Skip to main content
Log in

Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mate choice copying was mostly described as a strategy employed by females to assess the quality of potential mates, but also males can copy other males’ mate choice. An open question in this context is whether and how copying males evaluate sperm competition risk, as mating with a female that has already copulated with another male obviously sets the stage for intense sperm competition (i.e., in species with internal fertilization). Using the livebearing Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana) as a model, we asked (a) whether males of that species indeed copy other males’ choices, and if they do so, (b) whether copying males strategically adjust their behavior to sperm competition risk. We used an approach where focal males could first choose to associate with a large or a small stimulus female. Mate choice tests were then repeated after an “observation phase” during which either no model male was present (treatment 1, control) or the previously non-preferred female could be seen associating (treatment 2) or physically interacting (treatment 3) with a model male. We found that, after the observation phase, males spent considerably more time with the previously non-preferred female in treatment (2), i.e., they copied the model male’s choice. This effect was much weaker during treatment (3) where sexual interactions between the model male and the formerly non-preferred female were allowed. Males, therefore, seem to adjust their copying behavior strategically to the perceived risk of sperm competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum SL, Cruz A (2000) The role of mate-choice copying and disruption effects in mate preference determination of Limia perugiae (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae). Ethology 106:933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquiloni L, Buřič M, Gherardi F (2008) Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males before choosing the dominant mate. Curr Biol 18:462–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auld HL, Punzalan D, Godin J-GJ, Rundle HD (2009) Do female fruit flies (Drosophila serrata) copy the mate choice of others? Behav Processes 82:78–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basolo AL (1990) Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250:808–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becher SA, Magurran AE (2004) Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1009–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev 76:305–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie KE, Earley RL (2007) Expanding the scope for social information use. Anim Behav 74:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bro-Jørgensen J (2007) Reversed sexual conflict in a promiscuous antelope. Curr Biol 17:2157–2161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R (1998) The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 13:45–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R (1999) Mate choice copying in guppies: females avoid the place where they saw courtship. Behaviour 136:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318:1882–1885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T, McComb K (1993) Experimental tests of copying and mate choice in fallow deer (Dama dama). Behav Ecol 4:191–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constanz GD (1984) Sperm competition in poeciliid fishes. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, Orlando, pp 465–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabelsteen T (2005) Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 38–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Modern Library, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dosen LD, Montgomerie R (2004) Mate preferences by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in relation to the risk of sperm competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druen M, Dugatkin AL (2011) Communication networks. In: Evans J, Pilastro A, Schlupp I (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes(Poeciliidae). Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1996) Copying and mate choice. In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic, New York, pp 85–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1998) Genes, copying, and female mate choice; shifting thresholds. Behav Ecol 9:323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1992) Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 249:179–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA, Godin J-GJ (1993) Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)—age dependent effects. Behav Ecol 4:289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley RL, Dugatkin LA (2005) Fighting, mating and networking: pillars of poeciliid sociality. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 84–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Houde AE (1995) Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Magurran AE (2001) Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 268:719–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farr JA, Travis JT (1986) Fertility advertisement by female sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Copeia 1986:467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freed-Brown G, White DJ (2009) Acoustic mate copying: female cowbirds attend to other females’ vocalizations to modify their song preferences. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 276:3319–3325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frommen JG, Rahn AK, Schroth SH, Waltschyk N, Bakker TCM (2008) Mate-choice copying when both sexes face high costs of reproduction. Evol Ecol 23(3):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG, White DJ (1998) Mate-choice copying in the Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 55:545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG, Lim TCW, Gilbert GS (2008) Evidence of mate choice copying in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim Behav 75:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Höglund J (1992) Copying and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 7:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godin JGJ, Hair KPE (2009) Mate-choice copying in free-ranging Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behaviour 146:1443–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA, Green LD (1996) Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzia latipes). Behav Ecol 7:165–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds. A role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heubel KU, Plath M (2008) Influence of male harassment and female competition on female feeding behaviour in a sexual/asexual mating complex of mollies (Poecilia mexicana, P. formosa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1689–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heubel KU, Hornhardt K, Ollmann T, Parzefall J, Ryan MJ, Schlupp I (2008) Geographic variation in female mate-copying in the species complex of a unisexual fish, Poecilia formosa. Behaviour 145:1041–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (1990) Copying the mate choice of others—observations on female black grouse. Behaviour 114:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:283–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE (2005) Eavesdropping and scent over-marking. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 344–371

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Sexual conflict: the battle of the sexes reversed. Curr Biol 18:121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA (2002) Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:319–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur DL, Lozano GA, Sclafini M (1997) Female mate choice copying in guppies, Poecilia reticulata: a re-evaluation. Anim Behav 54:579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liley NR (1966) Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of Poeciliid fishes. Behav Supp 13:1–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matos R, Schlupp I (2005) Performing in front of an audience: signallers and the social environment. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 63–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Peake T (2000) Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signaling behaviour. Acta Ethol 2:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mery F, Varela SAM, Danchin E, Blanchet S, Parejo D, Coolen I, Wagner RH (2009) Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate. Curr Biol 19:730–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1992) Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 250:229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parzefall J (1969) Zur vergleichenden Ethologie verschiedener Mollienesia-Arten einschließlich einer Höhlenform von Mollienesia sphenops. Behaviour 33:1–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peake TM (2005) Eavesdropping in communication networks. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M (1994) Improved groth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371:598–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilastro A, Simonato M, Bisazza A, Evans JP (2004) Cryptic female preferences for colorful males in guppies. Evolution 58:665–669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Schlupp I (2008) Misleading mollies—the effect of an audience on the expression of mating preferences. Comm Integr Biol 1:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Tobler M (2010) Subterranean fishes of Mexico (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae). In: Trajano E, Bichuette ME, Kapoor BG (eds) Biology of subterranean fishes. Science, Enfield, pp 281–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Parzefall J, Schlupp I (2003) The role of sexual harassment in cave—and surface—dwelling populations of the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Parzefall J, Körner KE, Schlupp I (2004) Sexual selection in darkness? Female mating preferences in surface- and cave dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:596–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Seggel U, Burmeister H, Heubel KU, Schlupp I (2006) Choosy males from the underground: male mate choice in surface- and cave dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Naturwissenschaften 93:103–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Makowicz AM, Schlupp I, Tobler M (2007) Sexual harassment in live-bearing fishes: comparing courting and non-courting species. Behav Ecol 18:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Blum D, Schlupp I, Tiedemann R (2008a) Audience effect alters mating preferences in Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana) males. Anim Behav 75:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Richter S, Tiedemann R, Schlupp I (2008b) Male fish deceive competitors about mating preferences. Curr Biol 18:1138–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Kromuszczynski K, Tiedemann R (2009) Audience effect alters male but not female mating preferences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Richter S, Tiedemann R, Schlupp I (2010) Misleading mollies: surface- butt not cave dwelling Poecilia mexicana males deceive competitors about mating preferences. Acta Ethol 13:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones S (1992) Independent versus non-independent mate choice: do females copy each other? Am Nat 140:1000–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L, Boyd R, Cownden D, Enquist M, Eriksson K, Feldman MW, Fogarty L, Ghirlanda S, Lillicrap T, Laland KN (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328:208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal HL (1952) Observations of reproduction of the poeciliid Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). Biol Bull 102:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæthers SA, Fiske P, Kalas JA (2001) Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 268:2097–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlupp I, Plath M (2005) Male mate choice and sperm allocation in a sexual/asexual mating complex (Poecilia mexicana, P. formosa, Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Biol Lett 1:169–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlupp I, Ryan MJ (1997) Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. Behav Ecol 8:104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlupp I, Marler C, Ryan MJ (1994) Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science 263:373–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlupp I, Riesch R, Tobler M, Plath M, Parzefall J, Schartl M (2010) A novel sexually selected trait in poeciliid fishes: female preference for mustache-like, rostral filaments in male Poecilia sphenops. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1849–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J (1920) Racial investigations IV. The genetic behavior of a secondary sexual character. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg Ser Physiol 14:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Meril ÄJ, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L, Ellegren H (1997) Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2005) Blue structural coloration predicts incubation provisioning in eastern bluebirds. J Avian Biol 36:488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaddle JP, Cathey MG, Correll M, Hodkinson BP (2005) Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 272:1053–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller T, Johansson L (2003) Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: are married men more attractive? Hum Nat 14:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (2007) From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 357:1549–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth D (2007) Mate choice copying in humans. Hum Nat 18:264–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Walters A, McCarthy TM, Hatch MI, Hein W (2000) Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. Anim Behav 59:467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White DJ, Galef BG (1999) Mate-choice copying and conspecific cueing in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 57:465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White DJ, Galef BG (2000) Culture in quail: social influences on mate choice of female Coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 59:975–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widemo MS (2006) Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice. Behav Ecol 17:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte K (2006) Learning and mate choice. In: Brown C, Laland KN, Krause J (eds) Fish cognition and behavior. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 70–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte K, Noltemeier B (2002) The role of information in mate-choice copying in female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte K, Ryan MJ (1998) Male body length influences mate choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna. Behav Ecol 9:534–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte K, Ryan MJ (2002) Mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna) in the wild. Anim Behav 63:943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte K, Ueding K (2003) Sailfin molly females copy the rejection of a male. Behav Ecol 14:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Jennions MD (2003) Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 270:36–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, McCarthy M (2009) Prudent male mate choice under perceived sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquito fish. Behav Ecol 20:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Jennions MD, Keogh JS (2004) Sequential male mate choice in a fish, the Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil signifer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorzinski JL, Platt ML (2010) Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans. PLoS ONE 5(2):e9115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziege M, Mahlow K, Hennige-Schulze C, Kronmarck C, Tiedemann R, Streit B, Plath M (2009) Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)—prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk? Front Zool 6:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank C. Manteuffel and H. Geupel for help with animal care and C. Bleidorn for valuable discussion. M. Ziege kindly provided the drawing of a male and a female P. mexicana for Fig. 1. Financial support came from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PL 470/3-1). The experiments reported here comply with the current laws of Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bierbach.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Czeschlik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bierbach, D., Kronmarck, C., Hennige-Schulz, C. et al. Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 1699–1707 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1177-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1177-3

Keywords

Navigation