Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hip joint development in children with type IIb developmental dysplasia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyse the results of treatment of sonographically diagnosed type IIb developmental hip dysplasia and to identify residual hip dysplasia using clinical and radiological assessment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 49 children (59 type IIb and 39 type I hips, according to Graf’s monographic classification) treated in abduction braces. The mean age was 9.1 years (range 4–15) at latest follow-up.

Results

According to the clinical classification of Mckay in Barrett’s modification, all the type I and type IIb hips had very good results. No statistical differences were found between type I and IIb hips when comparing both measured radiological parameters and radiological results according to the Severin classification at latest follow-up. Using our criteria (two or more radiological parameters were outside of their normal range), 12 out of 49 type IIb hips demonstrated persistent dysplasia. Of the 12 hips, eight sonograms were normal at the end of treatment and four patients failed to normalise. No type I hips demonstrated two or more abnormal radiographic parameters at latest follow-up.

Conclusions

Despite obtaining normal sonograms at the end of treatment, some children with type IIb dysplasia may demonstrate radiographic evidence of persistent hip dysplasia over a longer follow-up period. Our results suggest that these children should be monitored until skeletal maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ (1979) The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 3:334–338

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD (1983) Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175:79–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dornacher D, Cakir B, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2010) Early radiological outcome of ultrasound monitoring in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hips. J Pediatr Orthop B 19:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Synder M, Niedzielski K, Grzegorzewski A (2003) Ultrasonografia stawu biodrowego noworodków i niemowląt. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 5:717–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graf R (1980) The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 97:117–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett WP, Staheli LT, Chew DE (1986) The effectiveness of the Salter innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:79–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tönnis D (1987) Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Severin E (1941) Contribution of the knowledge of congenital dislocation of the hip joint. Late results of closed reduction and arthrographic studies of recent cases. Acta Chir Scand 84(Supp 63):1–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Blazer S, Sujov P, Wiener F, Berant M (1999) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence. Pediatrics 103:93–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eastwood DM (2003) Neonatal hip screening. Lancet 361:595–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman DS (1999) Re: How to avoid missing congenital dislocation of the hip. Lancet 354:1490–1491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rachbauer F, Sterzinger W, Klestil T, Krismer M, Frischhut B (1994) Acetabular development following early treatment of hip dysplasia by Pavlik harness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:281–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rafique A, Set P, Berman L (2007) Late presentation of developmental dysplasia of the hip following normal ultrasound examination. Clin Radiol 62:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ihme N, Altenhofen L, von Kries R, Niethard FU (2008) Sonographisches Hüftscreening in Deutschland. Ergebnisse und Vergleichmitanderen Screeningverfahren. Orthopade 37:541–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Graf R (2006) Hip sonography. Diagnosis and management of infant hip dysplasia, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gardiner HM, Dunn PM (1990) Controlled trial of immediate splinting versus ultrasonographic surveillance in congenitally dislocatable hips. Lancet 336:1553–1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paton RW, Hinduja K, Thomas CD (2005) The significance of at-risk factors in ultrasound surveillance of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1264–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roovers EA, Boere-Boonekamp MM, Mostert AK, Castelein RM, Zielhuis GA, Kerkhoff TH (2005) The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip: sonographic findings in infants of 1–3 months of age. J Pediatr Orthop B 14:325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Osarumwense D, Popple D, Kershaw IF, Kershaw CJ, Furlong AJ (2007) What follow-up is required for children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip? J Pediatr Orthop B 16:399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The article was not financially supported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Sibiński.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sibiński, M., Adamczyk, E., Higgs, Z.C.J. et al. Hip joint development in children with type IIb developmental dysplasia. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 1243–1246 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1447-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1447-8

Keywords

Navigation