Skip to main content
Log in

Humic materials offer photoprotective effect toEscherichia coli exposed to damaging luminous radiation

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior ofEscherichia coli immersed in aqueous systems amended with humic acids, under PAR, UV-A, UV-B, and simulated solar radiation was examined. Culturability, ability to elongate, functioning of the electron transport systems, and glucose uptake were assessed. Humic substances in the range from 1 to 50 mg L−1 protected cells from photoinactivation. Decrease in culturability and cellular activities was significantly (p<0.05) less in the presence of humic material. However, humic acid were not used as nutrients. Neither irradiated nor nonirradiated humic solutions (50 mg L−1) supported the growth of 105 cells ml−1. However, humic acids dissolved in 0.9% NaCl efficiently absorbed light over wavelengths from 270 to 500 nm. Also, a photoprotective effect against simulated sunlight was observed when humic acid were not in contact with but rather enveloped the cellular suspensions in double-wall microcosms. The protection afforded by humic acids against luminous radiation likely derives from their ability to absorb these radiations and hence reduces the amount of energy reaching the cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allard B, Borén H, Pettersson C, Zhang G (1994) Degradation of humic substances by UV irradiation. Environ Intern 20:97–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkan U, Elliott DJ, Evison LM (1995) Survival of enteric bacteria in relation to simulated solar radiation and other environmental factors in marine waters. Wat Res 29:2071–2081.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arana I, Justo JI, Muela A, Pocino M, Iriberri J, Barcina I (1997) Influence of a survival process in a freshwater system upon plasmid transfer betweenEscherichia coli strains. Microb Ecol 33:41–49 DOI: 10.1007/s002489900006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barcina I, Arana I, Santorum P, Iriberri J, Egea L (1995) Direct viable count of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using ciprofloxacin as inhibitor of cellular division. J Microbiol Meth 22:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barcina I, González JM, Iriberri J, Egea L (1990) Survival strategy ofEscherichia coli andEnterococcus faecalis in illuminated fresh and marine systems. J Appl Bacteriol 68:189–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barcina I, Lebaron P, Vives-Rego J (1997) Survival of allochthonous bacteria in aquatic systems: a biological approach. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 23:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Björn LO, Teramura AH (1993) Simulation of daylight radiation and effects of ozone depletion. In: Young AR, Björn LO, Moan J, Nultsch W (eds) Environmental UV Photobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 41–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colwell RR, Brayton PR, Grimes DJ, Roszak DB, Huq SA, Palmer LM (1985) Viable but non-culturableVibrio cholerae and related pathogens in the environment: implications for release of genetically engineered microorganisms. Bio/Technology 3:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corin N, Backlund P, Wiklund T (1998) Bacterial growth in humic waters exposed to UV-radiation and simulated sunlight. Chemosphere 36:1947–1958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Curtis TP, Mara DD, Silva SA (1992) Influence of pH, oxygen, and humic substances on ability of sunlight to damage fecal coliforms in waste stabilization pond water. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1335–1343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies CM, Evison LM (1991) Sunlight and the survival of enteric bacteria in natural waters. J Appl Bacteriol 70:265–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies-Colley RJ, Bell RG, Donnison AM (1994) Sunlight inactivation of enterococci and fecal coliforms in sewage effluent diluted in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:2049–2058

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Frimmel FH (1994) Photochemical aspects related to humic substances. Environ Intern 20:373–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujioka RS, Hashimoto HH, Siwak EB, Reginald HF (1981) Effect of sunlight on survival of indicator bacteria in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:690–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gourmelon M, Cillard J, Pommepuy M (1994) Visible light damage onEscherichia coli in seawater: oxidative stress hypothesis. J Appl Bacteriol 77:105–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grigsby P, Calkins J (1980) The inactivation of a natural population of coliform bacteria by sunlight. Photochem Photobiol 31:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hedges JI (1992) Global biogeochemical cycles: Progress and problems. Mar Chem 39:67–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Herndl G, Brugger A, Hager S, Kaiser E, Obernisterer I, Reitner B, Slezak D (1997) Role of ultraviolet-B radiation on bacterioplankton and the availability of dissolved organic matter. Plant Ecol 128:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jians X, Chai T (1996) Survival ofVibrio parahaemolyticus at low temperatures under starvation conditions and subsequent resuscitation of viable nonculturable cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1300–1305

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser E, Herndl GJ (1997) Rapid recovery of marine bacterioplankton activity after inhibition by UV radiation in coastal waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4026–4031

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karentz D, Bothwell ML, Coffin RB, Hanson A, Herndl GJ, Kilham SS, Lesser MP, Lindell M, Moeller RE, Morris DP, Neale PJ, Sanders RW, Weiler CS, Wetzel RG (1994) Impact of UV-radiation on pelagic freshwater ecosystems: report of working group on bacteria and phytoplankton. Arch Hydrobiol Beih 43:31–69

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kieber DJ, Mopper K (1987) Photochemical formation of glycoxylic and pyruvic acids in sea water. Mar Chem 21:135–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kieber DJ, Zhou X, Mopper K (1990) Formation of carbonyl compounds from UV-induced photodegradation of humic substances in natural waters: fate of riverine carbon in the sea. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1503–1515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kjelleberg S (1992) Starvation in Bacteria. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindell MJ, Granelli HW, Tranvik LJ (1995) Enhanced bacterial growth in response to photochemical transformation of dissolved organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr 40:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindell MJ, Granelli HW, Tranvik LJ (1996) Effects of sunlight on bacterial growth in lakes of different humic content. Aquat Microb Ecol 11:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lleó MM, Tafi MC, Canepari P (1998) NonculturableEnterococcus faecalis cells are metabolically active and capable of resuming active growth. System Appl Microbiol 21:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  29. Monfort P, Baleux B (1994) Effects of environmental factors present in St. Lawrence Estuary (Quebec, Canada) on experimental survival ofSalmonella salamae as determined by flow cytometry. Can J Microbiol 9:712–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mopper K, Stahovec WL (1986) Sources and sinks of low molecular weight organic carbonyl compounds in seawater. Mar Chem 19:305–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Muela A, Pocino M, Arana I, Justo JI, Iriberri J, Barcina I (1994) Effect of growth phase and parental cell survival in river water on plasmid transfer betweenEscherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4273–4278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Muela A, García-Bringas JM, Arana I, Barcina I (1999) The effect of simulated solar radiation onEscherichia coli. The relative role of UV-B, UV-A, and photosynthetically active radiation. Microb Ecol 39:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nybroe O (1995) Assessment of metabolic activity of single bacterial cells— new developments in microcolony and dehydrogenase assays. FEMS Microb Ecol 17:77–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Palenik B, Price NM, Morel FMM (1991) Potential effects of UV-B on the chemical environment of marine organisms: A review. Environ Pollut 70:117–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Peak MJ, Peak JG (1989) Solar-ultraviolet-induced damage to DNA. J Photodermatol 6:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reitner B, Herndl GJ, Herzig A (1997) Role of ultraviolet-B radiation of photochemical and microbial oxygen consumption in a humic-rich shallow lake. Limnol Oceanogr 42:950–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodríguez GG, Phipps D, Ishiguro K, Ridgway HF (1992) Use of fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1801–1808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scully NM, Lean DRS (1994) The attenuation of ultraviolet radiation in temperate lakes. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 43:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  39. Solic M, Krstulovic N (1992) Separate and combined effects of solar radiation, temperature, salinity, and pH on the survival of faecal coliforms in seawater. Mar Pollut Bull 24:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thurman EM (1985) Organic Geochemistry of Natural Watters. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tranvik LJ (1998) Degradation of dissolved organic matter in humic waters by bacteria. Ecol Studies 133:259–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitelam GC, Codd GA (1986) Damaging effects of light on microorganisms. Spec Publ Soc Gen Microbiol 17:129–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Whitesides MD, Oliver JD (1997) Resuscitation ofVibrio vulnificus from the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1002–1005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wright RT, Burnison BK (1969) Heterotrophic activity measured with radiolabelled organic substrates. In: Costerton JW, Colwell RR (eds) Native Aquatic Bacteria: Enumeration, Activity and Ecology. American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 140–155

  45. Wright RT, Hobbie JE (1965) The uptake of organic solutes by planktonic bacteria and algae. Ocean Sci Eng 1:116–127

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wright RT, Hobbie JE (1966) The use of glucose and acetate by bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystem. Ecology 47:447–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Barcina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muela, A., García-Bringas, J.M., Arana, I. et al. Humic materials offer photoprotective effect toEscherichia coli exposed to damaging luminous radiation. Microb Ecol 40, 336–344 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000064

Keywords

Navigation