado. pp 177–187
Merriam JL, Styles SW, Freeman BJ (2007) Flexible irrigation systems: concept, design, and application. J lrrig Drain Eng ASCE 133(1):2–11
Stringam BL, Esplin BC (2006) Automation of the eastbench irrigation main canal. Int Comm Irrig Drain J 55:395–402
Walker WR, Stringam BL (1999) Low cost adaptable canal automation for small canals. Int Comm Irrig Drain J 48(3):39–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G. Merkley.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stringam, B.L., Gill, T. & Sauer, B. Integration of irrigation district personnel with canal automation projects. Irrig Sci 34, 33–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0477-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0477-1