Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-uraemic calciphylaxis: a diagnostic and management challenge for the burns team

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calciphylaxis is a rare systemic condition usually seen in patients with end-stage renal disease. It is characterised by pathological calcification of dermal blood vessels, causing ischaemia and necrosis in the skin and subcutaneous fat. The lesions are usually small but, in extreme cases, may be very extensive and may mimic necrotising fasciitis, prompting extensive surgical debridement. We describe the challenges faced in managing such a case. A 38-year-old female patient was admitted to another hospital with widespread progressive truncal skin necrosis. A provisional diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis was made, and she underwent debridement of 32% of her total body surface area (TBSA). However, her condition rapidly deteriorated and she was transferred to our burn centre for further management. Diagnosis of calciphylaxis was based on clinical features and confirmed by tissue biopsy. Characteristic findings of progressive skin and fat necrosis at the wound margins with healthy underlying fascia and muscle were recognised from previously treated cases of calciphylaxis; however, the absence of renal disease proved misleading. Non-uraemic calciphylaxis is very rare but can, as in this case, be associated with alcoholic liver disease. At our centre, the patient required prolonged ventilation and supportive treatment in burns critical care, combined with intensive wound management, repeated episodes of debridement, temporary wound cover using human skin allografts and reconstruction using split-thickness autograft. We report this case to alert others to this rare condition as a possible diagnosis in patients presenting with extensive panniculitis. We discuss associations, diagnostic difficulties, novel therapies and the importance of multidisciplinary care in managing these complex cases.

Level of evidence: Level V, diagnostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wichienkuer P, Naugler W, Wusirika R (2011) Calciphylaxis in a patient with acute kidney injury and alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Nephrol 76(6):499–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weenig RH, Sewell LD, Davis MD, McCarthy JT, Pittelkow MR (2007) Calciphylaxis: natural history, risk factor analysis, and outcome. J Am Acad Dermatol 56(4):569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers NM, Coates PTH (2008) Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy: an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 17(6):629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nigwekar S, Kroshinsky D, Nazarian R, Goverman J, Malhotra R, Jackson V, Thadhani R (2015) Calciphylaxis: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 66(1):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nigwekar S, Wolf M, Sterns R, Hix J (2008) Calciphylaxis from nonuremic causes: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3(4):1139–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed S, Hood AF, Evan AP, Moe SM (2001) Calciphylaxis is associated with hyperphosphatemia and increased osteopontin expression by vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Kidney Dis 37(6):1267–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleyer AJ, Choi M, Igwemezie B, de la Torre E, White WL (1998) A case control study of proximal calciphylaxis. Am J Kidney Dis 32(3):376–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fine A, Zacharias J (2002) Calciphylaxis is usually non-ulcerating: risk factors, outcome and therapy. Kidney Int 61(6):2210–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vedvyas C, Winterfield LS, Vleugels RA (2012) Calciphylaxis: a systematic review of existing and emerging therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(6):e253–e260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selye H, Gentile G, Prioreschi P (1961) Cutaneous molt induced by calciphylaxis in the rat. Science 134(3493):1876–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson D, Stewart W, Piercy D (1968) Calcifying panniculitis with fat and skin necrosis in a case of uraemia with autonomous hyperparathyroidism. Lancet 292(7563):323–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Angelis M, Wong LL, Myers SA, Wong LM (1997) Calciphylaxis in patients on hemodialysis: a prevalence study. Surgery 122(6):1083–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng AT, Peng DH (2011) Calciphylaxis. Dermatol Ther 24(2):256–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mochel MC, Arakaki RY, Wang G, Kroshinsky D, Hoang MP (2013) Cutaneous calciphylaxis: a retrospective histopathologic evaluation. Am J Dermatopathol 35(5):582–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Auriemma M, Carbone A, Di Liberato L, Cupaiolo A, Caponio C, De Simone C et al (2011) Treatment of cutaneous calciphylaxis with sodium thiosulfate. Am J Clin Dematol 12(5):339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ning MS, Dahir KM, Castellanos EH, McGirt LY (2013) Sodium thiosulfate in the treatment of non-uremic calciphylaxis. J Dermatol 40(8):649–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nigwekar SU, Brunelli SM, Meade D, Wang W, Hymes J, Lacson E (2013) Sodium thiosulfate therapy for calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8(7):1162–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. MHRA drug information for sodium thiosulphate. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/spcpil/documents/spcpil/con1489732048176.pdf

  19. Wollina U, Helm C, Hansel G, Koch A, Schönlebe J, Haroske G, Köstler E (2008) Deep ulcer shaving combined with split-skin transplantation in distal calciphylaxis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 7(2):102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the patient for consenting to the publication of this case report and photographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Cubitt.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The authors have not received any funding for this case report.

Conflict of interest

Jonathan Cubitt, Anthony Short, Linsday Shanks, Allan Dawson, Claire Ware, Peter Drew, and David Williams declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This case did not require ethical approval.

Informed consent

The patient has consented to publication of this case report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cubitt, J., Short, A., Shanks, L. et al. Non-uraemic calciphylaxis: a diagnostic and management challenge for the burns team. Eur J Plast Surg 41, 359–364 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1358-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1358-z

Keywords

Navigation