Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PMMA Safety for Facial Filling: Review of Rates of Granuloma Occurrence and Treatment Methods

  • Original Article
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PMMA is composed of microspheres suspended in bovine collagen. Once injected in a dermal area, the carrier is absorbed, giving place to collagen that gives volume and maintains the spheres in the place. This process may give origin to exacerbate foreign body reaction and granuloma. The frequency of such complication is not clear. The primary objective was to review and compare the frequencies of granuloma between the published studies. The secondary aim was to compare the therapies and efficacies. The series of cases in which PMMA was used as facial filler were reviewed, and the rate of granulomas was compared; the case report studies describing those complications were also reviewed, and the therapies and outcomes were quantified. The data showed general frequency of PMMA-related complications of 4.9% and granulomas 1.9%; the incidence of granuloma was 1/2075 patients-year, and the time to development ranged from 6 to 180 months. The most used therapies were steroid, surgery or both, with satisfactory results. In conclusion, considering the actual risks and benefits of PMMA, we may affirm that it is a safe filler; doctors and patients must be conscious of potential risks when deciding for its use.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greco TM, Antunes MB, Yellin SA (2012) Injectable fillers for volume replacement in the aging face. Facial Plast Surg 28(1):8–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen SR, Berner CF, Busso M, Gleason MC, Hamilton D, Holmes RE, Romano JJ, Rullan PP, Thaler MP, Ubogy Z, Vecchione TR (2006) ArteFill: a long-lasting injectable wrinkle filler material-summary of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration trials and a progress report on 4- to 5-year outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(3 Suppl):64S–76S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alcalay J, Alkalay R, Gat A, Yorav S (2003) Late-onset granulomatous reaction to Artecoll. Dermatol Surg 29(8):859–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen SR, Berner CF, Busso M, Clopton P, Hamilton D, Romano JJ, Rullan PP, Thaler MP, Ubogy Z, Vecchione TR (2007) Five-year safety and efficacy of a novel polymethylmethacrylate aesthetic soft tissue filler for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 33(Suppl 2):S222–S230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen S, Dover J, Monheit G, Narins R, Sadick N, Werschler WP, Karnik J, Smith SR (2015) Five-year safety and satisfaction study of PMMA-collagen in the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 41(Suppl 1):S302–S313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salles AG, Lotierzo PH, Gemperli R, Besteiro JM, Ishida LC, Gimenez RP, Menezes J, Ferreira MC (2008) Complications after polymethylmethacrylate injections: report of 32 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1811–1820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park TH, Seo SW, Kim JK, Chang CH (2012) Clinical experience with polymethylmethacrylate microsphere filler complications. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(2):421–426

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conejo-Mir JS, Sanz Guirado S, Angel Muñoz M (2006) Adverse granulomatous reaction to Artecoll treated by intralesional 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone injections. Dermatol Surg 32(8):1079–1081

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Phillips B, Thornton H (2011) Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine

  10. Cohen SR, Holmes RE (2004) Artecoll: a long-lasting injectable wrinkle filler material: report of a controlled, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 251 subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(4):964–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagal A, Dahiya R, Tsai V, Adamson PA (2007) Clinical experience with polymethylmethacrylate microspheres (Artecoll) for soft-tissue augmentation: a retrospective review. Arch Fac Plast Surg 9(4):275–280

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon P, Sklar M, Zener R (2012) Facial soft tissue augmentation with Artecoll(®): a review of eight years of clinical experience in 153 patients. Can J Plast Surg 20(1):28–32

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mani N, McLeod J, Sauder MB, Sauder DN, Bothwell MR (2013) Novel use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres in the treatment of infraorbital rhytids. J Cosmet Dermatol 12(4):275–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemperle G, Gauthier-Hazan N, Lemperle M (1998) PMMA-microspheres (Artecoll) for long-lasting correction of wrinkles: refinements and statistical results. Aesthet Plast Surg 22(5):356–365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvalho Costa IM, Salaro CP, Costa MC (2009) Polymethylmethacrylate facial implant: a successful personal experience in Brazil for more than 9 years. Dermatol Surg 35(8):1221–1227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karnik J, Baumann L, Bruce S, Callender V, Cohen S, Grimes P, Joseph J, Shamban A, Spencer J, Tedaldi R, Werschler WP, Smith SR (2014) A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial of suspended polymethylmethacrylate microspheres for the correction of atrophic facial acne scars. J Am Acad Dermatol 71(1):77–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mills DC, Camp S, Mosser S, Sayeg A, Hurwitz D, Ronel D (2013) Malar augmentation with a polymethylmethacrylate-enhanced filler: assessment of a 12-month open-label pilot study. Aesthet Surg J. 33(3):421–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nácul AM (2005) Contour of the lower third of the face using an intramusculary injectable implant. Aesthet Plast Surg. 29(4):222–229

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carle MV, Roe R, Novack R, Boyer DS (2014) Cosmetic facial fillers and severe vision loss. JAMA Ophthalmol 132(5):637–639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Castro AC, Collares MV, Portinho CP, Dias PC, Pinto R (2007) Extensive facial necrosis after infiltration of polymethylmethacrylate. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 73(6):850

    Google Scholar 

  21. da Costa Miguel MC, Nonaka CF, dos Santos JN, Germano AR, de Souza LB (2009) Oral foreign body granuloma: unusual presentation of a rare adverse reaction to permanent injectable cosmetic filler. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(4):385–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faria KM, Fonseca FP, Silva WG, Silva RN, Vargas PA, de Almeida OP, Lopes MA, Santos-Silva AR (2014) Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of perioral adverse reactions to cosmetic dermal fillers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 117(5):e393–e395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedmann DP, Kurian A, Fitzpatrick RE (2016) Delayed granulomatous reactions to facial cosmetic injections of polymethylmethacrylate microspheres and liquid injectable silicone: a case series. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(3):170–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelfer A, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Jang F, Bernstein SC (2007) The natural history of polymethylmethacrylate microspheres granulomas. Dermatol Surg 33(5):614–620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoffmann C, Schuller-Petrovic S, Soyer HP, Kerl H (1999) Adverse reactions after cosmetic lip augmentation with permanent biologically inert implant materials. J Am Acad Dermatol 40(1):100–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kadouch JA, Kadouch DJ, Fortuin S, van Rozelaar L, Karim RB, Hoekzema R (2013) Delayed-onset complications of facial soft tissue augmentation with permanent fillers in 85 patients. Dermatol Surg 39(10):1474–1485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Limongi RM, Tao J, Borba A, Pereira F, Pimentel AR, Akaishi P, Velasco e Cruz AA (2016) Complications and Management of Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injections to the midface. Aesthet Surg J. 36(2):132–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lombardi T, Samson J, Plantier F, Husson C, Küffer R (2004) Orofacial granulomas after injection of cosmetic fillers. Histopathologic and clinical study of 11 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 33(2):115–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Quirino MR, Neves AC, Campos MS, Brandão AA, Anbinder AL (2012) Oral granuloma formation after injection of cosmetic filler. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(7):e194–e197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reisberger EM, Landthaler M, Wiest L, Schröder J, Stolz W (2003) Foreign body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate microspheres: successful treatment with allopurinol. Arch Dermatol 139(1):17–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudolph CM, Soyer HP, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kerl H (1999) Foreign body granulomas due to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Surg Pathol 23(1):113–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ledon JA, Savas JA, Yang S, Franca K, Camacho I, Nouri K (2013) Inflammatory nodules following soft tissue filler use: a review of causative agents, pathology and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol 14(5):401–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Silva MT, Curi AL (2004) Blindness and total ophthalmoplegia after aesthetic polymethylmethacrylate injection: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 62(3B):873–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfram D, Tzankov A, Piza-Katzer H (2006) Surgery for foreign body reactions due to injectable fillers. Dermatology 213(4):300–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu W, Chayavichitsilp P, Hata T (2012) Extremely delayed granulomatous reaction to soft-tissue injectables (polymethyl methacrylate). J Am Acad Dermatol 67(5):e206–e207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sidwell RU, McL Johnson N, Francis N, Bunker CB (2006) Cutaneous sarcoidal granulomas developing after Artecoll facial cosmetic filler in a patient with newly diagnosed systemic sarcoidosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 31(2):208–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fischer J, Metzler G, Schaller M (2007) Cosmetic permanent fillers for soft tissue augmentation: a new contraindication for interferon therapies. Arch Dermatol 143(4):507–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Qattan MM (2007) Late artecoll granulomas aggravated by pregnancy. Ann Plast Surg 58(5):592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bisschop C, Bruijn MS, Stenekes MW, Diercks GF, Hospers GA (2016) Foreign body reaction triggered by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade 25 years after dermal filler injection. Br J Dermatol 175(6):1351–1353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Heath CR, David J, Taylor SC (2012) Sarcoidosis: are there differences in your skin of color patients? J Am Acad Dermatol 66(1):121.e1–121.e14

    Google Scholar 

  41. Haneke E (2014) Adverse effects of fillers and their histopathology. Fac Plast Surg 30(6):599–614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Haneke E (2019) Adverse effects of fillers. Dermatol Ther. 32(2):e12676. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.12676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lemperle G, Morhenn V, Charrier U (2003) Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27(5):354–366

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ahn CS, Rao BK (2014) The life cycles and biological end pathways of dermal fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol 13(3):212–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fernandez-Cossio S, Castano-Oreja MT (2006) Biocompatibility of two novel dermal fillers: histological evaluation of implants of a hyaluronic acid filler and a polyacrylamide filler. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1789–1796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosa SC, de Magalhães AV, de Macedo JL (2008) An experimental study of tissue reaction to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres (Artecoll) and dimethylsiloxane (DMS) in the mouse. Am J Dermatopathol 30(3):222–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vargas KF, Borghetti RL, Moure SP, Cherubini K, de Figueiredo MA (2016) Local and systemic tissue response submitted to injection of 2 and 30% polymethylmethacrylate in rats’ tongue. Gerodontology. 33(1):36–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. de Melo Carpaneda E, Carpaneda CA (2012) Adverse results with PMMA fillers. Aesthet Plast Surg. 36(4):955–963

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saylan Z (2003) Facial fillers and their complications. Aesthet Surg J. 23(3):221–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Signorini M, Liew S, Sundaram H, De Boulle KL, Goodman GJ, Monheit G, Wu Y, Trindade de Almeida AR, Swift A, Vieira Braz A, Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers-evidence- and opinion-based review and consensus recommendations (2016) Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers-evidence- and opinion-based review and consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):961e–971e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cotofana S, Schenck TL, Trevidic P, Sykes J, Massry GG, Liew S, Graivier M, Dayan S, de Maio M, Fitzgerald R, Andrews JT, Remington BK (2015) Midface: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(5 Suppl):219S–234S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. McCracken MS, Khan JA, Wulc AE, Holds JB, Fante RG, Migliori ME, Ebroon DA, Amato MM, Silkiss RZ, Patel BC (2006) Hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane) filler for facial rhytids: lessons learned from American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery member treatment of 286 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 22(3):188–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hatcher JL, Goldman ND (2014) Recognition and treatment of non-infectious hyaluronic acid reactions. J Dermatol Treat 25(6):513–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Grunebaum LD, Bogdan Allemann I, Dayan S et al (2009) The risk of alar necrosis associated with dermal filler injection. Dermatol Surg 35:1635–1640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Adcock IM, Mumby S (2017) Glucocorticoids. Handb Exp Pharmacol 237:171–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fischer HJ, Schweingruber N, Lühder F, Reichardt HM (2013) The potential role of T cell migration and chemotaxis as targets of glucocorticoids in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 380(1–2):99–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5):330–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bijlard E, Steltenpool S, Niessen FB (2015) Intralesional 5-fluorouracil in keloid treatment: a systematic review. Acta Derm Venereol 95(7):778–782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. de Barros Silveira LK, de Oliveira FL, Alves Tde B, Rambaldi ML, de Andrade FC, Kelmer Sde C, Barbosa FC (2012) The therapeutic benefit of allopurinol in the treatment of foreign body granulomas caused by polymethylmethacrylate microspheres. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2012:945205

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tsai TF, Yeh TY (2010) Allopurinol in dermatology. Am J Clin Dermatol 11(4):225–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Badgwell C, Rosen T (2007) Cutaneous sarcoidosis therapy updated. J Am Acad Dermatol 56(1):69–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Breghoej A, Jemec GB (2005) Low-dose allopurinol in the treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis: response in four of seven patients. J Dermatol Treat 16:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  63. El-Euch D, Mokni M, Trojjet S, Khouaja A, Osman AB (1999) Sarcoidosis in a child treated successfully with allopurinol. Br J Dermatol 140:1184–1185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pfau A, Stolz W, Karrer S, Szeimies RM, Landthaler M (1998) Allopurinol in treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis. Hautarzt 49:216–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nakahara T, Morimoto H, Murakami N, Furue M (2018) Mechanistic insights into topical tacrolimus for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 29(3):233–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cury Martins J, Martins C, Aoki V, Gois AF, Ishii HA, da Silva EM (2015) Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD009864

    Google Scholar 

  67. Caproni M, Torchia D, Antiga E et al (2007) The comparative effects of tacrolimus and hydrocortisone in adult atopic dermatitis: an immunohistochemical study. Br J Dermatol 156:312–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Amin AR, Patel RN, Thakker GD, Lowenstein CJ, Attur MG, Abramson SB (1997) Post-transcriptional regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA in murine macrophages by doxycycline and chemically modified tetracyclines. FEBS Lett 410:259–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Golub LM, Ramamurthy NS, McNamara TF, Greenwald RA, Rifkin BR (1991) Tetracyclines inhibit connective tissue breakdown: new therapeutic implications for an old family of drugs. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2:297–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Garrido-Mesa N, Zarzuelo A, Gálvez J (2013) Minocycline: far beyond an antibiotic. Br J Pharmacol 169(2):337–352

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Humbert P, Treffel P, Chapuis JF, Buchet S, Derancourt C, Agache P (1991) The tetracyclines in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 25:691–697

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sapadin AN, Fleischmajer R (2006) Tetracyclines: nonantibiotic properties and their clinical implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:258–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bachelez H, Senet P, Cadranel J, Kaoukhov A, Dubertret L (2001) The use of tetracyclines for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol 137:69–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Korting HC, Schöllmann C (2009) Current topical and systemic approaches to treatment of rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:876–882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Marcoval J, Mana J, Moreno A et al (2001) Foreign bodies in granulomatous cutaneous lesions of patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol 137:427–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Hurst EA, Mauro T (2005) Sarcoidosis associated with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol 141:865–868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mayberry J, Lee WM (2019) The revolution in treatment of hepatitis C. Med Clin N Am 103(1):43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Tivol EA, Borriello F, Schweitzer AN et al (1995) Loss of CTLA-4 leads to massive lymphoproliferation and fatal multiorgan tissue destruction, revealing a critical negative regulatory role of CTLA-4. Immunity 3(5):541–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bonney EA (2016) Immune regulation in pregnancy: a matter of perspective? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 43(4):679–698

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Ning F, Liu H, Lash GE (2016) The role of decidual macrophages during normal and pathological pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 75(3):298–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Peres Paulucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paulucci, B.P. PMMA Safety for Facial Filling: Review of Rates of Granuloma Occurrence and Treatment Methods. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 148–159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01522-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01522-2

Keywords

Navigation