Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Quality Bundle to Support High-Risk Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation outcomes are increasingly promising for children with dilated cardiomyopathy and advanced decompensated heart failure (ADHF). VAD placement in patients with clinical features such as complex congenital cardiac anatomy, small body size, or major comorbidities remains problematic. These comorbidities have been traditionally prohibitive for VAD consideration leaving these children as a treatment-orphaned population. Here we describe the quality bundle surrounding these patients with ADHF considered high risk for VAD implantation at our institution. Over a 7-year period, a quality bundle aimed at the peri-operative care for children with high-risk features undergoing VAD implantation was incrementally implemented at a tertiary children’s hospital. Patients were considered high risk if they were neonates (< 30 days), had single-ventricle physiology, non-dilated cardiomyopathy, biventricular dysfunction, or significant comorbidities. The quality improvement bundle evolved to include (1) structured team-based peri-operative evaluation, (2) weekly VAD rounds addressing post-operative device performance, (3) standardized anticoagulation strategies, and (4) a multidisciplinary system for management challenges. These measures aimed to improve communication, standardize management, allow for ongoing process improvement, and incorporate principles of a high-reliability organization. Between January 2010 and December 2017, 98 patients underwent VAD implantation, 48 (49%) of which had high-risk comorbidities and a resultant cohort survival-to-transplant rate of 65%. We report on the evolution of a quality improvement program to expand the scope of VAD implantation to patients with high-risk clinical profiles. This quality bundle can serve as a template for future large-scale collaborations to improve outcomes in these treatment-orphaned subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fraser CD Jr, Jaquiss RD (2013) The Berlin heart EXCOR pediatric ventricular assist device: history, North American experience, and future directions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1291:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blume ED, VanderPluym C, Lorts A et al (2018) Second annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (Pedimacs) report: pre-implant characteristics and outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 37(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dipchand AI, Kirk R, Naftel DC et al (2018) Ventricular assist device support as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(4):402–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burki S, Adachi I (2017) Pediatric ventricular assist devices: current challenges and future prospects. Vasc Health Risk Manag 13:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zafar F, Castleberry C, Khan MS et al (2015) Pediatric heart transplant waiting list mortality in the era of ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(1):82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almond CS, Morales DL, Blackstone EH et al (2013) Berlin heart EXCOR pediatric ventricular assist device for bridge to heart transplantation in US children. Circulation 127(16):1702–1711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maeda K, Rosenthal DN, Reinhartz O (2018) Ventricular assist devices for neonates and infants. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 21:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein S, Bello R, Pizarro C, et al (2014) The use of the Berlin heart EXCOR in patients with functional single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(2):697–704 (discussion 704–695).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser CD Jr, Jaquiss RD, Rosenthal DN et al (2012) Prospective trial of a pediatric ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 367(6):532–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magnetta DA, Kang J, Wearden PD, Smith KJ, Feingold B (2018) Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device destination therapy for advanced heart failure in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatr Cardiol 39:1242–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seguchi O, Kuroda K, Fujita T, Fukushima N, Nakatani T (2016) Advanced heart failure secondary to muscular dystrophy: clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 35(6):831–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunes AJ, Buchholz H, Sinnadurai S, MacArthur RG (2012) Long-term mechanical circulatory support of an adult patient with down syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 93(4):1305–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeewa A, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell G, Humpl T, Dipchand AI (2010) Outcomes with ventricular assist device versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to pediatric heart transplantation. Artif Organs 34(12):1087–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ford MA, Gauvreau K, McMullan DM et al (2016) Factors associated with mortality in neonates requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac indications: analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry data. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17(9):860–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Misfeldt AM, Kirsch RE, Goldberg DJ et al (2016) Outcomes of single-ventricle patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17(3):194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dipchand AI, Mahle WT, Tresler M et al (2015) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to pediatric heart transplantation: effect on post-listing and post-transplantation outcomes. Circ Heart Fail 8(5):960–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alert SE (2017) Inadequate hand-off communication. Sentinel Event Alert 58:1–6.

  18. Alvarez G, Coiera E (2006) Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care 21(3):236–242 (discussion 242)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, Portland

  20. Hirano H, Furuya M (2006) JIT is flow: practice and principles of lean manufacturing. PCS Press, Inc, Portland

  21. Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E (2005) Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care 14(4):303–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ke W, Km S (2007) Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  23. Massicotte MP, Bauman ME, Murray J, Almond CS (2015) Antithrombotic therapy for ventricular assist devices in children: do we really know what to do? J Thromb Haemost 13(Suppl 1):S343–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Adachi I, Kostousov V, Hensch L, Chacon-Portillo MA, Teruya J (2018) Management of hemostasis for pediatric patients on ventricular-assist devices. Semin Thromb Hemost 44(1):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Funding

No specific funding support was used for this quality report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Christopher Knoll, Sharon Chen, Jenna M. Murray, John C. Dykes, Vamsi V. Yarlagadda, David N. Rosenthal, Christopher S. Almond & Andrew Y. Shin

  2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Katsuhide Maeda

Authors
  1. Christopher Knoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jenna M. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John C. Dykes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vamsi V. Yarlagadda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David N. Rosenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christopher S. Almond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Katsuhide Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andrew Y. Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Knoll.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knoll, C., Chen, S., Murray, J.M. et al. A Quality Bundle to Support High-Risk Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 1159–1164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02123-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation