Skip to main content
Log in

Response to the Comment on “Is Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Superior to Sonography in Gynecomastia Evaluation and Surgery Planning”

  • Response to Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chief aim of this paper is to response to the comment on “Is breast magnetic resonance imaging superior to sonography in gynecomastia evaluation and surgery planning” and reiterate the merit of breast MRI in gynecomastia treatment for its ability to improve our understanding of the anatomical structure of gynecomastia, which, in turn, aids in refining our surgical approach. All preliminary results shed light on the objective superiority of MRI over physical examination and sonography in evaluating the tissue components of gynecomastia. However, due to the inferiority of MRI over ultrasound in terms of cost, time consumption and accessibility, there is still a significant amount of progress to be made before MRI could be widely popularized.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Matarasso A (2000) Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2604–2607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xia ZN, Kang YB, Yang YY, Guan A, Ma XD, Zhang YW, Liu ZF, Yu NZ, Zhang MZ, Zhu L (2023) Reproducible, minimally invasive and safe: comprehensive aesthetic corrections of gynecomastia. Asian J Surg 47:222–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia Z, Ding N, Kang Y, Guan A, Wen J, Ma X, Liu Z, Yu N, Kong L, Zhu L (2023) Is breast magnetic resonance imaging superior to sonography in gynecomastia evaluation and surgery planning. Aesthet Plast Surg 47:1759–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZX and XZ wrote the manuscript. LZ oversaw and took leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Z., Zhang, X. & Zhu, L. Response to the Comment on “Is Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Superior to Sonography in Gynecomastia Evaluation and Surgery Planning”. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03848-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03848-y

Navigation