Skip to main content
Log in

Using a simplified version of a common surgical grading scale for acetabular labral tears improves the utility of preoperative hip MRI for femoroacetabular impingement

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate whether a commonly used surgical grading scale, when applied to acetabular labral findings on MRI, could improve preoperative planning and counseling for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Materials and methods

We evaluated 76 clinical MRIs performed on patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Three musculoskeletal radiologists and one musculoskeletal fellow reviewed each scan in a blinded fashion, classifying the acetabular labrum from 12:00 to 4:00 using the Beck scale, a common surgical grading scale. Clinical correlation was provided via surgical examination and classification. Reliability was determined between readers and between reader and surgical data using Cohen’s kappa and Krippendorff’s alpha at each clock position and for the worst grading for each scan. In addition, a simplified version of the scale comprised of only two grades, potentially reparable and not potentially reparable, was evaluated.

Results

When the scale was simplified into categories of potentially reparable and not potentially reparable, the sensitivity was excellent, ranging from 85.5 to 96%. Observer agreement when using individual Beck grades was found to range from poor to fair; Kappa ranged from 0.03 to 0.19, and Alpha ranged from − 0.27 to 0.22.

Conclusion

The simplified version of the Beck labral scale when applied to MRI is a highly sensitive predictor of potentially reparable labral pathology while excluding normal and grossly degenerative tissue. Use of this scale provides clinically relevant information that can drive preoperative planning and improve patient counseling. It does so in a standardized fashion that can be applied across practice sites and without additional cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH 3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(8 Suppl):140–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Domb BG, Hartigan DE, Perets I. Decision making for labral treatment in the hip: repair versus debridement versus reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):e53–62. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rath E, Sharfman ZT, Paret M, Amar E, Drexler M, Bonin N. Hip arthroscopy protocol: expert opinions on post-operative weight bearing and return to sports guidelines. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;4(1):60–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnw045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Oro FBSR, Wolters B, Graver R, Boyd JL, Nelson B, Swiontkowski MF. Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Bolvig L, Gelineck J, Romer L, Soballe K. Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance arthrography in acetabular labral tear diagnostics: a prospective comparison in 20 dysplastic hips. Acta Radiol. 2007;48(9):1004–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850701545839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A, Tschauner C, Engel A, Recht MP, et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology. 1996;200(1):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matcuk GR Jr, Price SE, Patel DB, White EA, Cen S. Acetabular labral tear description and measures of pincer and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and interobserver variability on 3T MR arthrograms. Clin Imaging. 2018;50:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee S, Nardo L, Kumar D, Wyatt CR, Souza RB, Lynch J, et al. Scoring hip osteoarthritis with MRI (SHOMRI): a whole joint osteoarthritis evaluation system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(6):1549–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roemer FW, Hunter DJ, Winterstein A, Li L, Kim YJ, Cibere J, et al. Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System (HOAMS): reliability and associations with radiographic and clinical findings. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19(8):946–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN. The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(3):269–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90057-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy JC, Noble PC, Schuck MR, Wright J, Lee J. The Otto E. Aufranc award: the role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seldes RM, Tan V, Hunt J, Katz M, Winiarsky R, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:232–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200101000-00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87(7):1012–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nepple JJ, Larson CM, Smith MV, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Sierra RJ, et al. The reliability of arthroscopic classification of acetabular rim labrochondral disease. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(10):2224–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512457157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(7):1448–57. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiman MP, Goode AP, Cook CE, Holmich P, Thorborg K. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(12):811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, et al. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):666–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0626-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellermann J, Ziegler C, Nissi MJ, Goebel R, Hughes J, Benson M, et al. Acetabular cartilage assessment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement by using T2* mapping with arthroscopic verification. Radiology. 2014;271(2):512–23. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan P, Nissi MJ, Hughes J, Mortazavi S, Ellermann J. T2* mapping provides information that is statistically comparable to an arthroscopic evaluation of acetabular cartilage. Cartilage. 2018;9(3):237–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603517719316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McClincy MP, Lebrun DG, Tepolt FA, Kim YJ, Yen YM, Kocher MS. Clinical and radiographic predictors of acetabular cartilage lesions in adolescents undergoing hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(13):3082–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518801848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Westermann RW, Lynch TS, Jones MH, Spindler KP, Messner W, Strnad G, et al. Predictors of hip pain and function in femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective cohort analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(9):2325967117726521. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117726521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Minnesota Departments of Radiology and Orthopaedic Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jutta M. Ellermann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional (IRB) and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, P., Crawford, A., Marette, S. et al. Using a simplified version of a common surgical grading scale for acetabular labral tears improves the utility of preoperative hip MRI for femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1987–1994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03495-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03495-9

Keywords

Navigation