Abstract
Background: We evaluated the differences in sample adequacy and safety between a transseptal needle and Quick-core biopsy needle for transjugular liver biopsy.
Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients who had a bleeding diatheses and/or ascites underwent transjugular liver biopsy using a transseptal needle (11 patients) and Quick-core biopsy needle (seven patients). The length of the specimens was measured before fixation. A pathologist reviewed histologic slides for sample adequacy and pathologic diagnoses. Clinical records were reviewed for complication.
Results: In all patients, liver biopsy was successful. A total of 45 specimens were obtained, with an average of 2.5 passes per patient. The length of specimen was significantly longer with the Quick-core biopsy needle than with the transseptal needle (p < 0.05). Biopsied tissue was fragmented in 17 of 25 specimens with the transseptal needle but not fragmented in any specimen with the Quick-core biopsy needle. All specimens were determined to be adequate except one with the transseptal needle. There was no early or delayed complication in any patient.
Conclusion: Transjugular liver biopsy is a safe and effective procedure without any significant difference in complication and adequacy when using a transseptal needle or Quick-core biopsy needle. Larger specimens can be obtained without tissue fragmentation with the Quick-core biopsy needle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 30 August 1999/Revision accepted: 26 January 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choo, S., Do, Y., Park, K. et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: modified Ross transseptal needle versus Quick-core biopsy needle. Abdom Imaging 25, 483–485 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000043