Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance enteroclysis compared with conventional enteroclysis and computed tomography enteroclysis: a critically appraised topic

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent advances in CT and MR technology, particularly the advent of multidetector CT (MDCT), the advent of rapidly changing gradients in industry standard MRI scanners, enabling ultrafast sequences, have led to an expansion in the role of cross sectional imaging in the investigation of small bowel disorders. We conducted an evidence-based review of MR enteroclysis (MRE) and how it performs in comparison to CT enteroclysis (CTE) and the gold standard of conventional enteroclysis (CE) for diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease and small bowel neoplasia. We used the standard 5 step evidence-based medicine method of ask, search, appraise, apply and evaluate. We found 3 relevant level 1B studies, and one level 3B study. No studies evaluating MRE in small bowel neoplasia were found. MRE does not perform as well as CE in evaluation of fine mucosal detail, but the additional extraluminal detail, and absence of ionising radiation enhances its overall performance. It was not possible to establish the relative diagnostic performances of MRE and CTE from existing literature. CTE does involve patient irradiation. For patients in whom jejunal intubation and enteroclysis is considered to evaluate the small bowel, MRE should be considered the first-line investigation, local resources and expertise permitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2—asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242(1):23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haynes RB (2001) Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence. Evid Based Ment Health 4(2):37–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Entrez PubMed. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed. Date Accessed May 5th 2007

  4. Levels of evidence Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. Date Accessed May 5th 2007

  5. Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4–appraise and apply diagnostic radiology literature. Radiology 242(2):342–354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodd JD, MacEneaney PM, Malone DE (2004) Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature. Eur Radiol 14(5):915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G et al (2006) Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16(9):1915–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Masselli G, Brizi MG, Menchini L et al (2005) Magnetic Resonance Enteroclysis imaging of Crohn’s. Radiol Med 110(3):221–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Darbari A, Sena L, Argani P et al (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10(2):67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY et al (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 13(6):1303–1311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cancer in Ireland 1994–2001 Incidence, mortality and treatment, National Cancer Registry of Ireland 2005

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the extensive advice and assistance of Dr Dermot Malone, in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ronan Ryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, E.R., Heaslip, I.S.E. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis compared with conventional enteroclysis and computed tomography enteroclysis: a critically appraised topic. Abdom Imaging 33, 34–37 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9308-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9308-z

Keywords

Navigation