Skip to main content
Log in

Potato evapotranspiration and yield under different drip irrigation regimes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field experiment comparing different irrigation frequencies and soil matric potential thresholds on potato evapotranspiration (ET), yield (Y) and water-use efficiency (WUE) was carried out in a loam soil. The experiment included five treatments for soil matric potential: F1 (-15 kPa), F2 (-25 kPa), F3 (-35 kPa), F4 (-45 kPa) and F5 (-55 kPa) and six treatments for irrigation frequency: N1 (once every day), N2 (once every 2 days), N3 (once every 3 days), N4 (once every 4 days), N6 (once every 6 days) and N8 (once every 8 days). Results indicate that both soil matric potential and drip irrigation frequency influenced potato ET, Y and WUE. Potato ET increased as irrigation frequency and soil matric potential increased. Comparing soil water potential, the highest ET was 63.4 mm (32.1%) more than the lowest value. Based on irrigation frequency treatments, the highest ET was 36.7 mm (19.2%) more than the lowest value. Potato Y and WUE were also found to increase as irrigation frequency increased. Potato Y increased with an increase in soil water potential then started to decrease. The highest Y and WUE values were achieved with a soil matric potential threshold of -25 kPa and an irrigation frequency of once a day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fabeiro C, Martin de Santa Olalla F, Juan JA de (2001) Yield and size of deficit irrigated potatoes. Agric Water Manage 48:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira TC, Carr MKV (2002) Responses of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) to irrigation and nitrogen in a hot, dry climate. Field Crops Res 78:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman BM, Blackwell J, Garzoli KV (1976) Irrigation frequency and total water application with trickle and furrow systems. Agric Water Manage 1:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y, Wang FX, Liu SP, Lou J (2002) Effects of drip irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and root distribution of potato in North China Plain. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ASAE annual international meeting/VX CIGR WORLD congress. ASAE paper number 022282. ASAE, St Joseph, Mich., USA

  • Kashyap PS, Panda PK (2001) Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region. Agric Water Manage 50:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap PS, Panda PK (2003) Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agric Water Manage 59:49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch DR, Tai GCC (1989) Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Marutani M, Cruz F (1989) Influence of supplemental irrigation on development of potatoes in the tropics. HortSci 24:920–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Opena GB, Porter GA (1999) Soil management and supplemental irrigation effects on potato. II. Root growth. Agron J 91:426–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Phene CJ, Sanders DC (1976) High-frequency trickle irrigation and row spacing effects on yield and quality of potatoes. Agron J 68:602–607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sammis TW (1980) Comparison of sprinkler, trickle, subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agron J 72:701–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal E, Ben-Gal A, Shani U (2000) Water availability and yield response to high-frequency micro-irrigation in sunflowers. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Micro-Irrigation Congress, South Africa

  • Shalhevet J, Shimshi D, Meir T (1983) Potato irrigation requirements in a hot climate using sprinkler and drip methods. Agron J 75:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharmasarkar FC, Sharmasarkar S, Miller SD, Vance GF, Zhang R (2001) Assessment of drip irrigation and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugarbeets. Agric Water Manage 46:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell JT, Gupta SC, Moncrief JF, Rosen CJ, Steele DD (1999) Irrigation and nitrogen management effects on potato yield, tuber quality, and nitrogen uptake. Agron J 91:991–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CR, Pemberton BM, Ransom LM (2001) The effect of irrigation strategies during tuber initiation on marketable yield and development of common scab disease of potato in Russet Baurbank in Tasmania. Potato Res 44:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan BZ, NishiyamaS, Kang Y (2003) Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric Water Manage 63:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study forms part of the work of Project 40125002 supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and Project 40071020 supported by the National Science Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaohu Kang.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Ayars

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, Y., Wang, FX., Liu, HJ. et al. Potato evapotranspiration and yield under different drip irrigation regimes. Irrig Sci 23, 133–143 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-004-0101-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-004-0101-2

Keywords

Navigation