Skip to main content
Log in

Early clinical experience of using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Here, we presented our early experience with flow diversion procedures using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter (SE, Stryker) and reported the feasibility and safety profile compared to those of a control group treated with other types of flow diverters.

Methods

We included 31 and 53 consecutive flow diversion procedures performed using the SE and other commercial flow diverters, respectively, to treat intracranial aneurysms at our institution. We used two commercial flow diversion systems in the comparison group: the pipeline embolization device and Surpass Streamline.

Results

In the SE group, technical failures occurred in three (9.7%) cases, due to either incomplete wall apposition (n = 1, 3.2%) or stent migration (n = 2, 6.5%). Major complications occurred in four (12.9%) cases: delayed rupture of the target aneurysm (n = 1, 3.2%), major ischemic stroke (n = 1, 3.2%), sudden death from an unidentified cause (n = 1, 3.2%), and parent artery occlusion with stent thrombosis (n = 1, 3.2%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in eight (25.8%) cases. On post-procedure MRI, a DWI-positive lesion was detected in three (9.7%) cases. After multivariate adjustment, the SE group was independently associated with less procedural time of ≥ 90 min (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03–0.29; p < 0.001), balloon angioplasty (adjusted OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07–0.75; p = 0.015), and DWI-positive lesions (adjusted OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01–0.19; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The SE is safe and easy to deploy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Availability of data and material

The study data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OR:

Odds ratio

PED:

Pipeline embolization device

SE:

Surpass Evolve flow diverter

SS:

Surpass Streamline flow diverter

References

  1. Orru E, Rice H, De Villiers L, Klostranec JM, Wakhloo AK, Coon AL, Radovanovic I, Kortman H, Bhatia KD, Krings T, Pereira VM (2020) First clinical experience with the new Surpass Evolve flow diverter: technical and clinical considerations. J Neurointerv Surg 12:974–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maus V, Weber W, Berlis A, Maurer C, Fischer S (2020) Initial experience with Surpass Evolve flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00972-5

  3. Sadasivan C, Fiorella D (2020) Preliminary in vitro angiographic comparison of the flow diversion behavior of Evolve and Pipeline devices. J Neurointerv Surg 12:616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows AM, Cloft H, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G (2015) Periprocedural and mid-term technical and clinical events after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 7:646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, De Witte O (2011) Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg 76:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, Taschner C, Lundquist J, Biondi A, Hartmann M, Szikora I, Pierot L, Sakai N, Imamura H, Sourour N, Rennie I, Skalej M, Beuing O, Bonafe A, Mery F, Turjman F, Brouwer P, Boccardi E, Valvassori L, Derakhshani S, Litzenberg MW, Gounis MJ, Surpass Study G (2015) Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, Hasan D, Pema PJ, Gould G, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour PM (2013) Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2326–2330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsai YH, Wong HF, Hsu SW (2020) Endovascular management of spontaneous delayed migration of the flow-diverter stent. J Neuroradiol 47:38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, Nelson PK, Siddiqui A, Jabbour P, Pereira VM, Szikora Istvan I, Zaidat OO, Bettegowda C, Colby GP, Mokin M, Schirmer C, Hellinger FR, Given Ii C, Krings T, Taussky P, Toth G, Fraser JF, Chen M, Priest R, Kan P, Fiorella D, Frei D, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Diaz O, Malek AM, Cawley CM, Puri AS (2020) Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg 12:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Boccardi E, Ciceri E, Diaz O, Tawk R, Woo H, Jabbour P, Albuquerque F, Chapot R, Bonafe A, Dashti SR, Delgado Almandoz JE, Given C 2nd, Kelly ME, Cross DT 3rd, Duckwiler G, Razack N, Powers CJ, Fischer S, Lopes D, Harrigan MR, Huddle D, Rt T, Zaidat OO, Defreyne L, Pereira VM, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Lylyk P, McDougall C, Siddiqui A, Szikora I, Levy E (2016) Aneurysm study of pipeline in an observational registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 5:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafe A, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Jabbour P, Levy E, McDougall C, Siddiqui A, Szikora I, Woo H, Albuquerque F, Bozorgchami H, Dashti SR, Delgado Almandoz JE, Kelly ME, Rt T, Woodward BK, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Lylyk P (2015) International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:108–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu JM, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li T, Leng B, Zhang P, Liang G, Huang Q, Yang PF, Shi H, Zhang J, Wan J, He W, Liang C, Zhu G, Xu Y, Hong B, Yang X, Bai W, Tian Y, Zhang H, Li Z, Li Q, Zhao R, Fang Y, Zhao K, investigators P, (2018) Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the tubridge flow diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyers PM, Coon AL, Kan PT, Wakhloo AK, Hanel RA (2019) SCENT trial. Stroke 50:1473–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:34–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, Aggour M, Piotin M, Biondi A, Barreau X, Mounayer C, Papagiannaki C, Lejeune JP, Gauvrit JY, Derelle AL, Chabert E, Costalat V (2019) SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results. J Neurointerv Surg 11:184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2013) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 44:442–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raymond J, Gentric JC, Darsaut TE, Iancu D, Chagnon M, Weill A, Roy D (2017) Flow diversion in the treatment of aneurysms: a randomized care trial and registry. J Neurosurg 127:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF (2016) Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 58:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin LM, Colby GP, Bender MT, Xu R, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL (2017) Use of the 0.027-inch VIA microcatheter for delivery of Pipeline Flex: a technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 9:689–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK (2013) Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267:858–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jabbour P, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Dumont AS, Randazzo C, Starke RM, Hasan D, Chitale R, Singhal S, Moukarzel LA, Rosenwasser R (2013) The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 73:113–120 discussion 120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Galdamez M, Lamin SM, Lagios KG, Liebig T, Ciceri EF, Chapot R, Stockx L, Chavda S, Kabbasch C, Farago G, Nordmeyer H, Boulanger T, Piano M, Boccardi EP (2017) Periprocedural outcomes and early safety with the use of the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results from a prospective clinical study. J Neurointerv Surg 9:772–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bender MT, Colby GP, Lin LM, Jiang B, Westbroek EM, Xu R, Campos JK, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL (2018) Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 130:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bond KM, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G (2017) Diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemic lesions following endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:304–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pyoung Jeon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB File No. 2021–01-176–001). All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

A waiver of consent was approved by the institutional review board (IRB File No. 2021–01-176–001). This study involves no more than minimal risk to the subject and the waiver will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jee, T.K., Yeon, J.Y., Kim, K.H. et al. Early clinical experience of using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 64, 343–351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02793-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02793-w

Keywords