Skip to main content
Log in

Sperm competition affects sex allocation but not sperm morphology in a flatworm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sperm competition has been shown to be an important evolutionary agent affecting the behaviour, physiology, and morphology of both males and females. One morphological trait that is particularly likely to be affected by sperm competition is sperm size because it is thought to influence the competitiveness of sperm by determining sperm longevity, motility, and/or their ability to displace competing sperm. Most comparative studies across taxa have found a positive relationship between the level of sperm competition and sperm length, but very few studies have tested for a phenotypically plastic adjustment of sperm morphology in response to sperm competition. In this study, we experimentally tested for an effect of sperm competition on phenotypic plasticity in sperm morphology in an obligately outcrossing simultaneous hermaphrodite, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano, by either raising worms in monogamous pairs (no sperm competition) or in promiscuous groups (intense sperm competition). Worms in groups produced larger testes and smaller ovaries as predicted by sex allocation theory and as previously documented in this species. However, we found no evidence for an effect of group size on sperm morphology, measured as total sperm length, sperm body length, and the length of two different sperm appendages. We conclude that M. lignano may either be incapable of adjusting the sperm morphology in a phenotypically plastic way and/or that there might be no benefit of phenotypic plasticity in sperm traits in this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amitin EG, Pitnick S (2007) Influence of developmental environment on male- and female-mediated sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 20:381–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen RA, Berges JA, Harrison PJ, Watanabe MM (2005) Recipes for freshwater and seawater media. In: Andersen RA (ed) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 429–538

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Awata S, Takeyama T, Makino Y, Kitamura Y, Kohda M (2008) Cooperatively breeding cichlid fish adjust their testis size but not sperm traits in relation to sperm competition risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1701–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B-Stat Methodol 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV, Montgomerie R (1992) Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 247:89–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV, Montgomerie R, Birkhead TR (1997) The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51:937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG, Roberts JD, Simmons LW (2002) Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. J Evol Biol 15:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crean AJ, Marshall DJ (2008) Gamete plasticity in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13508–13513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crudgington HS, Fellows S, Badcock NS, Snook RR (2009) Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution 63:926–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG (1994) Associations between body-size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 258:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Freckleton RP (2003) Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 270:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA (2004) Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol 14:44–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gay L, Hosken DJ, Vasudev R, Tregenza T, Eady PE (2009) Sperm competition and maternal effects differentially influence testis and sperm size in Callosobruchus maculatus. J Evol Biol 22:1143–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio M, Roldan ERS (1991) Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 243:181–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ (1997) Sperm competition in bats. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 264:385–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2001) Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol Lett 4:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI (2001) Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 11:489–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Immler S, Pryke SR, Birkhead TR, Griffith SC (in press) Pronounced within-individual plasticity in sperm morphometry across social environments. Evolution

  • Janicke T, Schärer L (2009a) Determinants of mating and sperm-transfer success in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. J Evol Biol 22:405–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janicke T, Schärer L (2009b) Sex allocation predicts mating rate in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:4247–4253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladurner P, Schärer L, Salvenmoser W, Rieger RM (2005) A new model organism among the lower bilateria and the use of digital microscopy in taxonomy of meiobenthic Platyhelminthes: Macrostomum lignano, n. sp. (Rhabditophora, Macrostomorpha). J Zool Syst Evol Res 43:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW, Ward S (2002) Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 269:1125–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüpold S, Linz GM, Birkhead TR (2009) Sperm design and variation in the New World blackbirds (Icteridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GT, Pitnick S (2002) Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298:1230–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minder AM, Hosken DJ, Ward PI (2005) Co-evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scathophagidae (Diptera). J Evol Biol 18:60–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minoretti N, Baur B (2006) Among- and within-population variation in sperm quality in the simultaneously hermaphroditic land snail Arianta arbustorum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie R, Fitzpatrick JL (2009) Testes, sperm, and sperm competition. In: Jamieson BGM (ed) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, pp 1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow EH, Gage MJG (2001) Consistent significant variation between individual males in spermatozoal morphometry. J Zool 254:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow EH, Leijon A, Meerupati A (2008) Hemiclonal analysis reveals significant genetic, environmental and genotype x environment effects on sperm size in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 21:1692–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1982) Why are there so many tiny sperm—sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol 96:281–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1993) Sperm competition games—sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 253:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead T, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 3–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pattarini JA, Starmer WT, Bjork A, Pitnick S (2006) Mechanisms underlying the sperm quality advantage in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60:2064–2080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TE, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA (2005) Sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds. J Evol Biol 18:557–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Miller GT, Reagan J, Holland B (2001) Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 268:1071–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR (2009a) Sperm morphological diversity. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 69–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Wolfner MF, Suarez SS (2009b) Ejaculate–Female and sperm–female interactions. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 247–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Parker GA (2009) Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 207–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Poiani A (2006) Complexity of seminal fluid: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2.10.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Ramm SA, Stockley P (2009) Adaptive plasticity of mammalian sperm production in response to social experience. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:745–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L (2009) Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 63:1377–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Janicke T (2009) Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Biol Lett 5:705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Ladurner P (2003) Phenotypically plastic adjustment of sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 270:935–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Vizoso DB (2007) Phenotypic plasticity in sperm production rate: there's more to it than testis size. Evol Ecol 21:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Joss G, Sandner P (2004) Mating behaviour of the marine turbellarian Macrostomum sp.: these worms suck. Mar Biol 145:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Sandner P, Michiels NK (2005) Trade-off between male and female allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm Macrostomum sp. J Evol Biol 18:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Zaubzer J, Salvenmoser W, Seifarth C, Ladurner P (2007) Tracking sperm of a donor in a recipient: an immunocytochemical approach. Anim Biol 57:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Moore AJ (2009) Evolutionary quantitative genetics of sperm. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 405–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR (2005) Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 20:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P, Gage MJG, Parker GA, Møller AP (1997) Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am Nat 149:933–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vizoso DB, Rieger G, Schärer L (2010) Goings-on inside a worm: functional hypotheses derived from sexual conflict thinking. Biol J Linn Soc 99:370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PI, Hauschteck-Jungen E (1993) Variation in sperm length in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L). J Insect Physiol 39:545–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigby S, Chapman T (2004) Sperm competition. Curr Biol 14:R100–R103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willems M, Leroux F, Claeys M, Boone M, Mouton S, Artois T, Borgonie G (2009) Ontogeny of the complex sperm in the macrostomid flatworm Macrostomum lignano (Macrostomorpha, Rhabditophora). J Morphol 270:162–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter Sandner and two anonymous referees for thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We are also grateful to Ralph Dobler for fruitful discussions and Jürgen Hottinger, Viktor Mislin, and Urs Stiefel for technical support. This study was funded by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation to L.S. (3100A0-113708 and 3100A0-127503).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Janicke.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Moore

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Morphological comparison between worms that were raised in different social group sizes, that is, in pairs and in octets (DOC 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janicke, T., Schärer, L. Sperm competition affects sex allocation but not sperm morphology in a flatworm. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 1367–1375 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0951-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0951-y

Keywords

Navigation