Skip to main content
Log in

Eccentric Enlargement of the Aortic Sinuses in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Cardiac MRI Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic root size and cusp fusion pattern have been related to disease outcomes in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study seeks to characterize symmetry of the aortic sinuses in adult and pediatric BAV patients and its relationship to valvulopathy and root aortopathy. Aortic sinus-to-commissure (S-C) lengths were measured on cardiac MRI of adult and pediatric BAV patients with right-and-left coronary (RL) or right-and-non-coronary (RN) leaflet fusion and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) controls. Coefficient of variance (CoV) of S-C lengths was calculated to quantify sinus asymmetry, or eccentricity. BAV cohort included 149 adults (48 ± 15 years) and 51 children (15 ± 5 years). TAV cohort included 40 adults (60 ± 13 years) and 20 children (15 ± 5 years). In adult and pediatric BAV patients, the non-fused aortic sinus was larger than either fused sinus. In RL fusion, the non-coronary S-C distance was larger than right or left S-C distances in adults (n = 121, p < 0.001) and larger than the right S-C distance in children (n = 41, p = 0.013). Sinus eccentricity (CoV) in BAV patients was higher than in TAV patients (p < 0.001) and did not correlate with age (p = 0.12). CoV trended higher in RL adults with aortic regurgitation (AR) compared to those without AR (p = 0.081), but was lower in RN adults with AR than without AR (p = 0.006). CoV did not correlate to root Z scores (p = 0.06–0.55) or ascending aortic (AAo) Z scores in adults (p = 0.45–0.55) but correlated negatively to AAo Z score in children (p = 0.005–0.03). Most adult and pediatric BAV patients with RL and RN leaflet fusion demonstrate eccentric dominance of the non-fused aortic sinus irrespective of age. The degree of eccentricity varies with valve dysfunction and BAV phenotype but does not relate to the degree of aortic root dilatation, nor does eccentricity correlate with ascending aorta dilatation in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basso C, Boschello M, Perrone C et al (2004) An echocardiographic survey of primary school children for bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 93:661–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts WC (1970) The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 26:72–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D et al (2011) Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 306:1104–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang JW, Song HG, Yang DH et al (2013) Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong WK, Delgado V, Poh KK et al (2017) Prognostic implications of raphe in bicuspid aortic valve anatomy. JAMA Cardiol 2:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J et al (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S et al (2014) Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 129:673–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Capoulade R, Teoh JG, Bartko PE et al (2018) Relationship between proximal aorta morphology and progression rate of aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:561–569.e561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Prakash SK et al (2015) Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy in adults: incidence, etiology, and clinical significance. Int J Cardiol 201:400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Detaint D, Michelena HI, Nkomo VT et al (2014) Aortic dilatation patterns and rates in adults with bicuspid aortic valves: a comparative study with Marfan syndrome and degenerative aortopathy. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 100:126–134

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torres FS, Windram JD, Bradley TJ et al (2013) Impact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1769–1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vis JC, Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Teixido-Tura G et al (2019) Implications of asymmetry and valvular morphotype on echocardiographic measurements of the aortic root in bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chubb H, Simpson JM (2012) The use of Z-scores in paediatric cardiology. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 5:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campens L, Demulier L, De Groote K et al (2014) Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories. Am J Cardiol 114:914–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michelena HI, Prakash SK, Della Corte A et al (2014) Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). Circulation 129:2691–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Entezari P, Schnell S, Mahadevia R et al (2014) From unicuspid to quadricuspid: influence of aortic valve morphology on aortic three-dimensional hemodynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:1342–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vis JC, Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Teixido-Tura G et al (2018) Implications of asymmetry and valvular morphotype on echocardiographic measurements of the aortic root in bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandez B, Duran AC, Fernandez-Gallego T et al (2009) Bicuspid aortic valves with different spatial orientations of the leaflets are distinct etiological entities. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2312–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips HM, Mahendran P, Singh E et al (2013) Neural crest cells are required for correct positioning of the developing outflow cushions and pattern the arterial valve leaflets. Cardiovasc Res 99:452–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beroukhim RS, Kruzick TL, Taylor AL et al (2006) Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 98:828–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spaziani G, Ballo P, Favilli S et al (2014) Clinical outcome, valve dysfunction, and progressive aortic dilation in a pediatric population with isolated bicuspid aortic valve. Pediatr Cardiol 35:803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merkx R, Duijnhouwer AL, Vink E et al (2017) Aortic diameter growth in children with a bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 120:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK et al (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A et al (2018) Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aicher D, Kunihara T, Abou Issa O et al (2011) Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 123:178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ugur M, Schaff HV, Suri RM et al (2014) Late outcome of noncoronary sinus replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and aortopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1242–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather A. Stefek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stefek, H.A., Lin, K.H., Rigsby, C.K. et al. Eccentric Enlargement of the Aortic Sinuses in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Cardiac MRI Study. Pediatr Cardiol 41, 350–360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02264-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02264-3

Keywords

Navigation