Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between posterior sacral plate stabilization versus minimally invasive transiliac-transsacral lag-screw fixation in fractures of sacrum: a single-centre experience

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The sacrum is a mechanical nucleus working as the base for the spinal column, as well as the keystone of the pelvic ring. Thus, injuries of the sacrum can lead to biomechanical instability and nerve conduction abnormality.

Methods

The common classification is the Denis classification, but these fractures are often part of a lesion of the posterior pelvic ring and therefore the Tile classification is very useful. The goals of operative intervention are to reduce fracture fragments, protect neurological structures, and provide adequate stability for early mobilization.

Results

The stabilization of these injuries can be difficult even in a patient with adequate bone stock and concomitant medical comorbidities. The posterior-ring tension-band metallic plate and sacroiliac joint screw are two commonly used methods for posterior internal fixation of the pelvis.

Conclusions

In this study, we evaluate the differences, in the treatment of sacral fractures, between the two techniques, revising the literature and our experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, O’Keefe GE, Scalea TM (2002) The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma 53(3):446–50-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Poole GV, Ward EF (1994) Causes of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures. Orthopedics 17(8):691–696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gänsslen A, Tscherne H (1994) The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. ClinOrthopRelat Res 305:69–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schütz M, Stöckle U, Hoffmann R, Südkamp N, Haas N (1996) Clinical experience with two types of pelvic C-clamps for unstable pelvic ring injuries. Injury 27:p:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohamad Bydon, Vance Fredrickson, R de la Garza-Ramos, Yiping L, RA Lehman Jr, GR Trost, ZL Gokaslan, (2014) Sacral fractures. AANS;37 (1)

  6. Miller AN, Chip Routt ML Jr (2012) Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(1):8–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Conflitti JM, Graves ML, Chip Routt ML Jr (2010) Radiographic quantification and analysis of dysmorphic upper sacral osseous anatomy and associated iliosacral screw insertions. J Orthop Trauma 24:630–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Futamura K, Baba T, Mogami A, Morohashi I, Obayashi O, Iwase H, Kaneko K (2018) A biomechanical study of sacroiliac rod fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: verification of the “within ring” concept. Int Orthop 42(4):909–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3713-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubory A, Bouloussa H, Riouallon G, Wolff S (2017) A computed tomographic anatomical study of the upper sacrum. Application for a user guide of pelvic fixation with ilioscral screws in adult spinal deformity. Int Orthop 41(12):2543–2553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3580-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pishnamaz M, Dienstknecht T, Hoppe B, Garving C, Lange H, Hildebrand F, Kobbe P, Pape HC (2016) Assessment of pelvic injuries treated with ilio-sacral screws: injury severity and accuracy of screw positioning. Int Orthop 40(7):1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2933-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Routt MLC, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11(8):584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tile M (1996) Acute pelvic fractures: I. Causation and classification. J AmAcadOrthopSurg 4(3):143–151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Altman DT, Jones CB, Routt MLC (1999) Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement. J Orthop Trauma 13(3):220–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nork SE, Jones CB, Harding SP, Mirza SK, Routt MLC (2001) Percutaneous stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures using iliosacral screws: technique and early results. J Orthop Trauma 15(4):238–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bi C, Wang Q, Nagelli C, Wu J, Wang Q, Wang J (2016) Treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture with pedicle screw-rod fixator versus locking compression plate: a comparative study. Med SciMonit 22:3764–3770

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elzohairy MM, Salama AM (2017) Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. OrthopTraumatolSurg Res 103(2):223–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen HW, Liu GD, Fei J et al (2012) Treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture with percutaneous reconstruction plate and percutaneous sacroiliac screws: a comparative study. J Orthop Sci 17(5):580–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Acklin Y, Marco G, Sommer G(2014) Double locking plate fixation of sacral fractures in unstable pelvic ring C-type injuries.;(11):p: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-014-0307-2

  19. Futamura K, Baba T, Mogami A, Kanda A, Obayashi O, Iwase H, Kaneko K (2018) “Within ring”-based sacroiliac rod fixation may overcome the weakness of spinopelvic fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: technical notes and clinical outcomes. Int Orthop 42(6):1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3712-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang H, Fu YH, Ke C, Zhuang Y, Zhang K, Wei X, Li Z, Lei JL, Zhang BF, Liu P (2018) Minimally invasive stabilisation of posterior pelvic ring instabilities with pedicle screws connected to a transverse rod. Int Orthop 42(3):681–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3714-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noemi Silluzio.

Ethics declarations

Institutional review board statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the internal ethics committee of orthopedics and traumatology department of Policlinico Gemelli Hospital.

Informed consent statement

All involved persons gave their verbal informed consent prior to being included in the analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liuzza, F., Silluzio, N., Florio, M. et al. Comparison between posterior sacral plate stabilization versus minimally invasive transiliac-transsacral lag-screw fixation in fractures of sacrum: a single-centre experience. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 177–185 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4144-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4144-z

Keywords

Navigation