Skip to main content
Log in

Bonobos use call combinations to facilitate inter-party travel recruitment

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many primates produce vocalizations when initiating travel. These “travel calls” are often acoustically similar to vocalizations unrelated to travel, and listeners appear to rely on a shared context with callers to correctly interpret the calls. When individuals use vocalizations to coordinate movement with out-of-sight group mates, however, such pragmatic cues are unavailable. Under these circumstances, effective communication may depend on more informative acoustic signals. Here, we investigate travel-related vocalizations that occur when callers and listeners cannot see one another: long-distance calls given by wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). We find that production of a specific call combination, the “low hoot-high hoot,” is more likely than a high hoot alone to be produced prior to travel. Furthermore, the low hoot-high hoot combination is more likely to result in inter-party recruitment—that is, individuals from other parties are more likely to approach the caller. We also compare these observations with previous research and find that bonobos appear to use distinct call combinations to facilitate specific movement patterns common in fission-fusion social structures. These results suggest that use of call combinations allow bonobos to convey more specific information than do single call types alone and that this additional information allows for effective communication between out-of-sight parties.

Significance statement

When an animal hears a conspecific vocalization, it is able to respond appropriately by integrating information about the call type itself and the context in which it was given. Vocalizations produced by out-of-sight individuals, therefore, present a challenge: how can a listener respond appropriately with only partial information about the context of the call? In situations where distant bonobos are communicating with one another, we find that call combinations are potentially more informative to listeners than single call types alone. The use of call combinations in such situations may allow listeners to respond appropriately to conspecific vocalizations even with ambiguous information about the context in which the call was produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C et al (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr Anthropol 49:627–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo M, Omedes A (1999) Preliminary vocal repertoire and vocal communication of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Lilungu (Democratic Republic of Congo). Folia Primatol 70:328–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S (1993) Vocal coordination of troop movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Am J Primatol 30:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S, Garber PA (2000) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Bousquet CAH, Sumpter DJT, Manser MB (2011) Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:1482–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay Z, Archbold J, Zuberbühler (2015) Functional flexibility in wild bonobo vocal behaviour. Peer J 3:e1124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • da Cunha RGT, Byrne RW (2009) The use of vocal communication in keeping the spatial cohesion of groups: intentionality and specific functions. In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann EW, Strier KB (eds) South American Primates. Springer, New York, pp 341–363

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (1988) The communicative repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus), compared to that of chimpanzees. Behaviour 106:183–251

  • Fedurek P, Donnellan E, Slocombe KE (2014) Social and ecological correlates of long-distance pant hoot calls in male chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1345–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Zinner D (2011) Communication and cognition in primate group movement. Int J Primatol 32:1279–1295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick AS, Cheney DL, Schneider JM, Seyfarth RM, Holekamp KE (2015) Long-distance communication facilitates cooperation among wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav 103:107–116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber T, Zuberbühler K (2013) Vocal recruitment for joint travel in wild chimpanzees. PLoS One 8:e76073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann G, Fruth B (1994) Structure and use of distance calls in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Int J Primatol 15:767–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann G, Fruth B (2003) Lui Kotal—a new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. Pan Africa News 10:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalan AK, Mundry R, Boesch C (2015) Wild chimpanzees modify food call structure with respect to tree size for a particular fruit species. Anim Behav 101:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanō T (1992) The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo N, Watanabe S (2009) Contact calls: information and social function. Jpn Psychol Res 51:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammers MO, Schotten M, Au WW (2006) The spatial context of free-ranging Hawaiian spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris) producing acoustic signals. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1244–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Boesch C (2004) To fission or to fusion: effects of community size on wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) social organisation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighty KA, Soltis J, Wesolek CM, Savage A (2008) Rumble vocalizations mediate interpartner distance in African elephants, Loxodonta africana. Anim Behav 76:1601–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Nishida T (1993) Contexts and social correlates of long-distance calling by male chimpanzees. Anim Behav 45:735–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, van Schaik CP (2007) The response of adult orangutans to flanged male long calls: inferences about their function. Folia Primatol 78:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole JH (2011) Behavioral contexts of elephant acoustic communication. In: Moss CJ, Croze HJ, Less PC (eds) The Amboseli elephants: a long-term perspective on a long-lived mammal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 125–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Price T, Wadewitz P, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Hammerschmidt K, Fischer J (2015) Vervets revisited: a quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity. Sci Rep 5:13220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Fernández G (2005) Vocal communication in a fission–fusion society: do spider monkeys stay in touch with close associates? Int J Primatol 26:1077–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendall D, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Owren MJ (1999) The meaning and function of grunt variants in baboons. Anim Behav 57:583–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schamberg I, Cheney DL, Clay Z, Hohmann G, Seyfarth RM (2016) Call combinations, vocal exchanges and interparty movement in wild bonobos. Anim Behav 122:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker P, Chemla E, Schel AM, Fuller J, Gautier JP, Kuhn J, Veselinović D, Arnold K, Cäsar C, Keenan S, Lemasson A, Ouattara K, Ryder R, Zuberbühler K (2016) Formal monkey linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 42:1–90

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2016a) The origin of meaning in animal signals. Anim Behav 124:339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2016b) Schlenker et al.’s informativity principle. Theor Linguist 42:155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spehar SN, Di Fiore A (2013) Loud calls as a mechanism of social coordination in a fission–fusion taxon, the white-bellied spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KJ, Harcourt AH (1994) Gorillas’ vocalizations during rest periods: signals of impending departure? Behaviour 130:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur C, King AJ, Conradt L, Kerth G, Lusseau D, Mettke-Hofmann C, Schaffner CM, Williams L, Zinner D, Aureli F (2011) Collective decision-making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework. Oikos 120:1608–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BC, Fischer J (2012) Functionally referential signals: a promising paradigm whose time has passed. Evol Anthropol 21:195–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White FJ, Waller M, Boose K, Merrill MY, Wood KD (2015) Function of loud calls in wild bonobos. J Anthropol Sci 93:1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) for permission to conduct research in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We are grateful to Lys Alcayna for data collection in the field and three anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Schamberg.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the current laws in the USA, Germany, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Research was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania (Protocol no. 804117).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (IS) and grants from the Leaky Foundation (IS and ZC), the Department of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania (IS), National Geographic Society (RMS and ZC) (Grant #9115-12).

Additional information

Communicated by R. I. M. Dunbar

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schamberg, I., Cheney, D.L., Clay, Z. et al. Bonobos use call combinations to facilitate inter-party travel recruitment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2301-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2301-9

Keywords

Navigation