Skip to main content
Log in

A microdose clinical trial to evaluate [18F]Florastamin as a positron emission tomography imaging agent in patients with prostate cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the biodistribution of [18F]Florastamin, a novel 18F-labelled positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Methods

PET was performed for five healthy controls and 10 patients with prostate cancer at 0, 10, 30, 70, and 120 mins after injecting 370 MBq of [18F]Florastamin. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) was evaluated in the primary tumour. The mean SUVmax (SUVmean) was evaluated in normal organs. Furthermore, the residence time was evaluated by assessing radioactivity in each organ. The internal radiation dosimetry was calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software.

Results

The SUVmax in primary tumours increased with time. A favourable tumour to background ratio was also observed over time. Multiple lymph nodes and bone metastases were also evaluated and showed a similar pattern to SUVmax in the primary tumour. In one patient, a tiny lymph node metastasis was identified using [18F]Florastamin PET, which was not observed using other modalities, and was histologically confirmed. The highest absorbed dose was observed in the kidney (0.062 ± 0.015 mGy/MBq), followed by the bladder (0.032 ± 0.013 mGy/MBq), liver (0.022 ± 0.006 mGy/MBq), and salivary gland (0.018 ± 0.006 mGy/MBq). The effective dose with a 370 MBq injection of [18F]Florastamin was 1.81 mSv. No adverse events related to [18F]Florastamin were reported.

Conclusion

We identified a novel PSMA-targeted PET ligand, [18F]Florastamin, for imaging prostate cancer. [18F]Florastamin showed a high SUVmax and relatively high tumour to background ratio in both primary tumour and metastatic lesions, which suggests its high sensitivity to detect tumours without any adverse events.

Trial registration

KCT0003924 registered at https://cris.nih.go.kr/.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Galgano SJ, Valentin R, McConathy J. Role of PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following primary treatment for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(Suppl 4):S462–s76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Natarajan A, Agrawal A, Murthy V, Bakshi G, Joshi A, Purandare N, et al. Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients. World J Nucl Med. 2019;18(3):244–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oh SW, Cheon GJ. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging in prostate cancer: opportunities and challenges. Korean J Radiol. 2018;19(5):819–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giesel FL, Hadaschik B, Cardinale J, Radtke J, Vinsensia M, Lehnert W, et al. F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(4):678–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee B, Chu S, Jung H, Yang S, Jung W, Moon H, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1,2,3-triazolelinked 18F-labled PET tracers for imaging of PSMA [abstract]. In: Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine October 13–17, 2018 Düsseldorf, Germany. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(1):S40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, et al. Initial evaluation of [18F]DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(4):565–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Behr SC, Aggarwal R, VanBrocklin HF, Flavell RR, Gao K, Small EJ, et al. Phase I Study of CTT1057, an (18)F-labeled imaging agent with phosphoramidate core targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):910–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, Inoue T, Shimizu Y, Kimura H, et al. Initial evaluation of PET/CT with 18F-FSU-880 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(2):742–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Piron S, De Man K, Van Laeken N, D'Asseler Y, Bacher K, Kersemans K, et al. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 18F-PSMA-11 for PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(12):1736–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hohberg M, Kobe C, Krapf P, Tager P, Hammes J, Dietlein F, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-JK-PSMA-7 as a novel prostate-specific membrane antigen-specific ligand for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9(1):66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh SW, Wurzer A, Teoh EJ, Oh S, Langbein T, Kronke M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of biodistribution and PET image quality of novel radiohybrid PSMA, 18F- rhPSMA-7, in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234609.

  13. Mena E, Lindenberg ML, Shih JH, Adler S, Harmon S, Bergvall E, et al. Clinical impact of PSMA-based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after primary local therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(1):4–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mena E, Lindenberg ML, Turkbey IB, Shih JH, Harmon SA, Lim I, et al. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence prostate cancer after primary local therapy. J Nucl Med. 2019.

  15. Walker SM, Lim I, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers for prostate cancer imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02427-4.

  16. Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, Benesova M, Eder M, Neels OC, et al. The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(11):1697–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, et al. Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(5):668–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Werner RA, Derlin T, Lapa C, Sheikbahaei S, Higuchi T, Giesel FL, et al. 18F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging. Theranostics. 2020;10(1):1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea (No. 50547-2020) and in part with a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea (No. 2019M2D2A1A02057204). [18F]Florastamin was supported by FutureChem Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design of this study. Inki Lee, Chansoo Park, Jongwook Park, and Kanghyon Song contributed to the collection and assembly of data. Inki Lee, Ilhan Lim, Byung Hyun Byun, Byung Il Kim, Chang Woon Choi, Sang-Keun Woo, Kyo Chul Lee, and Joo Hyun Kang contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. Inki Lee, Ilhan Lim, Sang-Keun Woo, and Hee Seup Kil contributed to drafting the work and revising it critically for important content and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ilhan Lim or Kanghyon Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Hee Seup Kil and Chansoo Park are employees of FutureChem Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea. Dae Yoon Chi is now an employee of FutureChem Co., Ltd. as Chief executive officer. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), and the Institutional Review Board of KIRAMS (IRB No.: KIRAMS 2018-12-006-003). All procedures were performed following the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This clinical trial has been registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (https://cris.nih.go.kr), registration number KCT0003924.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kanghyon Song and Ilhan Lim should be considered joint corresponding authors.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology - Genitourinary.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 3088 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, I., Lim, I., Byun, B.H. et al. A microdose clinical trial to evaluate [18F]Florastamin as a positron emission tomography imaging agent in patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48, 95–102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04883-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04883-y

Keywords

Navigation