Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invasion of cane toads (Rhinella marina) affects the problem-solving performance of vulnerable predators (monitor lizards, Varanus varius)

  • Featured Student Research Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variation in morphological, genetic, or behavioural traits within and among native species can modify vulnerability to impacts from an invasive species. If an individual’s vulnerability depends upon its cognitive performance, we may see adaptive shifts in cognitive traits post-invasion. Commonly, animals with enhanced cognitive abilities perform better in novel tasks, often by prioritising decision accuracy over decision speed. In eastern Australia, giant monitor lizards (Varanus varius) are fatally poisoned if they ingest invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), but vulnerability is lower for individuals that carefully evaluate the novel prey type before swallowing it. To test if toad-imposed selection for neophobia and caution affected cognitive performance, we tested free-ranging monitors with a device that required lizards to manipulate the apparatus in order to obtain food. Success at accomplishing that task, and the speed of that success, was lower and slower in lizards from long-colonised sites than from uninvaded sites. Our results suggest that toad invasion has modified cognitive phenotypes within populations of this apex predator, a change that might have substantial effects on other species.

Significance statement

Many studies of the impacts of biological invasions focus on the numerical effect of an invader on the abundances of native taxa, neglecting other types of impacts. Colonising taxa can also impose selection on behavioural traits of native species, generating shifts in behaviour as native taxa adapt to intruders. Such shifts in behaviour are interesting not only in their own right but also because such shifts (especially in apex predators) may influence other taxa within food webs. Importantly, the nature and magnitude of such shifts may change over time post-invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the Figshare repository: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12863993.

References

  • Amiel JJ, Tingley R, Shine R (2011) Smart moves: effects of relative brain size on establishment success of invasive amphibians and reptiles. PLoS ONE 6:e18277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barber NA, Marquis RJ, Tori WP (2008) Invasive prey impacts the abundance and distribution of native predators. Ecology 89:2678–2683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal A, Thaker M (2019) Lizards from suburban areas learn faster to stay safe. Biol Lett 15:20190009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berthon K (2015) How do native species respond to invaders? Mechanistic and trait-based perspectives. Biol Invasions 17:2199–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau PE, Pangle KL, Reed EM, Peacor SD (2013) Finely tuned response of native prey to an invasive predator in a freshwater system. Ecology 94:1449–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caller G, Brown C (2013) Evolutionary responses to invasion: cane toad sympatric fish show enhanced avoidance learning. PLoS ONE 8:e54909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carter AJ, Goldizen AW, Tromp SA (2010) Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation. Behav Ecol 21:655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger H (2014) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. CSIRO publishing, Collingwood, Victoria

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper T, Liew A, Andrle G et al (2019) Latency in problem solving as evidence for learning in varanid and helodermatid lizards, with comments on foraging techniques. Copeia 107:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P, Thébault E, Anneville O, Duyck PF, Chapuis E, Loeuille N (2017) Impacts of invasive species on food webs. In: Bohan D, Dumbrell A, Massol F (eds) Networks of invasion: a synthesis of concepts. Academic Press, London, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lisle HF (1996) The natural history of monitor lizards. Krieger, Malabar, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Doody JS, Castellano CM, Rhind D, Green B (2012) Indirect facilitation of a native mesopredator by an invasive species: are cane toads re-shaping tropical riparian communities? Biol Invasions 15:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly CJ, Shine R, Greenlees MJ (2015) The impact of invasive cane toads on native wildlife in southern Australia. Ecol Evol 5:3879–3894

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly CJ, Shine R, Greenlees MJ (2016) The impacts of a toxic invasive prey species (the cane toad, Rhinella marina) on a vulnerable predator (the lace monitor, Varanus varius). Biol Invasions 18:1499–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kis A, Huber L, Wilkinson A (2015) Social learning by imitation in a reptile (Pogona vitticeps). Anim Cogn 18:325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Letnic M, Webb JK, Shine R (2008) Invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) cause mass mortality of freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) in tropical Australia. Biol Conserv 141:1773–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manrod JD, Hartdegen R, Burghardt GM (2008) Rapid solving of a problem apparatus by juvenile black-throated monitor lizards (Varanus albigularis albigularis). Anim Cogn 11:267–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall BM, Casewell NR, Vences M, Glaw F, Andreone F, Rakotoarison A, Zancolli G, Woog F, Wuster W (2018) Widespread vulnerability of Malagasy predators to the toxins of an introduced toad. Curr Biol 28:R654–R655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DWM, Crossland MR, Shine R (2010) Behavioural responses of native predators to an invasive toxic prey species. Austral Ecol 36:605–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersesian CL, Banks PB, McArthur C (2011) Behavioural responses to indirect and direct predator cues by a mammalian herbivore, the common brushtail possum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Webb JK, Shine R (2010) Conditioned taste aversion enhances the survival of an endangered predator imperilled by a toxic invader. J Appl Ecol 47:558–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit L, Ward-Fear G, Shine R (2020) To coexist with a toxic invader, choose your meals carefully. Sci Rep 10:21866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit L, Ward-Fear G, Shine R (in press) Anthropogenically disturbed habitats contain bigger and bolder reptilian predators. Ecol Evol

  • Phillips BL, Brown GP, Shine R (2003) Assessing the potential impact of cane toads on Australian snakes. Conserv Biol 17:1738–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BL, Shine R (2004) Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17150–17155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch K, Madsen T, Ujvari B (2017) No signs of Na+/K+-ATPase adaptations to an invasive exotic toxic prey in native squamate predators. Austral Ecol 42:929–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Réale D, Garant D, Humphries MM, Bergeron P, Careau V, Montiglio P-O (2010) Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:4051–4063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royauté R, Pruitt JN (2015) Varying predator personalities generates contrasting prey communities in an agroecosystem. Ecology 96:2902–2911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (2010) The ecological impact of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in Australia. Q Rev Biol 85:253–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5460–5465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storks L, Leal M (2020) Thinking outside the box: problem-solving in free-living lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett 9:357–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland DR, Glen AS, de Tores PJ (2011) Could controlling mammalian carnivores lead to mesopredator release of carnivorous reptiles? Phil Trans R Soc B 278:641–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo B, Damas-Moreira I, Whiting MJ (2020) Can cognitive ability give invasive species the means to succeed? A review of the evidence. Front Ecol Evol 8:187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabo B, Noble DWA, Byrne RW, Tait DS, Whiting MJ (2018) Subproblem learning and reversal of a multidimensional visual cue in a lizard: evidence for behavioural flexibility? Anim Behav 144:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley R, Ward-Fear G, Schwarzkopf L, Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Brown G, Clulow S, Webb J, Capon R, Sheppard A (2017) New weapons in the Toad Toolkit: a review of methods to control and mitigate the biodiversity impacts of invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina). Q Rev Biol 92:123–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ujvari B, Madsen T (2009) Increased mortality of naive varanid lizards after the invasion of non-native can toads (Bufo marinus). Herpetol Conserv Biol 4:248–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Phillips BL, Skelly DK, Shine R (2007) The cane toad’s (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model. Phil Trans R Soc B 274:1413–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent M, Wilson S (1999) Australian goannas. New Holland, Frenchs Forest, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Fear G, Brown GP, Pearson DJ, West A, Rollins LA, Shine R (2018) The ecological and life history correlates of boldness in free-ranging lizards. Ecosphere 9:e02125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Fear G, Brown GP, Shine R (2020) Predators learning to avoid toxic prey: a study on individual variation among free-ranging lizards. Behaviour 157:1153–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Fear G, Pearson D, Brown G, Rangers B, Shine R (2016) Ecological immunization: in situ training of free-ranging predatory lizards reduces their vulnerability to invasive toxic prey. Biol Lett 12:20150863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weavers BW (1988) Vital statistics of the lace monitor lizard (Varanus varius) in south-eastern Australia. Vic Nat 105:142–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb JK, Brown GP, Child T, Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Shine R (2008) A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Austral Ecol 33:821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zug GR, Zug PB (1979) The marine toad, Bufo marinus: a natural history resume of native populations. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by the Australian Research Council (FL120100074), and LP was supported by funding from the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, the Ethel Mary Read Research Grant and the Australian Wildlife Society University Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LP designed the study, performed all fieldwork, conducted the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. GWF designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. RS conceived and designed the study, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lachlan Pettit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures were approved by the University of Sydney ethics committee (approval 2017/1202) and were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations under licence from state and federal wildlife agencies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Joy Downes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pettit, L., Ward-Fear, G. & Shine, R. Invasion of cane toads (Rhinella marina) affects the problem-solving performance of vulnerable predators (monitor lizards, Varanus varius). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02978-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02978-6

Keywords

Navigation