Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

First experience with single-source dual-energy computed tomography in six patients with acute arthralgia: a feasibility experiment using joint aspiration as a reference

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an emerging imaging technique for examining patients with suspected gout. Single-source dual-energy CT (S-DECT) is a new way of obtaining DECT information on conventional CT scanners rather than using special dual-source CT systems.

Methods

We tested the feasibility of S-DECT (320-row CT; Aquilion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) in 6 patients (5 men, 1 woman; mean age 61.3, range 48 to 69 years) with acute arthralgia and suspected gout, and compared the S-DECT findings with the results of joint aspiration.

Results

Three patients had a diagnosis of gouty arthritis with negatively birefringent crystals in synovial fluid, in addition to gouty tophi in S-DECT. Three patients had no detectable crystals by polarization microscopy and no tophi on DECT. Their final diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis, activated osteoarthritis, and septic arthritis in one case each.

Conclusion

This initial experience suggests that S-DECT might be a valuable alternative to dual-source CT. Hence, more patients may benefit from its additional diagnostic abilities in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Bongartz T, Glazebrook KN, Kavros SJ, Murthy NS, Merry SP, Franz WB, et al. Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1072–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalbeth N, Aati O, Kalluru R, Gamble GD, Horne A, Doyle AJ, et al. Relationship between structural joint damage and urate deposition in gout: a plain radiography and dual-energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1030–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K, Koenig N, Reid G, Abufayyah M, et al. Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1466–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S-K, Lee H, Kim JH, Park S-H, Lee SK, Choe J-Y. Potential interest of dual-energy computed tomography in gout: focus on anatomical distribution and clinical association. Rheumatology. 2013;52:402–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morsbach F, Wurnig MC, Müller D, Krauss B, Korporaal JG, Alkadhi H. Feasibility of single-source dual-energy computed tomography for urinary stone characterization and value of iterative reconstructions. Investig Radiol. 2013;49:125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright JD, Pinto AB. Clinical manifestations and treatment of gout. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 2003;10:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, Pascual E, Barskova V, Conaghan P, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. II. Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1312–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathieu S, Pereira B, Couderc M, Soubrier M. Usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout: a meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:e23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pascual E, Doherty M. Aspiration of normal or asymptomatic pathological joints for diagnosis and research: indications, technique and success rate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:3–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huppertz A, Hermann K-GA, Diekhoff T, Wagner M, Hamm B, Schmidt WA. Systemic staging for urate crystal deposits with dual-energy CT and ultrasound in patients with suspected gout. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(6):763–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalbeth N, Schauer C, MacDonald P, Perez-Ruiz F, Schumacher HR, Hamburger S, et al. Methods of tophus assessment in clinical trials of chronic gout: a systematic literature review and pictorial reference guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melzer R, Pauli C, Treumann T, Krauss B, editors. Gout tophus detection—a comparison of dual-energy CT (DECT) and histology. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43(5):662–5.

  13. Gruber M, Bodner G, Rath E, Supp G, Weber M, Schueller-Weidekamm C. Dual-energy computed tomography compared with ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout. Rheumatology. 2014;53(1):173–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saltybaeva N, Jafari ME, Hupfer M, Kalender WA. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities. Radiology. 2014;273(1):153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu HJ, Liao MY, Xu LY. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for gout diagnosis. Clin Imaging. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.015.

  16. Dalbeth N, Stamp L. Hyperuricaemia and gout: time for a new staging system? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(9):1598–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sivera F, Andres M, Falzon L, van der Heijde DM, Carmona L. Diagnostic value of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings in patients with a clinical suspicion of gout: a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2014;92:3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grainger R, Dalbeth N, Keen H, Durcan L, Edwards NL, Perez-Ruiz F, et al. Imaging as an outcome measure in gout studies: report from the OMERACT gout working group. J Rheumatol. 2015. doi:10.3899/jrheum.141164.

  19. Dalbeth N, House ME, Aati O, Tan P, Franklin C, Horne A, et al. Urate crystal deposition in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia and symptomatic gout: a dual energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(5):908–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bongartz T, Glazebrook KN, Kavros SJ, Murthy NS, Merry SP, Franz WB, et al. Dual-energy CT for the diagnosis of gout: an accuracy and diagnostic yield study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1072–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schellingerhout D, Lev MH, Bagga RJ, Rincon S, Berdichevsky D, Thangaraj V, et al. Coregistration of head CT comparison studies: assessment of clinical utility. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(3):242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, el Ibrahim SH, Morin RL, Haley WE, Thiel DD. In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McQueen FMF, Doyle AJ, Reeves Q, Gamble GD, Dalbeth N. DECT urate deposits: now you see them, now you don’t. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(3):458–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by Toshiba Medical Systems. JM is an employee of Toshiba Medical Systems Europe and took part in the study design and the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Torsten Diekhoff, Tobias Kiefer, Bernd Hamm & Kay-Geert A Hermann

  2. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Mitte, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Katharina Ziegeler & Eugen Feist

  3. Toshiba Medical Systems Europe, BV, Zilverstraat 1, 2701 RP, Zoetermeer, Netherlands

    Jürgen Mews

Authors
  1. Torsten Diekhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Ziegeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugen Feist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tobias Kiefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jürgen Mews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bernd Hamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kay-Geert A Hermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Diekhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diekhoff, T., Ziegeler, K., Feist, E. et al. First experience with single-source dual-energy computed tomography in six patients with acute arthralgia: a feasibility experiment using joint aspiration as a reference. Skeletal Radiol 44, 1573–1577 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2204-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2204-7

Keywords