Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common and debilitating condition with physical, psychological, and pharmacological aetiologies. The physical causes can be divided into problems with arterial inflow, structural penile abnormalities, or problems with the venous occlusion mechanism. Penile Doppler sonography is a specialized technique requiring a thorough knowledge of the topic in order to aid diagnosis and direct subsequent treatment. This technique is indicated in those patients with erectile dysfunction who do not respond to oral pharmacological agents (e.g., PDE-5 inhibitors). This pictorial essay will visit the anatomy and physiology of penile erection, the technique for performing the procedure, and review the imaging features for specific causes of ED.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA, 1993. 270(1):83–90
Feldman H.A., et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol, 1994. 151(1):54–61
Altinkilic B., E.W. Hauck W. Weidner. Evaluation of penile perfusion by color-coded duplex sonography in the management of erectile dysfunction. World J Urol, 2004. 22(5):361–4
Lue T.F., et al. Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Radiology, 1985. 155(3):777–81
Speel T.G., et al. The value of sildenafil as mode of stimulation in pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography. Int J Impot Res, 2001. 13(4):189–91
Meuleman E.J., W.L. Diemont. Investigation of erectile dysfunction. Diagnostic testing for vascular factors in erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am, 1995. 22(4): 803–19
Bahren W., et al. Arterial anatomy and arteriographic diagnosis of arteriogenic impotence. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1988. 11(4):195–210
Quam J.P., et al., Duplex and color Doppler sonographic evaluation of vasculogenic impotence. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1989. 153(6):1141–7
Fitzgerald S.W., et al., Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction. Radiographics, 1992. 12(1):3–17 discussion 18–9
Golijanin D., et al., Doppler evaluation of erectile dysfunction - part 1. Int J Impot Res, 2007. 19(1):37–42
Connolly J.A., S. Borirakchanyavat, T.F. Lue. Ultrasound evaluation of the penis for assessment of impotence. J Clin Ultrasound, 1996. 24(8):481–6
Wilkins C.J., S. Sriprasad P.S. Sidhu. Color Doppler ultrasound of the penis. Clin Radiol, 2003. 58(7):514–23
Aversa A., R. Bruzziches, G. Spera. Diagnosing erectile dysfunction: the penile dynamic color duplex ultrasound revisited. Int J Androl, 2005. 28(Suppl 2):61–3
Gontero P., et al. Phentolamine re-dosing during penile dynamic color Doppler ultrasound: a practical method to abolish a false diagnosis of venous leakage in patients with erectile dysfunction. Br J Radiol, 2004. 77(923):922–6
Kim S.H., et al. Doppler sonography of deep cavernosal artery of the penis: variation of peak systolic velocity according to sampling location. J Ultrasound Med, 1994. 13(8):591–4
Montorsi F., et al. The effect of intracorporeal injection plus genital and audiovisual sexual stimulation versus second injection on penile color Doppler sonography parameters. J Urol 1996. 155(2):536–40
Katlowitz N.M., et al. Potentiation of drug-induced erection with audiovisual sexual stimulation. Urology 1993. 41(5):431–4
Donatucci C.F., T.F. Lue. The combined intracavernous injection and stimulation test: diagnostic accuracy. J Urol 1992. 148(1):61–2
Mancini M., et al. The presence of arterial anatomical variations can affect the results of duplex sonographic evaluation of penile vessels in impotent patients. J Urol 1996. 155(6):1919–23
Schwartz A.N., et al. Evaluation of normal erectile function with color flow Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1989. 153(6):1155–60
Benson C.B., J.E. Aruny M.A. Vickers Jr., Correlation of duplex sonography with arteriography in patients with erectile dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1993. 160(1):71–3
Benson C.B., M.A. Vickers. Sexual impotence caused by vascular disease: diagnosis with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989. 153(6):1149–53
Collins J.P., B.J. Lewandowski. Experience with intracorporeal injection of papaverine and duplex ultrasound scanning for assessment of arteriogenic impotence. Br J Urol 1987. 59(1):84–8
Fitzgerald S.W., et al. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: patterns of temporal response to papaverine. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1991. 157(2):331–6
Patel U., et al. Color flow and spectral Doppler imaging after papaverine-induced penile erection in 220 impotent men: study of temporal patterns and the importance of repeated sampling, velocity asymmetry and vascular anomalies. Clin Radiol 1993. 48(1):18–24
Nisen H.O., et al. Duplex Doppler scanning with prostaglandin E1 in the diagnosis of cavernovenous leakage. Acta Radiol, 1993. 34(4):335–8
Naroda T., et al. [Clinical studies for venogenic impotence with color Doppler ultrasonography--evaluation of resistance index of the cavernous artery]. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1996. 87(11):1231–5
Bassiouny H.S., L.A. Levine Penile duplex sonography in the diagnosis of venogenic impotence. J Vasc Surg, 1991. 13(1):75–82 discussion 82–3
Fowlis G.A., et al. Preliminary report--combined surgical and radiological penile vein occlusion for the management of impotence caused by venous-sinusoidal incompetence. Br J Urol, 1994. 74(4):492–6
Schwarzer U., et al. The prevalence of Peyronie's disease: results of a large survey. BJU Int, 2001. 88(7):727–30
Golijanin D., et al. Doppler evaluation of erectile dysfunction - part 2. Int J Impot Res, 2007. 19(1):43–8
Kadioglu A., et al. Color Doppler ultrasound assessment of penile vascular system in men with Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res, 2000. 12(5):263–7
Lopez J.A., J.P. Jarow. Penile vascular evaluation of men with Peyronie's disease. J Urol 1993. 149(1):53–5
Devine C.J. Jr., C.E. Horton. Peyronie's disease. Clin Plast Surg, 1988. 15(3):405–9
Weidner W., et al. Sexual dysfunction in Peyronie's disease: an analysis of 222 patients without previous local plaque therapy. J Urol, 1997. 157(1): p. 325–8
Montorsi F., et al. Vascular abnormalities in Peyronie's disease: the role of color Doppler sonography. J Urol, 1994. 151(2): p. 373–5
Brock G., A. Kadioglu, T.F. Lue, Peyronie's disease: a modified treatment. Urology, 1993. 42(3):300–4
Ohebshalom M., et al. Measurement of penile curvature in Peyronie's disease patients: comparison of three methods. J Sex Med, 2007. 4(1):199–203
Pautler S.E., G.B. Brock, Priapism. From Priapus to the present time. Urol Clin North Am, 2001. 28(2):391–403
Spycher M.A., D. Hauri. The ultrastructure of the erectile tissue in priapism. J Urol, 1986. 135(1):142–7
Burt F.B., H.K. Schirmer W.W. Scott, A new concept in the management of priapism. J Urol, 1960. 83:60–1
Bastuba M.D., et al. Arterial priapism: diagnosis, treatment and long-term follow up. J Urol, 1994. 151(5):1231–7
Carter R.G., C.E. Thomas G.C. Tomskey. Cavernospongiosum shunts in treatment of priapism. Urology, 1976. 7(3):292–5
Bartsch G., Jr., et al. High-flow priapism: color-Doppler ultrasound-guided supraselective embolization therapy. World J Urol 2004. 22(5):368–70
Orvis B.R., J.W. McAninch, Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am, 1989. 16(2):369–75
Morris S.B., M.A. Miller K. Anson. Management of penile fracture. J R Soc Med, 1998. 91(8): p. 427–8
El-Bahnasawy M.S., M.A. Gomha. Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Int J Impot Res, 2000. 12(5):273–7
Gontero P., P.S. Sidhu G.H. Muir, Penile fracture repair: assessment of early results and complications using color Doppler ultrasound. Int J Impot Res, 2000. 12(2):125–8; discussion 128–9
Kalash S.S., J.D. Young Jr., Fracture of penis: controversy of surgical versus conservative treatment. Urology, 1984. 24(1):21–4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halls, J., Bydawell, G. & Patel, U. Erectile dysfunction: the role of penile Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 34, 712–725 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9463-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9463-x