Abstract
Sperm competition has been shown to be an important evolutionary agent affecting the behaviour, physiology, and morphology of both males and females. One morphological trait that is particularly likely to be affected by sperm competition is sperm size because it is thought to influence the competitiveness of sperm by determining sperm longevity, motility, and/or their ability to displace competing sperm. Most comparative studies across taxa have found a positive relationship between the level of sperm competition and sperm length, but very few studies have tested for a phenotypically plastic adjustment of sperm morphology in response to sperm competition. In this study, we experimentally tested for an effect of sperm competition on phenotypic plasticity in sperm morphology in an obligately outcrossing simultaneous hermaphrodite, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano, by either raising worms in monogamous pairs (no sperm competition) or in promiscuous groups (intense sperm competition). Worms in groups produced larger testes and smaller ovaries as predicted by sex allocation theory and as previously documented in this species. However, we found no evidence for an effect of group size on sperm morphology, measured as total sperm length, sperm body length, and the length of two different sperm appendages. We conclude that M. lignano may either be incapable of adjusting the sperm morphology in a phenotypically plastic way and/or that there might be no benefit of phenotypic plasticity in sperm traits in this species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amitin EG, Pitnick S (2007) Influence of developmental environment on male- and female-mediated sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 20:381–391
Andersen RA, Berges JA, Harrison PJ, Watanabe MM (2005) Recipes for freshwater and seawater media. In: Andersen RA (ed) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 429–538
Awata S, Takeyama T, Makino Y, Kitamura Y, Kohda M (2008) Cooperatively breeding cichlid fish adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in relation to sperm competition risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1701–1710
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B-Stat Methodol 57:289–300
Briskie JV, Montgomerie R (1992) Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 247:89–95
Briskie JV, Montgomerie R, Birkhead TR (1997) The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51:937–945
Byrne PG, Roberts JD, Simmons LW (2002) Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. J Evol Biol 15:347–355
Crean AJ, Marshall DJ (2008) Gamete plasticity in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13508–13513
Crudgington HS, Fellows S, Badcock NS, Snook RR (2009) Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution 63:926–938
Gage MJG (1994) Associations between body-size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 258:247–254
Gage MJG, Freckleton RP (2003) Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 270:625–632
Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA (2004) Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol 14:44–47
Gay L, Hosken DJ, Vasudev R, Tregenza T, Eady PE (2009) Sperm competition and maternal effects differentially influence testis and sperm size in Callosobruchus maculatus. J Evol Biol 22:1143–1150
Gomendio M, Roldan ERS (1991) Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 243:181–185
Hosken DJ (1997) Sperm competition in bats. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 264:385–392
Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2001) Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol Lett 4:10–13
Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI (2001) Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 11:489–493
Immler S, Pryke SR, Birkhead TR, Griffith SC (in press) Pronounced within-individual plasticity in sperm morphometry across social environments. Evolution
Janicke T, Schärer L (2009a) Determinants of mating and sperm-transfer success in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. J Evol Biol 22:405–415
Janicke T, Schärer L (2009b) Sex allocation predicts mating rate in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:4247–4253
Ladurner P, Schärer L, Salvenmoser W, Rieger RM (2005) A new model organism among the lower bilateria and the use of digital microscopy in taxonomy of meiobenthic Platyhelminthes: Macrostomum lignano, n. sp. (Rhabditophora, Macrostomorpha). J Zool Syst Evol Res 43:114–126
LaMunyon CW, Ward S (2002) Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 269:1125–1128
Lüpold S, Linz GM, Birkhead TR (2009) Sperm design and variation in the New World blackbirds (Icteridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:899–909
Miller GT, Pitnick S (2002) Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298:1230–1233
Minder AM, Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2005) Co-evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scathophagidae (Diptera). J Evol Biol 18:60–69
Minoretti N, Baur B (2006) Among- and within-population variation in sperm quality in the simultaneously hermaphroditic land snail Arianta arbustorum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:270–280
Montgomerie R, Fitzpatrick JL (2009) Testes, sperm, and sperm competition. In: Jamieson BGM (ed) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, pp 1–53
Morrow EH, Gage MJG (2001) Consistent significant variation between individual males in spermatozoal morphometry. J Zool 254:147–153
Morrow EH, Leijon A, Meerupati A (2008) Hemiclonal analysis reveals significant genetic, environmental and genotype x environment effects on sperm size in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 21:1692–1702
Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567
Parker GA (1982) Why are there so many tiny sperm—sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol 96:281–294
Parker GA (1993) Sperm competition games—sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 253:245–254
Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead T, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 3–54
Pattarini JA, Starmer WT, Bjork A, Pitnick S (2006) Mechanisms underlying the sperm quality advantage in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60:2064–2080
Pitcher TE, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA (2005) Sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds. J Evol Biol 18:557–567
Pitnick S, Miller GT, Reagan J, Holland B (2001) Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 268:1071–1080
Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR (2009a) Sperm morphological diversity. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 69–149
Pitnick S, Wolfner MF, Suarez SS (2009b) Ejaculate–Female and sperm–female interactions. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 247–304
Pizzari T, Parker GA (2009) Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 207–245
Poiani A (2006) Complexity of seminal fluid: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:289–310
R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2.10.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Ramm SA, Stockley P (2009) Adaptive plasticity of mammalian sperm production in response to social experience. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:745–751
Schärer L (2009) Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 63:1377–1405
Schärer L, Janicke T (2009) Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Biol Lett 5:705–708
Schärer L, Ladurner P (2003) Phenotypically plastic adjustment of sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 270:935–941
Schärer L, Vizoso DB (2007) Phenotypic plasticity in sperm production rate: there's more to it than testis size. Evol Ecol 21:295–306
Schärer L, Joss G, Sandner P (2004) Mating behaviour of the marine turbellarian Macrostomum sp.: these worms suck. Mar Biol 145:373–380
Schärer L, Sandner P, Michiels NK (2005) Trade-off between male and female allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm Macrostomum sp. J Evol Biol 18:396–404
Schärer L, Zaubzer J, Salvenmoser W, Seifarth C, Ladurner P (2007) Tracking sperm of a donor in a recipient: an immunocytochemical approach. Anim Biol 57:121–136
Simmons LW, Moore AJ (2009) Evolutionary quantitative genetics of sperm. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 405–434
Snook RR (2005) Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 20:46–53
Stockley P, Gage MJG, Parker GA, Møller AP (1997) Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am Nat 149:933–954
Vizoso DB, Rieger G, Schärer L (2010) Goings-on inside a worm: functional hypotheses derived from sexual conflict thinking. Biol J Linn Soc 99:370–383
Ward PI, Hauschteck-Jungen E (1993) Variation in sperm length in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L). J Insect Physiol 39:545–547
Wigby S, Chapman T (2004) Sperm competition. Curr Biol 14:R100–R103
Willems M, Leroux F, Claeys M, Boone M, Mouton S, Artois T, Borgonie G (2009) Ontogeny of the complex sperm in the macrostomid flatworm Macrostomum lignano (Macrostomorpha, Rhabditophora). J Morphol 270:162–174
Acknowledgements
We thank Peter Sandner and two anonymous referees for thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We are also grateful to Ralph Dobler for fruitful discussions and Jürgen Hottinger, Viktor Mislin, and Urs Stiefel for technical support. This study was funded by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation to L.S. (3100A0-113708 and 3100A0-127503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Moore
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Table S1
Morphological comparison between worms that were raised in different social group sizes, that is, in pairs and in octets (DOC 35 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janicke, T., Schärer, L. Sperm competition affects sex allocation but not sperm morphology in a flatworm. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 1367–1375 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0951-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0951-y