The complex biology of atherosclerosis has been approached by functional imaging from multiple directions, each exploring the specific and distinctive etiopathogenetic mechanisms underlying its formation and progression as well as its subsequent complications [1–5]. In a review published in this journal [2], the targets and the radiopharmaceuticals with their targeting characteristics were classified into four major groups: (1) atherosclerotic lesion components (targets include foam cells, lipoproteins, lipids, endothelin); (2) inflammation (targeting metabolic glucose activity, macrophages and monocytes, neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes, lymphocytes); (3) thrombosis (targeting platelets, activated platelets, fibrins, etc.); and (4) apoptosis. In addition to these aforementioned enumerated targets, there have been recent endeavors to detect and image active arterial calcification with 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET)/CT [6–9]. This novel approach, which requires further critical evaluation in experimental and clinical studies, opens up the possibility of a new armamentarium of functional imaging in the evaluation of this complex disease process. In this comment, we explore some demonstrated promises and take a look at future prospects and limitations of this for being translated into a clinical reality.
The association of aortic calcification with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality has been emphasized in several reports. Inflammation and calcification are two dynamic and complex processes that are integral components in various pathophysiological steps of atherogenesis. Arterial calcification has been traditionally determined by CT, whereas inflammation mainly mediated by macrophage activity has been assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET over the last few years. The increasing use of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET has raised the theoretical possibility of studying active mineral deposition in the atherosclerotic plaque perhaps years or even decades earlier than previously.
To date there have been five clinical studies [6–10] that have explored the feasibility of using 18F-NaF PET/CT in assessing the calcification component of atherosclerosis. Derlin et al., in a retrospective study [6], evaluated the prevalence, location, and topographic relationship of 18F-NaF accumulation and vascular calcification in major arteries. On a patient-specific analysis, 18F-NaF uptake was observed at 254 sites in 76%, and CT calcification was observed at 1,930 sites in 84% of the 75 study patients. On a lesion-by-lesion analysis, colocalization of radiotracer accumulation and CT calcification was observed in 88% of the PET-positive lesions, whereas only 12% of all arterial CT calcification sites showed increased radiotracer uptake. The investigators also observed that a higher prevalence of 18F-NaF uptake visibility is related to a degree of calcification; however, they found no significant correlation between the intensity of radiotracer uptake [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)] and the calcification score [6]. Interestingly, the per patient colocalization of 18F-NaF uptake and CT calcification was found to be substantially higher than the previously reported rates of <2% and 7% concordance of 18F-FDG and CT calcification in other studies, one of which showed a change in the FDG uptake pattern in about half of the patients at repeat imaging 8–26 months apart with virtually no change in CT calcifications [11–13].
In a separate study [7] by the same group of authors, where the correlation between 18F-NaF and arterial wall calcification in the common carotid arteries was evaluated using a semiquantitative SUVmax technique [by placing an individual region of interest (ROI) around the lesion on coregistered transaxial PET/CT images], there was a significant correlation between (a) 18F-NaF uptake and arterial wall calcification as well as between (b) the degree of radiotracer uptake (SUVmax) and both calcification score and calcified lesion thickness in the atherosclerotic plaque. 18F-NaF uptake in calcifying carotid plaque had significant correlation with cardiovascular risk factors such as age, male sex, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and cumulative smoking exposure. The prevalence of carotid 18F-NaF accumulation increased with the number of risk factors.
In a recently published retrospective analysis [8], where the fluoride uptake and calcification in major arteries (including coronary arteries) were analyzed by both visual assessment and SUV measurement, there was evidence of significant correlation between history of cardiovascular events and presence of fluoride uptake in coronary arteries. The coronary fluoride uptake value in patients with cardiovascular events was significantly higher than in patients without cardiovascular events. The authors concluded that 18F-NaF PET/CT might be useful in the evaluation of the atherosclerotic process in major arteries, including coronary arteries, and that an increased fluoride uptake in coronary arteries may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk.
In an animal study performed at the University of Pennsylvania (unpublished data), the potential of 18F-NaF PET/CT in detecting molecular calcification of heart and major vessels of diabetic pigs was studied. These animals were examined at different stages of the disease with both 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF. Interestingly, the investigators were able to visualize molecular calcification in the heart and lower lumbar aorta of diabetic pigs using 18F-NaF prior to visualization of any visible calcification in the CT images (Fig. 1).
In a novel study by Beheshti et al. [9], the authors introduced a new concept for calculating global calcification as a sensitive biomarker for detection of early molecular and cellular calcification in the atherosclerotic plaques (Fig. 2). The concept was primarily based upon the concept of global disease burden, which had been earlier employed using FDG PET in a different scenario. The feasibility of 18F-NaF PET/CT for the quantification of global molecular calcification of the heart and aorta was examined in this study. Fifty-one patients with a variety of malignancies who had undergone 18F-NaF PET/CT for skeletal evaluation were selected for the analysis. Quantitative analysis was performed by drawing an ellipsoid ROI on the cardiac silhouette on each CT slice and corresponding PET slice all over the heart. The molecular calcification score of each particular slice was calculated by multiplying slice volume (calculated by multiplying the area on the ROI by the slice thickness) by the mean SUV of each ROI. The cardiac global molecular calcification score was then obtained by adding the molecular calcification scores among the entire set of calculated ROIs. In this study, the authors observed that 18F-NaF uptake in the heart and aorta increased significantly with advancing age. Hence, they inferred from these preliminary data that 18F-NaF PET/CT may make it feasible to measure the regional and global calcification of the heart and major arteries.
In a recently reported interesting study by Derlin et al. [10], the macrophage activity was determined by 18F-FDG PET and ongoing mineral deposition was measured by 18F-NaF PET in atherosclerotic plaque and these findings were correlated with calcified plaque burden estimated by CT. Both qualitative and semi quantitative analysis was performed, and the ROIs were drawn around the visually assessed lesions on coregistered transaxial PET/CT images manually. The findings of this study suggested the distinctive nature of the pathogenetic processes and hence would indicate complex interactions between them ongoing in an atherosclerotic plaque. Also, the investigators hypothesized that 18F-NaF PET would depict active mineral deposition and provide functional information about the activity of the calcification process, whereas CT could only demonstrate the presence of mere calcification [10].
As mentioned, one of the major strengths of 18F-NaF PET/CT is its ability to demonstrate and assess what is assumed to be active mineral deposition in the atherosclerotic plaque. CT calcification, on the other hand, is likely to be influenced by both active and passive processes, the latter, associated with necrosis, being presumed to be less important in the study of atherosclerotic plaque, since it is frequently observed in advanced atherosclerotic lesions [14, 15]. Interestingly, though CT calcification is now considered a powerful risk marker, it does not agree very well in asymptomatic subjects with clinical risk score algorithms like the HeartScore [16]. In a screening study involving 1,825 individuals, CT coronary artery calcification (CAC) was found to be common in healthy middle-aged individuals with a low HeartScore, and, on the contrary, high-risk subjects very frequently did not have CAC. It is theoretically possible that 18F-NaF PET/CT may provide highly relevant information about ongoing active molecular calcification in the plaque which might be before structural calcification is detectable by standard CT techniques. Atheromatosis appears to be a lifelong process of active and passive phases not synchronized, but at different stages at various sites of the arterial system. Thus, it appears reasonable to imagine increased FDG uptake signaling macrophage infiltration as one of the very earliest signs of active local atheromatosis and NaF accumulation as a marker of succeeding incipient molecular calcification, which may or may not result in overt calcification detectable by CT. It is tempting to speculate that here could be a key to the detection, characterization, and quantification of the active atheromatosis process in the individual patient early enough to allow for intervention long before symptoms may appear. The influence of partial volume effect on the visualization of 18F-NaF uptake in the PET/CT may be considered a limitation. However, with the development of sophisticated techniques and software for partial volume correction and adoption of the global molecular calcification score technique, this limitation might be obviated in the future.
The phenomenon of atherosclerosis is a complex and dynamic process that involves various mechanisms ongoing at different time points of its evolution. Functional imaging critically looking into each of these distinctive processes can provide insight into their formation, progression, vulnerability, and resulting atherothrombotic complications. The concept of the vulnerable coronary plaque, i.e., the soft, lipid-filled endothelial swelling with a fibrous cap that may disrupt and cause a cascade of thromboembolic processes leading to occlusion and acute myocardial infarction more often than narrow calcified stenoses, has led to a search for methods that can detect these culprit lesions in the coronary bed [2, 17]. Further, it has served as a basis for the creation of a novel practice guideline for cardiovascular screening in the asymptomatic at-risk population. The main clinical purpose of noninvasive tests for subclinical atherosclerosis in cardiovascular risk assessment is to target intensified preventive care to those at highest risk. Thus, in the opinion of some, men over a certain age with certain cardiac risk factors should be given prophylactic treatment with statins to stabilize potential vulnerable plaques, the net result supposedly being a massive reduction in coronary events [18, 19]. However, these drugs are not without side effects and the consequences of long-term population-based treatment are still not known. Therefore, today’s trend toward personalized diagnosis and therapy seems immediately more attractive. For years it has been tried to image coronary lesions by either single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or PET. Except for a few promising reports [20, 21], attempts to visualize the vulnerable plaque have on the whole been disappointing due to a series of limiting factors [1, 2, 22]. However, with the idea of measuring global molecular cardiovascular calcification conceptually years, perhaps decades, before it becomes macroscopically visible, things may change dramatically. Thus, active molecular calcification may be assessed by 18F-NaF PET/CT much earlier than the detectable calcification identified by CT and, hence, provide clinically relevant information in the individual patient at an early stage when medical intervention is likely to have correspondingly greater effect. 18F-NaF PET/CT could provide a bridging gap between the FDG depicted inflammatory component and the CT depicted organized calcification. Further research in this area will hopefully generate more interesting data that will clarify the complex interactions between the various underlying mechanisms involved in this process in a time bound fashion.
References
Perrone-Filardi P, Dellegrottaglie S, Rudd JH, Costanzo P, Marciano C, Vassallo E, Marsico F, Ruggiero D, Petretta MP, Chiariello M, Cuocolo A. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis in translational medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38(5):969–75.
Glaudemans AW, Slart RH, Bozzao A, Bonanno E, Arca M, Dierckx RA, Signore A. Molecular imaging in atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(12):2381–97.
Chen W, Bural GG, Torigian DA, Rader DJ, Alavi A. Emerging role of FDG-PET/CT in assessing atherosclerosis in large arteries. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36(1):144–51.
Lucignani G. Imaging atherosclerosis in the vulnerable patient. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34(1):143–6.
Hartung D, Schäfers M, Fujimoto S, Levkau B, Narula N, Kopka K, Virmani R, Reutelingsperger C, Hofstra L, Kolodgie FD, Petrov A, Narula J. Targeting of matrix metalloproteinase activation for noninvasive detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34 Suppl 1:S1–8.
Derlin T, Richter U, Bannas P, Begemann P, Buchert R, Mester J, Klutmann S. Feasibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT for imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. J Nucl Med 2010;51(6):862–5.
Derlin T, Wisotzki C, Richter U, Apostolova I, Bannas P, Weber C, Mester J, Klutmann S. In vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: correlation with atherogenic risk factors. J Nucl Med 2011;52(3):362–8.
Li Y, Berenji GR, Shaba WF, Tafti B, Yevdayev E, Dadparvar S. Association of vascular fluoride uptake with vascular calcification and coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun 2012;33(1):14–20.
Beheshti M, Saboury B, Mehta NN, Torigian DA, Werner T, Mohler E, Wilensky R, Newberg AB, Basu S, Langsteger W, Alavi A. Detection and global quantification of cardiovascular molecular calcification by fluoro-18-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography—a novel concept. Hell J Nucl Med 2011;14(2):114–20.
Derlin T, Tóth Z, Papp L, Wisotzki C, Apostolova I, Habermann CR, Mester J, Klutmann S. Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: a dual-tracer PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2011;52(7):1020–7.
Ben-Haim S, Kupzov E, Tamir A, Israel O. Evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake and arterial wall calcifications using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45(11):1816–21.
Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. J Nucl Med 2005;46(8):1278–84.
Ben-Haim S, Kupzov E, Tamir A, Frenkel A, Israel O. Changing patterns of abnormal vascular wall F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on follow-up PET/CT studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13(6):791–800.
Schinke T, McKee MD, Karsenty G. Extracellular matrix calcification: where is the action? Nat Genet 1999;21(2):150–1.
Schinke T, Karsenty G. Vascular calcification—a passive process in need of inhibitors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15(9):1272–4.
Diederichsen AC, Sand NP, Nørgaard B, Lambrechtsen J, Jensen JM, Munkholm H, Aziz A, Gerke O, Egstrup K, Larsen ML, Petersen H, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Mickley H. Discrepancy between coronary artery calcium score and HeartScore in middle-aged Danes: the DanRisk study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011 Apr 27. [Epub ahead of print].
Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30(7):1282–92.
Ylä-Herttuala S, Bentzon JF, Daemen M, Falk E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Herrmann J, Hoefer I, Jukema JW, Krams R, Kwak BR, Marx N, Naruszewicz M, Newby A, Pasterkamp G, Serruys PW, Waltenberger J, Weber C, Tokgözoglu L. Stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques. Position paper of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on atherosclerosis and vascular biology. Thromb Haemost 2011;106(1):1–19.
Falk E, Shah PK. The SHAPE guideline: ahead of its time or just in time? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2011;13(5):345–52.
Tahara N, Imaizumi T, Virmani R, Narula J. Clinical feasibility of molecular imaging of plaque inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Nucl Med 2009;50(3):331–4.
Wykrzykowska J, Lehman S, Williams G, Parker JA, Palmer MR, Varkey S, Kolodny G, Laham R. Imaging of inflamed and vulnerable plaque in coronary arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suppression of myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparation. J Nucl Med 2009;50(4):563–8.
Narula J, Garg P, Achenbach S, Motoyama S, Virmani R, Strauss HW. Arithmetic of vulnerable plaques for noninvasive imaging. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5 Suppl 2:S2–S10.
Saboury B., Ziai P., Alavi A. Detection and quantification of molecular calcification by PET/computed tomography: A new paradigm in assessing atherosclerosis. PET Clinics 2011;6(4): 409-415.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basu, S., Høilund-Carlsen, P.F. & Alavi, A. Assessing global cardiovascular molecular calcification with 18F-fluoride PET/CT: will this become a clinical reality and a challenge to CT calcification scoring?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 660–664 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-2048-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-2048-x