Skip to main content
Log in

Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Small Saphenous Vein Sparing the Saphenopopliteal Junction

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess outcomes after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the small saphenous vein (SSV). Retrospective review was performed of all consecutive EVLA procedures performed over a 39-month period at three neighboring vein practices for symptomatic, duplex ultrasound-proven incompetence of the SSV. EVLA was performed under ultrasound guidance with an 810- or 980-nm diode laser in continuous mode using the pullback method while sparing the deep, most cephalad segment of the SSV near the saphenopopliteal junction. Follow-up after EVLA included patient symptoms, physical examination, and duplex ultrasound. Pretreatment variables were similar across all three practices. EVLA was performed to treat 67 incompetent SSVs in 63 patients (86% women; mean age and 95% confidence interval, 50 ± 3 years; range, 20–82 years). Average energy delivered was 92 J/cm. Immediate technical success and occlusion of the treated vein at 1–2 weeks was 100%. Imaging follow-up length was 243 ± 65 days (range, 3–893 days). Clinical follow-up (243 ± 66 days) showed symptomatic improvement in 66 (99%) of 67 patients; one patient had recanalization with recurrent reflux by ultrasound (2%). Complications included one case of paresthesias lasting beyond 1 month of follow-up (2%) and three cases of superficial phlebitis (4%), but no deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, or other complications. Although ablation involved only the superficial portion of the SSV and spared its deep segment in the popliteal fossa, SSV occlusion typically extended up to the saphenopopliteal junction or to a gastrocnemial collateral, without popliteal vein involvement. EVLA of the SSV is safe and effective when the saphenopopliteal junction and popliteal fossa are avoided. This approach may help reduce the risk of paresthesias or other complications while maintaining low recanalization rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B et al (2003) Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg 38:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Min RJ, Khilnani NM, Zimmet SE (2003) Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:991–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganguli S, Tham JC, Janne d’Othee B (2007) Establishing an outpatient clinic for minimally invasive vein care. Am J Roentgenol 188:1506–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merchant RF, Pichot O (2005) Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 42:502–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Proebstle TM, Gul D, Kargl A, Knop J (2003) Endovenous laser treatment of the lesser saphenous vein with a 940-nm diode laser: early results. Dermatol Surg 29:357–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravi R, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Trayler EA et al (2006) Endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 13:244–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Theivacumar NS, Beale RJ, Mavor AI, Gough MJ (2007) Initial experience in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins due to small saphenous vein reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:614–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caggiati A (2001) Fascial relationships of the short saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 34:241–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Janne d’Othee B, Faintuch S, Schirmang T, Lang EV (2008) Endovenous laser ablation of the saphenous veins: bilateral versus unilateral single-session procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(2 pt 1):211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koizumi J, Horie T, Muro I et al (2007) Magnetic resonance venography of the lower limb. Int Angiol 26:171–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Theivacumar NS, Gough MJ (2009) Arterio-venous fistula following endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38:234–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Timperman PE (2004) Arteriovenous fistula after endovenous laser treatment of the short saphenous vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:625–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson KD, Ferris BL, Polissar N et al (2007) Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous vein: efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg 45:795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kontothanassis D, Di Mitri R, Ferrari Ruffino S et al (2009) Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 49:973–979.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Min RJ, Khilnani NM, Golia P (2003) Duplex ultrasound evaluation of lower extremity venous insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1233–1241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janne d’ Othee B, Langdon DR, Bell GK, Bettmann MA (2006) Operating expenses for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral vascular disease in an academic interventional radiology department: cost calculations according to a microeconomic method. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Susanne L. Loomis, MS, FBCA, for her help in drawing the figure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Janne d’Othée.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janne d’Othée, B., Walker, T.G., Kalva, S.P. et al. Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Small Saphenous Vein Sparing the Saphenopopliteal Junction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33, 766–771 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9806-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9806-1

Keywords

Navigation