Skip to main content
Log in

Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Drug-Eluting Microspheres: Preliminary Results from an Italian Multicentre Study

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the early results of a multicentre trial using HepaSphere microspheres loaded with chemotherapeutic agents for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. From December 2005 to March 2007, 50 patients (36 male and 14 female, mean age 68.4 years) were treated by selective TACE using HepaSphere microspheres loaded with doxorubicin or epirubicin. The diameter of the treated lesions ranged from 20 to 100 mm (mean 42.5; maximum of 4 tumor nodules). Tumor response was evaluated by computed axial tomography according to the World Health Organization criteria as modified by the European Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. All of the procedures were technically successful, and there were no major complications. At 1-month follow-up, complete tumor response was observed in 24 of 50 (48%), partial response in 18 of 50 (36%), and stable disease in 8 of 50 (16%) patients, and there were no cases of disease progression. At 6-month follow-up (31 of 50 patients), complete tumor response was obtained in 16 of 31 (51.6%), partial response in 8 of 31 (25.8%), and progressive disease in 7 of 31 (22.6%) patients. Within the initial 9-month follow-up, TACE with HepaSphere was successfully repeated twice in 3 patients, whereas 3 patients underwent the procedure 3 times. Our initial multicentre experience demonstrates that TACE using HepaSphere is feasible, is well tolerated, has a low complication rate, and is associated with promising tumor response. When complete tumor response in not achieved, additional treatments can be performed without difficulties. Longer follow-up on larger series is mandatory to confirm these preliminary results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma: conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference, Barcelona, Spain, September 15 to 17, 2000. J Hepatol 35:421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kudo M (2004) Local ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. J Gastroenterol 39:205–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Bruix J, Fuster J et al (1998) Liver transplantation for treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: the TNM classification does not have prognostic power. Hepatology 27:1572–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruix J, Llovet JM (2002) Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:519–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llovet JM, Bruix J (2003) Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37:429–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X et al (2002) Arterial embolization or chemoembolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:1164–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raoul JL, Heresbach D, Bretagne JF et al (1992) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. A study of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Cancer 70:585–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis AL, Gonzalez MV, Lloyd AW et al (2006) DC Bead: in vitro characterization of a drug-delivery device for transarterial chemoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:335–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong K, Khwaja A, Liapi E et al (2006) New intra-arterial drug delivery system for the treatment of liver cancer: preclinical assessment in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12:2563–2567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis AL, Taylor RR, Hall B, Gonzalez MV et al (2006) Pharmacokinetic and safety study of doxorubicin-eluting beads in a porcine model of hepatic arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1335–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M et al (2007) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 46:474–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malagari K, Chatzimichael K, Alexopoulou E et al (2008) Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: results of an open-label study of 62 patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Luis E, Bilbao JI, de Ciércoles JA et al (2008) In vivo evaluation of a new embolic spherical particle (HepaSphere) in a kidney animal model. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown KT, Nevins AB, Getrajdman GI et al (1998) Particle embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:822–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ernst O, Sergent G, Mitzarahi D et al (1999) Treatment of HCC by TACE: comparison of planned periodic chemoembolization and chemoembolization planned on tumor response. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kettenbach J, Stadler A, Katzler IV et al (2008) Drug-loaded microspheres for the treatment of liver cancer: review of current results. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 31:468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Osuga K, Khankan AA, Hori S et al (2002) Transarterial embolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma with use of superabsorbent polymer microspheres: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:929–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong K, Kobeiter H, Georgiades CS et al (2005) Effects of the type of embolization particles on carboplatin concentration in liver tumors after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in a rabbit model of liver cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1711–1717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Grosso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grosso, M., Vignali, C., Quaretti, P. et al. Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Drug-Eluting Microspheres: Preliminary Results from an Italian Multicentre Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31, 1141–1149 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9409-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9409-2

Keywords

Navigation