Abstract
Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 cultures that were cellobiose-limited converted cellobiose to succinate and acetate, produced little glucose or cellotriose, maintained an intracellular ATP concentration of 4.1 mM and a membrane potential of 140 mV for 24 h, did not lyse at a rapid rate once they had reached stationary phase, and had a most probable number of viable cells that was greater than 106/ml. When the cellobiose concentration was increased 6-fold (5 mM to 30 mM), ammonia was depleted and the cultures left 10 mM cellobiose. Cultures provided with excess cellobiose produced succinate and acetate while they were growing, but there was little increase in fermentation acids after the ammonia was depleted and growth ceased. The stationary-phase, cellobiose-excess cultures had a lysis rate that was 7-fold faster than that of the cellobiose-limited cultures, and the most probable number was only 3.3 × 103 cells/ml. The stationary-phase, cellobiose-excess cultures had 2.5 times as much cellular polysaccharide as the cellobiose-limited cultures, but the intracellular ATP and membrane potential were very low (0.1 mM and 40 mV respectively). Methylglyoxal, a potentially toxic end-product of carbohydrate fermentation, could not be detected, and fresh inocula grew rapidly in spent medium that was supplemented with additional ammonia. Stationary-phase, cellobiose-excess cultures converted cellobiose to glucose and cellotriose, but the apparent K m of cellotriose formation was 15-fold lower than the K m of glucose production (0.7 mM compared to 10 mM).
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 26 June 1997 / Received revision: 12 August 1997 / Accepted: 29 August 1997
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maglione, G., Russell, J. The adverse effect of nitrogen limitation and excess-cellobiose on Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48, 720–725 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051122
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051122