Abstract
The chief aim of this paper is to response to the comment on “Is breast magnetic resonance imaging superior to sonography in gynecomastia evaluation and surgery planning” and reiterate the merit of breast MRI in gynecomastia treatment for its ability to improve our understanding of the anatomical structure of gynecomastia, which, in turn, aids in refining our surgical approach. All preliminary results shed light on the objective superiority of MRI over physical examination and sonography in evaluating the tissue components of gynecomastia. However, due to the inferiority of MRI over ultrasound in terms of cost, time consumption and accessibility, there is still a significant amount of progress to be made before MRI could be widely popularized.
Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
References
Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575
Matarasso A (2000) Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2604–2607
Xia ZN, Kang YB, Yang YY, Guan A, Ma XD, Zhang YW, Liu ZF, Yu NZ, Zhang MZ, Zhu L (2023) Reproducible, minimally invasive and safe: comprehensive aesthetic corrections of gynecomastia. Asian J Surg 47:222–228
Xia Z, Ding N, Kang Y, Guan A, Wen J, Ma X, Liu Z, Yu N, Kong L, Zhu L (2023) Is breast magnetic resonance imaging superior to sonography in gynecomastia evaluation and surgery planning. Aesthet Plast Surg 47:1759–1770
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZX and XZ wrote the manuscript. LZ oversaw and took leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, Z., Zhang, X. & Zhu, L. Response to the Comment on “Is Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Superior to Sonography in Gynecomastia Evaluation and Surgery Planning”. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03848-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03848-y