Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Published Information in Reviewing Conservation Objectives for Natura 2000 Protected Areas in the European Union

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protected areas are designated to protect species and other features known to be present at the time of designation, but over time the information about the presence of protected species may change and this should call for a continued review of conservation objectives. Published scientific literature is one of the possible information sources that would trigger a review of conservation objectives. We studied how published data on new discoveries of protected animal species were taken into account by the nature conservation authorities in updating species lists of Natura 2000 sites in the European Union, which are the basis for conservation planning at the site-level. Over the period studied (2000–2011) only 40 % of published new protected species records were recognized by the authorities. The two main reasons for this seem to be a reliance on other sources of information by authorities and the difficulty in finding relevant information in scientific papers. The latter is because published faunistic information is very fragmented among different journals, and often insufficient in details. We recommend better cooperation between authors, publishers, and nature conservation authorities in terms of information presentation, publishing policy, and a regular review of published information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano T, Sutherland W (2013) Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20122649. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando AW (1999) Waiting to be protected under the Endangered Species Act: the political economy of regulatory delay. J Law Econ 42:29–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisby FA (2000) The quite revolution: biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science 289:2309–2312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boldogh G (2006) The bat fauna of the Aggtelek National Park and its surroundings (Hungary). Vespertilio 9–10:33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P (2012) Habitats directive species lists: urgent need of revision. Insect Conserv Divers 5:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyne R (2002) De nauwe korfslak Vertigo angustior in Nederland. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen 16:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Eben M (2006) Public participation during site selection for Natura 2000 in Germany: the Bavarian case., Environmental Science and Engineering. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resource management. Part IIISpringer, Berlin, pp 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) The EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. European Commission, Luxembourg

  • European Commission (2011b) Commission implementing decision of 11 July 2011 concerning a site information format for Natura 2000 sites (notified under document C (2011) 4892). Off J Eur Union L 198:39–70

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012a) Commission note on the setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 sites. https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/jsp/extension/wai/navigation/container.jsp. Accessed 11 Dec 2012

  • European Commission (2012b) Environment: EU celebrates 20 years of LIFE and nature protection. Press Release 23 Oct 2012. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1134_en.htm. Accessed: 5 Feb 2013

  • European Environment Agency (2012a) Reference portal for Natura 2000. http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Natura_2000/reference_portal. Accessed 12 Dec 2012

  • European Environment Agency (2012b) Protected areas in Europe—an overview. EEA Report No5/2012, Copenhagen

  • Evans D (2012) Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nat Conserv 1:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Nagy A, Cantu-Salazar L, Johnson M (2008) Protected areas in Europe. Principle and practice. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goverse E, Smit GFJ, Zuijderwijk A, van der Muij T (2006) The national amphibian monitoring program in the Netherlands and Natura 2000. Herpetolo Bonn II:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry P-Y, Lengyel S, Nowicki P, Julliard R, Clobert J, Celik T (2008) Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: potential benefits and methods. Biodivers Conserv 17:3357–3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioja CI, Patroescu M, Rozylowicz L, Popescu VD, Verghelet M, Zotta MI, Felciuc M (2010) The efficacy of Romania’s protected areas network in conserving biodiversity. Biol Conserv 143:2468–2476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantke K, Schleupner C, Schneider UA (2011) Gap analysis of European wetland species: priority regions for expanding the Natura 2000 network. Biodivers Conserv 20:581–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Benes J, Cizek O, Kopecek F, Konvicka O, Vitaz L (2008) How too much care kills species: grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone from its former stronghold. J Insect Conserv 12:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruk RW, De Blust G., Van Apeldoorn RC; Bouwma IM; Sier ARJ (2010) NATURA2000: Information and communication on the designation and management of Natura2000 sites: summary main report 2: organizing the management in 27 EU Member States. Rapporten van het Instituut voor Natuur-en Bosonderzoek, 2010 (28). INBO, Brussel, 33 pp

  • Louette G, Adriaens D, Adriaens P, Anselin A, Devos K, Sannen K, Van Landyt W, Paelinckx D, Hoffmann P (2011) Bridging the gap between the Natura 2000 regional conservation status and local conservation objectives. J Nat Conserv 19:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano FD, Atkins KZ, Moreno Saiz JC, Sims AE, Dixon K (2013) The nature of threat category changes in three Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots. Biol Conserv 157:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Collins, S, Munguira ML, Sasic M, Settele J, Van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2013) Not the right time to amend the Annexes of the European Habitats Directive. Conserv Lett. doi:10.1111/conl.12030

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehtala J, Vuorisalo T (2007) Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success. Eur Environ 17:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann OP (1998) The need for management of nature conservation sites designated under Natura 2000. J Appl Ecol 35:968–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JD, Braun DP, Unnasch RS (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 53:851–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilate D (2004) Vertigo moulinsiana in Latvia. Acta Univ Latviensis Biol 676:127–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione A (2006) Impact of Natura 2000 sites on environmental licensing. Italian Report. EUFSE, Helsinki 15–16 Sep 2006. www.eufje/uploads. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

  • R Development Core Team (2012). http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

  • Romano A, Montinaro G, Mattocia M, Sbordoni V (2007) Amphibians of the Aurunci Mountains (Latium, Central Italy), Checklist and conservation guidelines. Acta Herpetol 2:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalici M, Gilbertini G (2007) Feeding habits of the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in a brook in Latium (central Italy). Ital J Zool 74:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabetsberger R, Jehle R, Maletzky A, Pesta J, Sztatecsny M (2004) Delineation of terrestrial reserves for amphibians: post-breeding migrations of Italian crested newts (Triturus c. carnifex) at high altitude. Biol Conserv 117:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeller DS, Hernry P-Y, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F, Lengyel S, Nowicki P, Deri E, Budrys E, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Settele J, Van Swaay C, Kobler A, Babij V, Papastergiadou E, Henle K (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol 23:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siivonen Y, Wermundsen T (2008) Distribution and foraging of bats in northern Finland: Myotis daubentonii occurs north of the Arctic Circle. Vespertilio 12:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strugariu A, Sos T, Gherghel I, Ghira I, Sahlean TC, Puscasu I, Hutuleac-Volosciuc MV (2008) Distribution and current status of the herpetofauna from the northern Macin mountains area (Tulcea county, Romania). Analele Stiintifice ale Universitati AI.I.Cuza Iasi s. Biol Anim 54:191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundseth K, Creed P (2008) Natura 2000: protecting Europe’s biodiversity. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartally A, Varga Z (2008) Host and use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian basin. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 54:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Tear TH, Scott JM, Hayward PH, Griffiths B (1995) Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data? Conserv Biol 9:182–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk G (2006) Dytiscus latissimus after 38 years rediscovered in the Netherlands in 2005. Nederlandse Faunistiche Mededelingen 24:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesson C, Brewer PW, Sutton T, Caithness N, Pahwa JS, Burgess M, Gray WA, White RJ, Jones AC, Bisby FA, Culham A (2007) How global is the global biodiversity information facility? PLoS One 2(11):e1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zografou K, Sfenthourakis S, Pullin A, Kati V (2009) On the surrogate value of red-listed butterflies for butterflies and grasshoppers: a case study in Grammos site of Natura 2000, Greece. J Insect Conserv 13:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection and analysis was supported within a framework of the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity of the European Environment Agency. We thank Mora Aronsson, Marita Arvela, Michael Hosek, Ilona Mendzina, Dominique Richard, Carlos Romao, Frank Vassen, and Zita Zsembery for useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Bruno Opermanis helped with R. We thank the three referees for valuable suggestions on manuscript improvement. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be taken as views of the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otars Opermanis.

Appendix

Appendix

List of journals which were systematically searched for this study (publishing authority in brackets)

Acta Chiropterologica (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences)

Acta Entomologica Slovenica (Slovenian Entomological Society)

Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae (National Museum Prague)

Acta Herpetologica (Firenze University)

Acta Ichthyologica et Pisatoria (West Pomeranean University of Technology)

Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae (Czech Zoological Society)

Acta Theriologica (Polish Academy of Sciences)

Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology (University of Latvia)

Acta Zoologica Bulgarica (Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research)

Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae (Hungarian Natural History Museum/Biological section of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Acta Zoologica Lituanica (Institute of Ecology/Nature Research Centre)

Annales Zoologica Cracoviensia (Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences)

Annales Zoologici (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences)

Beitrage zur Entomofaunistik (Austrian Socitety for Entomofaunistics)

Biharean Biologist (University of Oradea)

Biologia Bratislava (Slovak Academy of Sciences)

Bonn Zoological Bulletin (Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig)

Bulletin de la Société Herpétologique de France (Herpetological Society of France)

Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society (Irish Biogeographical Society)

Cynthia (Catalan Butterfly Monitoring Scheme)

Entomologia Hellenica (Hellenic Entomological Society)

Entomologica Fennica (Entomological Society of Finland)

Entomologische Berichten (Netherlands Entomological Society)

Entomologisk Tidskrift (Swedish Entomological Society)

European Journal of Entomology (Czech Entomological Society)

Faunistische Abhandlungen (Museum of Zoology, Dresden)

Fragmenta Faunistica (Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences)

Folia Malacologica (Association of Polish Malacologists)

Folia Zoologica (Institute of Vertebrate Biology (Brno))

Graelsia (National Museum of Natural Sciences, Madrid)

Gredleriana (South Tyrol Nature Museum)

Herpetozoa (Austrian Herpetological Society)

Hystrix (Italian Theriological Association)

Insect Conservation and Diversity (Royal Entomological Society)

Italian Journal of Zoology (Italian Society of Zoologists)

Journal of Insect Conservation (Springer)

Journal of Conchology (The Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland)

Latvijas entomologs (Latvian Entomological Society)

Lynx (Natural History Museum, Prague)

Mammalia (De Gruyter)

Malacologica Bohemoslovaca (Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences)

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft (German Malacozoological Society)

Mollusca (Museum of Zoology, Dresden)

Natura Sloveniae (Ljubljana Biotechnical Faculty/National Institute of Biology)

Natura Somogyensis (Somogy County Museums)

Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen (Naturalis Biodiversity Center)

New and Rare for Lithuania Insect Species Records and Descriptions (Lithuanian Entomological Society)

North-Western Journal of Zoology (University of Oradea)

Oryx (Flora and Fauna International)

Phegea (Flemish Entomological Society)

Salamandra (German Society for Herpetology)

Silva Gambreta (Sumava National Park)

Small Carnivore Conservation Newsletter (IUCN, Species Survival Commission)

Tentacle (IUCN/SSC Specialist Group)

Tiscia (Tisza Research Committee, University of Szeged)

Travaux du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (‘Grigore Antipa’ National Museum of Natural History, Bucharest)

Vertebrate Zoology/Zoologische Abhandlungen (Senckenberg Nature Research Society)

Vespertilio (Czech Society for Bat Conservation)

Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus dem Niederosterreichischen Landesmuseum (State Museum of Lower Austria)

Zoologische Mededelingen (Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opermanis, O., MacSharry, B., Bailly-Maitre, J. et al. The Role of Published Information in Reviewing Conservation Objectives for Natura 2000 Protected Areas in the European Union. Environmental Management 53, 702–712 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0212-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0212-8

Keywords

Navigation