Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the primary treatment of encrusted ureteral stents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Double pigtail (JJ) ureteral stents, are the most commonly used method of urinary diversion in the ureteral obstructions. Encrustations may occur as a result of prolonged exposure due to forgetting these stents in the body. Removing these materials might be an annoyance. Forty-four patients from three tertiary referral centres with forgotten JJ stents left in them between the years 2007 and 2014 were included in the study. Stents could not be removed by attempted cystoscopy. As an alternative approach, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was the first choice since it is minimally invasive. The results of that treatment are presented along with the relevant demographic data. JJ stenting for urolithiasis was performed in 36 patients, after open surgery in five patients, and for oncological reasons in three patients. ESWL was applied to stents or to any suspicious region adjacent to the stent. In 29 of 44 patients, the stents were easily removed under cystoscopic procedures while in one patient the fragmented residual stent was spontaneously excreted. In eight patients, ureteroscopy was required; in five patients, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was required; and in one patient, open surgery was required in order to remove stents. ESWL can be considered as a first-line treatment when a forgotten JJ stent is detected despite all precautions after any kind of urological intervention involving insertion of ureteral stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auge BK, Preminger GM (2002) Ureteral stents and their use in endourology. Curr Opin Urol 12:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sansalone CV, Maione G, Aseni P, Mangoni I, Soldano S, Minetti E, Radaelli L, Civati G (2005) Advantages of short-time ureteric stenting for prevention of urological complications in kidney transplantation: an 18-year experience. Transplant Proc 37:2511–2515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murthy KVR, Reddy SJ, Prasad DV (2010) Endourological management of forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. Int Braz J Urol 36:420–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Witjes JA (1993) Breakage of a silicone double pigtail ureteral stent as a long-term complication. J Urol 150:1898–1899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh I, Gupta N, Hemal AK, Aron M, Seth A, Dogra PN (2001) Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology 58:526–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Polat F, Yesil S, Kirac M, Tan MO, Biri H, Bozkirli I (2005) An uncommon application of shock wave lithotripsy: encrusted double pigtail ureteral stent. Int Urol Nephrol 37:231–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulze KA, Wettlaufer JN, Oldani G (1985) Encrustation and stone formation: complication of indwelling ureteral stents. Urology 25:616–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. El Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, Husain I (1995) Poly- urethane internal urethral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 153:1817–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prodromos GB, Christopher JK (2000) Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden. J Urol 164:648–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robert M, Boularan AM, El Sandid M, Grasset D (1997) Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol Int 58:100–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finney RP (1982) Double-J and diversion stents. Urol Clin North Am 9:89–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bostanci Y, Ozden E, Atac F, Yakupoglu YK, Yilmaz AF, Sarikaya S (2012) Single session removal of forgotten encrusted ureteral stents: combined endourological approach. Urol Res 40:611–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bultitude MF, Tiptaft RC, Glass JM, Dasgupta P (2003) Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract. Urology 62:622–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ather MH, Talati J, Biyabani R (2000) Physician responsibility for removal of implants: the case for a computerized program for tracking overdue double-J stents. Tech Urol 6:189–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sancaktutar AA, Tepeler A, Söylemez H, Penbegül N, Atar M, Bozkurt Y, Yıldırım K (2012) A solution for medical and legal problems arising from forgotten ureteral stents: initial results from a reminder short message service (SMS). Urol Res 40:253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokman Irkilata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irkilata, L., Ozgur, B.C., Sancaktutar, A.A. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the primary treatment of encrusted ureteral stents. Urolithiasis 43, 379–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0782-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0782-4

Keywords