Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of open massive rotator cuff repairs with double-row suture knotless anchors: case series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate functional and quality of life outcomes after transosseous equivalent (TOE) double row suture technique for massive rotator cuff (RTC) tear repair using validated subjective and objective measures. This technique has shown promising preliminary results in RTC repair; however, a paucity of evidence regarding these outcomes in massive RTC (MRTC) tear repair exists.

Methods

Patients were identified using the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry Scheme. Pre-operative MRI and medical records were reviewed. A massive RTC tear was defined as the detachment of two or more tendons from their point of insertion on the humeral head. The Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and SF-12 questionnaire were used for evaluation.

Results

Twenty-two patients were studied (72.7 % male; mean age at surgery, 62.6 years). Mean follow up was 14 (range six to 30) months. At six weeks postoperatively, 68 % achieved good or excellent shoulder function as measured by the OSS and Constant score. The cohort’s mean SF-12 physical and emotional scores were significantly lower (p = 0.0002 and 0.037) and the vitality and mental health scores were higher (p = 0.005 and 0.006) than the reference norm scores.

Conclusions

The TOE double row surgical repair for MRTC tears provides good to excellent functional outcomes and is associated with high vitality and mental health scores at a mean of 14 months. Physical and emotional scores were lower than reference norm. These results suggest this repair technique is appropriate for massive rotator cuff tears, and future randomised control studies are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsen FA, Arntz CA, Lippitt SB (1998) Rotator cuff. In: Rockwood C (ed) The Shoulder, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 755–839

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DH, El Attrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA et al (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, Park HK, Yu JW, Seo JB (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single and double row repairs in RTC tears. Am J Sports Med 36:1310–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2007) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galatz L, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:219–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Constant CR, Murley A (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78(4):593–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89-B:1010–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S (1998) SF-12. How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales (Third Edition). QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI

  12. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller S (1996) A 12 Item Short Form Health Survey construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G et al (1998) Cross validation of item selection and scoring for the SF 12 Health Survey in nine countries; results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1171–1178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanusch BC, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A (2009) Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: functional outcome and integrity of the repair after a mini-open procedure. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91(2):201–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam F, Mok D (2004) Open repair of massive RTC tears in patients aged sixty five years or over: is it worthwhile? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:517–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nho SJ, Adler RS, Tomlinson DP, Allen AA, Cordasco FA, Warren RF (2009) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective evaluation with sequential ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 37:1938–1945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toussaint B, Schnaser E, Bosley J, Lefebvre Y, Gobezie R (2011) Early structural and functional outcomes for arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 39(6):1217–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bassey EJ, Morgan K, Dallosso HM, Ebrahim SB (1989) Flexion of the shoulder joint measured as range of abduction in a large representative sample or men and women over 65 years of age. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:353–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakravarty K, Webley M (1993) Shoulder joint movement and its relationship to disability in the elderly. J Rheumatol 20:1359–1361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, Lanzer W, Ilstrup DM, Rowland CM (2001) Surgical repair of chronic RTC tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:71–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerber C, Wirth S, Farshad M (2011) Treatment options for massive RTC tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Romeo A, Hang D, Bach B, Shott S (1999) Repair of full thickness RTC tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:243–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miškulin M, Vrgoč G, Sporiš G, Dulic O, Gavrilovic G, Milanović Z (2015) Single-row arthroscopic cuff repair with double-loaded anchors provides good shoulder function in long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 39(2):233–240

  25. Burkhart S, Adams C, Burkhart S, Schoolfield J (2009) A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy 25(3):274–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul O’Grady.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Connelly, T.M., Shaw, A. & O’Grady, P. Outcome of open massive rotator cuff repairs with double-row suture knotless anchors: case series. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1109–1114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2720-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2720-z

Keywords

Navigation