Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial Analysis of Soil Salinity and Soil Structural Stability in a Semiarid Region of New South Wales, Australia

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salt-affected soils are a major threat to agriculture especially in the semiarid regions of the world. The effective management of these soils requires adequate understanding of not only how water and, hence, solutes are transported within the soil, but also how soil salinity and sodicity spatially interact to determine soil structural breakdown. For sustainable agricultural production, information on quantitative soil quality, such as salinity, is required for effective land management and environmental planning. In this study, quantitative methods for mapping indicators of soil structural stability, namely salinity and sodicity, were developed to assess the effect of these primary indicators on soil structural breakdown. The current levels of soil salinity, as measured by electrical conductivity (EC) of the soil/water suspension, soil sodicity, represented by exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and aggregate stability, were assessed. Remote sensing, geographical information system (GIS), and geostatistical techniques—primarily regression-kriging and indicator-kriging—were used to spatially predict the soil sodicity and salinity. The patterns of salinity (EC) and sodicity (ESP > 5%) were identified. The effect of land use on these soil quality indicators was found to be minimal. Co-spatial patterns were elucidated between sodic soils (defined by ESP > 5%) and highly probable mechanically dispersive soils predicted from indicator-kriging of ASWAT scores. It was established that the incorporation of EC with ESP into an objective index, called electrolyte stability index (ESI = ESP/EC), gave a good indication of soil dispersion, although the threshold ESI value below which effective structural breakdown might occur is 0.025, which is twice as small as the expected 0.05. The discrepancies between ESI and ASWAT scores suggest that other soil factors than salinity and sodicity are affecting soil structural breakdown. This calls for further investigation. The study provides valuable information in the form of risk zones of soil structural breakdown for land management. These zones, with a probability of mechanical soil dispersion of >0.70, require immediate management attention with greater monitoring and amelioration techniques, particularly gypsum or lime application and/or altered cultivation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldakheel Y, Elprince AM, Al-Hussaini AI (2005) Mapping of salt-affected soils of irrigated lands in arid regions using remote sensing and GIS. 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST 2005) June 09–11, 2005 Istanbul, Turkey

  • BRS (1998) Bureau of Rural Sciences after Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (1991) Digital Atlas of Australian Soils. Available online http://www.brsgovau/data/datasets

  • Cass A, Sumner ME (1982) Soil pore structural stability and in irrigation water quality: empirical sodium stability model. Soil Science Society Proceedings 51:860–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass A, Walker RR, Fitzpatrick RW (1995) Vineyard Soil Degradation by salt accumulation and the effects on wine performance. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Wine Industry Tech Conference, 16–19 July 1995, Adelaide, South Australia

  • Crescimanno G, Iovino M, Provenzano G (1995) Influence of salinity and sodicity on soil structural and hydraulic characteristics. Soil Science Society of American Journal 59:1701–1708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day K, Loi J, Christianos N (1995) Sodic soils: their characteristics and influence on the development of the Burdekin River Irrigation Area, North Queensland. In: Naidu R, Sumner ME, Rengasamy P (eds) Australian sodic soils: distribution, properties and management. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty W, Anderson A (2001) Sodic soils: their properties and management. In: Cattle SR, George BH (eds) Describing, analysing and managing our soil. The University of Sydney and the Australian Soil Science Society Inc., (NSW Branch), pp. 105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS (1999) Field guide, 5th edn. ERDAS, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2003) ArcInfo/ArcGIS 8.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California http://www.esri.com

  • Field DJ, McKenzie DC, Koppi AJ (1997) Development of an improved Vertisol stability test for SOILpak. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35:843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA (1995) Salinisation of land and water resources: human causes, extent, management and case studies. University of NSW Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell RF (1996) The Australian soil classification Australian soil and land survey handbook. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MM, Navarro-Pedreno J, Garcıa-Sanchez E, Mateu J, Juan P (2004) Spatial dynamics of soil salinity under arid and semi-arid conditions: geological and environmental implications. Environmental Geology 45:448–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loveday J, Pyle J (1973) The Emerson dispersion test and its relationship to hydraulic conductivity. CSIRO Division of Soils Technical Paper No 15

  • McBratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Odeh IOA, Bishop TFA, Dunbar MS, Shatar TM (2000) An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderm 97:293–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre DS (1979) Exchangeable sodium, sub-plasticity and hydraulic conductivity of some Australian soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 17:115–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie DC (1998) SOILpak for cotton growers, 3rd edn. NSW Agriculture, Orange

  • Northcote KH (1979) A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils, 4th edn. Rellim Technical Publications, Adelaide

  • Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2000) Using AVHRR images for spatial prediction of clay content in the lower Namoi Valley of eastern Australia. Geoderma 97:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeh IOA, McBratney AB, Chittleborough DJ (1995) Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotropic kriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma 67:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster JD, Shainberg I, Abrol IP (1996) Reclamation of salt-affected soil. In: Agassi M (ed) Soil erosion, conservation and rehabilitation. Marcel Dekkar, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt PF, Suarez DL (1990) Irrigation water quality assessments. In: Tanji KK (ed) Agricultural salinity assessment and management ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice 71. American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, pp. 220–236

  • Quirk JP (1994) Inter-particle forces: a basis for the interpretation of soil physical behaviour. Advances in Agronomy 53:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk JP, Schofield RK (1955) The effect of electrolyte concentration on soil permeability. Journal of Soil Science 6:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengasamy P, Ollson KA (1991) Sodicity and soil structure. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29:935–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rengasamy P, Sumner ME (1998) Processes involved in sodic behaviour. In: R Naidu ME Sumner, Rengasamy P (eds) Australian sodic soils: distribution, properties and management. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1995) Statistics and graphics guide: version 31 of JMP. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shainberg I, Letey J (1984) Response of soils to sodic and saline conditions. Hilgardia 52:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MJ, Janitzky P, Blackard J (1982) The influence of exchangeable sodium percentage on soil erodibility. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46:117–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2003) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 9th edn. USDA Natural Conservation Service

  • Sumner ME (1993) Sodic soils: new perspectives. Australian Journal of Soil Research 5:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker BM, Beatty HJ (1974) Methods for analysis of irrigated soils, exchange cations and cation exchange capacity. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agric Hanb No 60, USDA US Gov Print Off, Washington, DC p. 160

  • Warr B, Odeh IOA, Oliver M (2002) Geostatistical estimation and simulation of the lateral and vertical extent of soil horizons. In: Foody G, Atkinson P (eds) Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS. Wiley & Sons, pp. 223–242

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chester, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly acknowledge the Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre and the Cotton Research and Development Corporation for providing financial support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inakwu O. A. Odeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odeh, I.O.A., Onus, A. Spatial Analysis of Soil Salinity and Soil Structural Stability in a Semiarid Region of New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Management 42, 265–278 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9100-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9100-z

Keywords

Navigation