Abstract
Mate choice is often affected by multiple factors, and there are often trade-offs associated with choosing a mate. Additionally, experiments that test for mate preferences usually rely on simple two-choice tests. These tests are, however, often less complex than the scenarios that individuals face in natural populations. Here, we test female choice in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi. We looked at female preference for wave rates and proximity to males in simple two-choice tests. We then mimicked a more natural choice scenario, where females faced a cluster of six courting males that differed in their distance from the female as well as in their wave rate. In addition, we tested whether female preferences under these more complex conditions were affected by the risk of predation. We found a preference for faster wave rates and closer males in two-choice tests. The preference for closer males was, however, only evident when the difference in distance was large (15 cm), not when it was small (3 cm). When females chose between six males, they preferred the males that waved faster, even if they were further away. We did not, however, find any difference in female choice when a simulated predator was present or absent. By examining a more realistic set of options that females face, we can paint a better picture of how females’ trade-off costs and benefits during mate choice.
Significance statement
Mate choice experiments often rely on two-choice tests. Mate choice, however, is often more complex under totally natural conditions. Using a two-choice experiment, we show that female fiddler crabs U. mjoebergi show a preference for faster wave rates and closer males. Under a more natural choice scenario, when choosing between six males, females preferred to travel longer to reach faster waving males. We found that female responses did not differ when a predator was present or absent. Designing choice experiments to more accurately mimic natural conditions will allow assessing trade-offs that occur in mate choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Atwell A, Wagner WE Jr (2015) Along came a spider who sat down beside her: perceived predation risk, but not female age, affects female mate choosiness. Behav Process 115:143–148
Auld HL, Godin J-GJ (2015) Sexual voyeurs and copiers: social copying and the audience effect on male mate choice in the guppy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1795–1807
Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1990) Suitable approach perches affect female phonotaxis in an arboreal frog. Herpetologica 46:11–14
Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1996) Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:407–416
Bakker TCM, Milinski M (1991) Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:205–210
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57:289–300
Berglund A (1993) Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Anim Behav 46:169–175
Bonachea LA, Ryan MJ (2011) Localization error and search costs during mate choice in tungara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ethology 117:56–62
Booksmythe I, Detto T, Backwell PRY (2008) Female fiddler crabs settle for less: the travel costs of mate choice. Anim Behav 76:1775–1781
Booksmythe I, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2011) Male fiddler crabs prefer conspecific females during simultaneous, but not sequential, mate choice. Anim Behav 81:775–778
Callander S, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2012) The effect of claw size and wave rate on female choice in a fiddler crab. J Ethol 30:151–155
Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2006) Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nat Rev Genet 7:681–692
Clark HL, Backwell PRY (2015) Temporal and spatial variation in female mating preferences in a fiddler crab. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1779–1784
Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A (2006) Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr Biol 16:R755–R765
Detto T, Backwell PRY (2009) The fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi uses ultraviolet cues in mate choice but not aggressive interactions. Anim Behav 78:407–411
Detto T, Backwell PRY, Hemmi JM, Zeil J (2006) Visually mediated species and neighbour recognition in fiddler crabs (Uca mjoebergi and Uca capricomis). P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 273:1661–1666
Development Core Team R (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Dougherty LR, Shuker DM (2015) The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 26:311–319
Dyson ML, Passmore NI (1988) Two-choice phonotaxis in Hyperolius marmoratus (Anura: Hyperoliidae): the effect of temporal variation in presented stimuli. Anim Behav 36:648–652
Evans JP, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (2004) Female mating preferences for colourful males in a population of guppies subject to high predation. J Fish Biol 65:1154–1159
Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2003) Optimal assessment of multiple cues. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 270:1637–1643
Forsgren E (1992) Predation risk affects mate choice in a Gobiid fish. Am Nat 140:1041–1049
Gong A, Gibson RM (1996) Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 52:1007–1015
Head ML, Kahn A, Keogh JS, Jennions MD (2016) Sexual selection on body size, genitals and heterozygosity: effects of demography and habitat complexity. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/045724:045724.
Hedrick AV, Dill LM (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46:193–196
Holman L, Kahn AT, Backwell PRY (2014) Fiddlers on the roof: elevation muddles mate choice in fiddler crabs. Behav Ecol 25:271–275
Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283–327
Johnson JB, Basolo AL (2003) Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav Ecol 14:619–625
Kahn AT, Dolstra T, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2013) Strategic male courtship effort varies in concert with adaptive shifts in female mating preferences. Behav Ecol 24:906–913
Kim TW, Christy JH, Dennenmoser S, Choe JC (2009) The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 276:775–780
Lea AM, Ryan MJ (2015) Irrationality in mate choice revealed by tungara frogs. Science 349:964–966
Lindström K, Lehtonen TK (2013) Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 280
Milner RNC, Detto T, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2010) Experimental evidence for a seasonal shift in the strength of a female mating preference. Behav Ecol 21:311–316
Owens IP (2006) Where is behavioural ecology going? Trends Ecol Evol 21:356–361
Peso M, Telford L, Backwell PRY (2014) Comparison shopping: detectability and mate preferences in a fiddler crab. Anim Behav 88:107–111
Pomiankowski A (1987) The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol 128:195–218
Real L (1990) Search theory and mate choice .1. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376–405
Reaney LT (2009) Female preference for male phenotypic traits in a fiddler crab: do females use absolute or comparative evaluation? Anim Behav 77:139–143
Reaney LT, Backwell PRY (2007) Temporal constraints and female preference for burrow width in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1515–1521
Reaney LT, Sims RA, Sims SWM, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2008) Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs. Curr Biol 18:R62–R63
Rowe L, Arnqvist G (2015) Two faces of environmental effects on mate choice: a comment on Dougherty & Shuker. Behav Ecol 26:324–324
Schwartz JJ, Hunce R, Lentine B, Powers K (2016) Calling site choice and its impact on call degradation and call attractiveness in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:1–19
Telford SR, Dyson ML, Passmore NI (1989) Mate choice occurs only in small choruses of painted reed frogs Hyperolius marmoratus. Bioacoustics 2:47–53
Velásquez NA, Luis Valdes J, Vásquez RA, Penna M (2015) Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution. Behav Process 118:76–84
Wacker S, Sara Ö-N, Forsgrena E, Newporta C, Amundsen T (2016) Mate choice plasticity in a coral reef fish. Behav Ecol
Wagner WE (1998) Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55:1029–1042
Yasumiba K, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L (2015) Why do male and female cane toads, Rhinella marina, respond differently to advertisement calls? Anim Behav 109:141–147
Zhu Z, Kim TW, Choe JC (2012) Is female preference for large sexual ornaments due to a bias to escape predation risk? BMC Evol Biol 12:33
Zhu B, Wang J, Zhao L, Sun Z, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J (2016) Bigger is not always better: females prefer males of mean body size in Philautus odontotarsus. PLoS One 11:e0149879
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant to P.R.Y.B. (DP120101427). R.V.-T. was supported by the fellowships from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-México and the Research School of Biology. We are grateful to the staff of the North Australia Research Unit for providing the research facilities. We thank Megan L. Head and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This work was performed under an ethics approval permit (A2015/54) from the Australian National University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (ANUAEEC).
Additional information
Communicated by T. Breithaupt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vega-Trejo, R., Backwell, P.R.Y. Testing female preferences under more natural conditions: a case study on a fiddler crab. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2314-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2314-4