Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaging features of postpartum uterine rupture: a case report

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a case report on a postpartum uterine rupture with the history of a previous cesarean section. During the diagnosis of rupture, ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging of the uterus were obtained. Ultrasound examination did not result in substantial information. CT and magnetic resonance imaging established the correct diagnosis. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, and the diagnosis was confirmed. Diagnostic qualifications of these three instruments were compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagaya K, Fetters MD, Ishikawa M, et al. (2000) Causes of maternal mortality in Japan. JAMA 283:2661–2667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DA, Goodwin TM, Gherman RB, et al. (1997) Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 89:671–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhaus W, Bauerschmitz G, Gohring U, et al. (2001) Risk of uterine rupture after cesarean section–analysis of 1,086 births. Zentralbl Gynakol 123:148–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brill Y, Kingdom J, Thomas J, et al. (2003) The management of VBAC at term: a survey of Canadian obstetricians. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 25:300–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherer DM, Abulafia O, Anyaegbunam AM (1998) Intra- and early postpartum ultrasonography: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv 53:107–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowdermilk C, Gavant ML, Qaisi W, et al. (1999) Screening helical CT for evaluation of blunt traumatic injury in the pregnant patient. Radiographics 19:S243–S255; discussion S256–248

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rooholamini SA, Au AH, Hansen GC, et al. (1993) Imaging of pregnancy-related complications. Radiographics 13:753–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Iwasaku K, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in gynecologic emergencies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:564–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ (2004) MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Radiographics 24:1301–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

    Recep Has, Samet Topuz, Ibrahim Kalelioglu & Demet Tagrikulu

  2. Yazıcı apt. 14/1 Daire 4, Altunizade, Istanbul, Turkey

    Samet Topuz

Authors
  1. Recep Has
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samet Topuz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ibrahim Kalelioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Demet Tagrikulu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samet Topuz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Has, R., Topuz, S., Kalelioglu, I. et al. Imaging features of postpartum uterine rupture: a case report. Abdom Imaging 33, 101–103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9206-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9206-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation