Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arterialised venous loops and complex flap reconstruction: can silicone and Doppler monitoring make them safer?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arteriovenous loops (AVL) of Corlett are used to provide recipient vessels for complex microsurgical reconstructions in vessel depleted lower limbs. They can be prone to thrombosis, injury during re-dissection, and possible steal phenomenon. We report an approach to improve safety and decrease dissection time in a delayed complex lower limb reconstruction. A 49-year-old male was referred for non-union of a severely comminuted and compound femoral fracture. A vascularised double-barrel fibula flap was planned with a two-team approach. Despite negative bone scans and pre-operative blood tests, infected femoral callus was found intraoperatively. The raised flap was wrapped in silicone sheets to ease re-dissection. At the second reconstructive attempt, after antibiotic therapy, the silicone-wrapped recipient vein was found thrombosed. A delayed reconstruction with an AVL was executed. The contralateral long saphenous vein was harvested and anastomosed end-to-side to the superficial femoral artery and end-to-end to the ipsilateral great saphenous vein close to the saphenofemoral junction. The loop was wrapped in silicone to prevent over-dilatation of the vein and to prevent adherence to tissues for subsequent dissection. The loop was matured for 4 weeks during which Doppler ultrasonography revealed an arterial stenosis requiring balloon angioplasty. Division of the loop and final free fibula flap transfer occurred with no postoperative complications. The use of silicone sheeting has not been previously described to protect the recipient vessels, to facilitate re-operation, and to restrict AVL dilatation secondary to arterial forces. Doppler ultrasonography has also not been described to monitor loop safety. Combined AVL with silicone sheeting and Doppler monitoring improved the speed and safety in this two-stage AVL procedure.

Level of evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knackstedt R et al (2018) Single-stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop microsurgical reconstruction: a meta-analysis of the literature. Microsurgery 38(6):706–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Threlfall GN, Little JM, Cummine J (1982) Free flap transfer–preliminary establishment of an arteriovenous fistula: a case report. ANZ J Surg 52(2):182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavadas C (2008) Arteriovenous vascular loops in free flap reconstruction of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(2):514–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwei S et al (2004) Early adaptive responses of the vascular wall during venous arterialization in mice. Am J Pathol 164(1):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charles AK, Gresham GA (1993) Histopathological changes in venous grafts and in varicose and non-varicose veins. J Clin Pathol 46(7):603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ (1994) The emerging concept of vascular remodeling. NEJM 330(20):1431–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan BD, Langille BBL (1996) Cellular and molecular biology of vascular remodeling. Curr Opin Lipidol 7(2):94–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz LB et al (1992) Myointimal thickening in experimental vein grafts is dependent on wall tension. J Vasc Surg 15(1):176–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bush HL et al (1986) The natural history of endothelial structure and function in arterialized vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 3(2):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin C-H et al (2004) Sixty-five clinical cases of free tissue transfer using long arteriovenous fistulas or vein grafts. J Trauma 56(5):1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Henn TD et al (2018) One stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions – an experience on 103 cases from a single center. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):912–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer A et al (2015) Results of combined vascular reconstruction by means of AV loops and free flap transfer in patients with soft tissue defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(4):545–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pribaz JJ, Fine NA (1994) Prelamination: defining the prefabricated flap—a case report and review. Microsurgery 15(9):618–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yap KK et al (2018) The vascularised chamber as an in vivo bioreactor. Trends Biotechnol 36(10):1011–1024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maitz MF (2015) Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine. Biosurface and Biotribology 1(3):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris JR et al (1999) Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model. J Otrolaryngol 28(3):152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamane Y et al (2017) Impact of the size mismatch between saphenous vein graft and coronary artery on graft patency. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Yousef.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This is a case report. For this kind of study, no ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

Patient signed informed consent regarding publication of their case and photographs.

Conflict of interest

Justin Yousef, Michael W Findlay, and Rostam D Farhadieh declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousef, J., Findlay, M. & Farhadieh, R.D. Arterialised venous loops and complex flap reconstruction: can silicone and Doppler monitoring make them safer?. Eur J Plast Surg 45, 855–859 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01927-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01927-w

Keywords

Navigation