Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Posterior pelvic floor disorders and obstructed defecation syndrome: Clinical and therapeutic approach

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are no clear recommended imaging guidelines for the assessment of patients presenting primarily with obstructed defecation syndrome and defecation difficulty. The gold standard has always been the defecating proctogram which may require a rather poorly tolerated extended technique involving high-radiation exposure in young women which includes cystography, vaginography, small bowel opacification, and occasional peritoneography. The development of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging has obviated many of these extended techniques and may be supplemented by novel ultrasonographic methods including dynamic transperineal sonography, real-time 3D translabial ultrasound and 3D dynamic echodefecography. Patients potentially suitable for surgical treatment display a multiplicity of pelvic floor and perineal soft-tissue anomalies where one pathology (such as rectocele or enterocele) are considered dominant. Despite the introduction of recent stapled and robotic technologies, there is a dual dialog concerning the functional outcome of these procedures. Imaging and surgical algorithms for these patients are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarles JC, Arnaud A, Selezneff I, Olivier S (1989) Endo-rectal repair of rectocele. Int J Colorect Dis 4:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zbar A, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorect Dis 18:369–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, Hale DS, Benson JT (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Halligan S, Bartram CI (1995) Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant? Dis Colon Rectum 38:764–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stojkovic SG, Balfour L, Burke D, Finan PJ, Sagar PM (2011) Does the need to self-digitate or the presence of a large or nonemptying rectocele or proctography influence the outcome of transanal rectocele repair? Dis Colon Rectum 54:412–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR (2000) Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1556–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oom DM, van Dijl VR, Gosselink MP, van Wijk JJ, Schouten WR (2007) Enterocele repair by abdominal obliteration of the pelvic inlet: long-term outcome on obstructed defecation and symptoms of pelvic discomfort. Colorectal Dis 9:845–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bremmer S, Mellgren A, Holmström B, López A, Udén R (1997) Peritoneocele: visualization with defecography and peritoneography performed simultaneously. Radiology 202:373–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. López A, Anzén B, Bremmer S, et al. (2002) Cystodefecoperitoneography in patients with genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:22–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goei R, Kemerink G (1990) Radiation dose in defecography. Radiology 178:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Otto SD, Oesterheld A, Ritz JP, et al. (2011) Rectal anatomy after rectopexy: cinedefecography versus MR-defecography. J Surg Res 165:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peschers UM, DeLancey JO, Schaer GN, Schuessler B (1997) Exoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter: normal anatomy and sphincter defects. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104:999–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzili N, et al. (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:239–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorect Dis 2004; 19: 60–67

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Hoyte LPJ, Steensma AB (2007) Atlas of pelvic floor ultrasound. London: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  17. Regadas FS, Haas EM, Abbas MA, et al. (2011) Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecofgraphy in the assessment of anorectal dysfunction in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 54:686–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pecatori M, Bartram CI, Zbar AP (2006) Clinical ultrasound in benign proctology: 2D and 3D anal, vaginal and transperineal techniques. New York: Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M (2009) Section Vi.3 Clinical dynamic transperineal ultrasonography in proctologic practice: the case for its use in patients presenting with evacuatory difficulty. In: Santoro GA, di Falco G, (ed). Benign anorectal diseases: diagnosis with endoanal and endorectal ultrasound and new treatment options, Springer, New York, pp 219–230

  20. Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Santoro GA, et al. (2011) Pelvic floor disorders: role of new ultrasonographic techniques. World J Urol 29:615–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Longo A. Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal resection (STARR). In: Proceedings 14th annual international cleveland clinic colorectal disease symposium, Ft. Lauderdale, 13–15 Feb 2004.

  22. Schwandner O, Stuto A, Jayne D, et al. (2008) Decision-making algorithm for the STARR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome: position statement of the group of STARR pioneers. Surg Innov 15:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A (2009) Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 52(7): 1205–1212 (discussion 1212-4)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Corman ML, Carriero A, Herold A, et al. (2006) Consensus conference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for disordered defecation. Colorect Dis 8:98–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arroyo A, González-Argenté FX, García-Domingo M, et al. (2008) Prospective multicentre clinical trial of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructive defecation syndrome. Br J Surg 95:1521–1527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frascio M, Stabilini C, Ricci B, et al. (2008) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction syndrome: results and follow-up. World J Surg 32:1110–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Renzi A, Talento P, Giardiello C, et al. (2008) Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) by a new dedicated device for the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele: early results of a multicenter prospective study. Int J Colorect Dis 23:999–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wadhawan H, Shorthouse AJ, Brown SR (2010) Surgery for obstructed defecation: does the use of the Contour device (Trans-STARR) improve results? Colorectal Dis 12:885–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G (2011) What is the benefit of a new stapler device in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation? Three-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Cobellis L, Bottini C, Tessera G (2006) Rectal pocket syndrome after stapled mucosectomy. Colorect Dis 8:808–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C, Zbar A (2005) Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defecation. Int J Colorect Dis 20:83–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mongardini M, Custureri FF, Schillaci F, et al. (2005) Prevention of post-operative pain and haemorrhage in PPH (procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids) and STARR (stapled trans-anal rectal resection). Preliminary results in 261 cases. G Chir 26:157–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF, et al. (2008) Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR). Results outcome predictors and complications after stapled transanal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 51:186–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pescatori M, Zbar AP (2009) Reinterventions after complicated or failed STARR procedure. Int J Colorect Dis 24:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meurette G, Wong M, Frampas E, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2010) Anatomical and functional results after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis Sep 21 (Eub ahead of print). doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02415.x

  36. Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Bhoot NH, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2011) Patient satisfaction and symptomatic outcomes following stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. J Surg Res 165:e15–e21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kapoor DS, Sultan AH, Thakar R, et al. (2008) Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic. Colorect Dis 10:118–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Russo A, Pescatori M (2010) Psychological assessment of patients with proctological disorders. In: Wexner SD, Zbar AP, Pescatori M, (eds). Complex anorectal disorders: investigation and management, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 747–760

  39. Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M, et al. (2008) ODS II Study Group. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1611–1618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ambe P, Weber SA, Esfahani BJ, Köhler L (2011) Obstructed defecation: what is the role of rehabilitation. Dtsch Med Woschenschr 136:586–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Solé LI, Bolino MC, Lueso M, et al. (2009) Prevalence of sexual and physical abuse in patients with obstructed defecation: impact of biofeedback treatment. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 101:464–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ayabaca SM, Zbar AP, Pescatori M (2002) Anal continence after rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Muerette G, Lehur P-A (2009) Commentary: STARR and Trans-STARR procedures. Colorectal Dis 11:828–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rhoads KF, Garcia-Aguilar J Anismus (2010) In: Wexner SD, Zbar AP, Pescatori M, (eds). Complex anorectal disorders: investigation and management, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, London, pp 461–493

  45. DeNardi P, Bottini C, Faticanti Scucchi L, Palazzi A, Pescatori M (2007) Proctalgia in a patient with staples retained in the puborectalis muscle after STARR operation. Tech Coloproctol 11:353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schwandner T, Roblick MH, Hecker A, et al. (2009) Transvaginal rectal repair: a new treatment option for symptomatic rectocele? Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1429–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S, et al. (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183:257–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lechaux J, Lechaux D, Bataille P, Bars I (2004) Transperineal repair of rectocele with prosthetic mesh: a prospective study. Ann Chir 129:211–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Harris MA, Ferrara A, Gallagher J, et al. (2009) Stapled transanal rectal resection vs. transvaginal rectocele repair for treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 52:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Arnold MW, Stewart WR, Aguilar PS (1990) Rectocele repair. Four years experience. Dis Colon Rectum 33:684–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabro G, et al. (2001) Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists. Tech Coloproctol 5:149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Farid M, Madbouly KM, Hussein A, et al. (2010) Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J Surg 34:822–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. D’Hoore A, Vanbeckevoort D, Penninckx F (2008) Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele. Br J Surg 95:1264–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Portier G, Kirzin S, Cabarrot P, Queralto M, Lazorthes F (2011) The effect of abdominal ventral rectopexy on fecal incontinence and constipation with internal intra-anal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 13:914–917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong MT, Abet E, Rigaud J, Frampas E, Lehur PA, Meurette G (2011) Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele: impact on anorectal and sexual function. Colorectal Dis 13: e320–e326

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54:342–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zbar AP, Ansari A (2008) Correspondence to D’Hoore. Br J Surg 95:1264–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zbar AP, Ansari A (2009) Correspondence to D’Hoore. Br J Surg 96:322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Moscowitz AV (1912) The pathogenesis and anatomy and care of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 15:7–21

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR (1999) Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:859–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Beer-Gabel M, Assoulin Y, Amitai M, Bardan E (2008) A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:513–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, Granata V, Uricuoli L,Alabiso ME, Di Grezia G, Marano I, Gatta G, Grassi R (2011) Dynamic MRI defecography vs. Entero-colpo-cyst-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorect Dis 26: 1191–1196

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Reiser M (2000) Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 43:205–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Carriero A, Picchio M, Martellucci J, et al. (2010) Laparoscopic correction of enterocele associated to stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv Israel Affiliated with Sackler Medical School and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Andrew P. Zbar

Authors
  1. Andrew P. Zbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Zbar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zbar, A.P. Posterior pelvic floor disorders and obstructed defecation syndrome: Clinical and therapeutic approach. Abdom Imaging 38, 894–902 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9878-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9878-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation