Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of cavernous malformations after whole-brain radiotherapy in primitive neuroectodermal tumor patients—comparing susceptibility-weighted imaging and T2 gradient-echo sequences

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the value of the susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequence compared to gradient echo (GRE) in the detection and follow-up of cavernous malformations in patients who underwent whole-brain irradiation as part of their medulloblastoma treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively examined MRI studies of 28 subjects (16 males, 12 females) who received whole-brain irradiation as part of their treatment. Ages at irradiation ranged from 2 to 38 years. All patients were periodically followed up with MR imaging (ranging from 9 to 336 months). Two neuroradiologists reviewed studies of the same patients, comparing the number of suspected cavernomas detected on GRE and SWI sequences performed at different times (median time between studies, 10 months).

Results

Hypointense lesions were detected in 24 subjects on SWI sequences and in 19 subjects on GRE sequences. More lesions were seen on SWI than on GRE (p = 0.006). Four patients had no detectable lesions. The minimal period from irradiation to first lesion detection was 14 months. Cavernomas larger than 3 mm were detected in 14 subjects by both GRE and SWI. None of the subjects had symptoms related to cavernomas.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of SWI in the detection of hypointense lesions in patients after whole-brain irradiation is significantly higher than that of the GRE sequence. It appears that almost all subjects eventually develop small hypointense lesions after radiotherapy, and some of them progress to cavernous malformations. The clinical significance of the increased sensitivity of SWI in this group of patients is not entirely certain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

WBRT:

Whole-brain radiation therapy

CM:

Cavernous malformation

PNET:

Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

References

  1. American Brain Tumor Association. Types of tumor. http://www.abta.org/brain-tumor-information/types-of-tumors/medulloblastoma.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2018

  2. Ciricillo SF, Cogen PH, Edwards MS (1994) Pediatric cryptic vascular malformations: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Neurosurg 20:137–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters S, Pahl R, Claviez A, Jansen O (2013) Detection of irreversible changes in susceptibility-weighted images after whole-brain irradiation of children. Neuroradiology 55:853–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lew SM, Morgan JN, Psaty E, Lefton DR, Allen JC, Abbott R (2006) Cumulative incidence of radiation-induced cavernomas in long-term survivors of medulloblastoma. Neurosurgery 104:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yamasaki F, Takayasu T, Nosaka R, Kenjo M, Akiyama Y, Tominaga A, Sugiyama K, Kobayashi M, Kurisu K (2015) The postirradiation incidence of cavernous angioma is higher in patients with childhood pineoblastoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumors than medulloblastoma. Childs Nerv Syst 31:901–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgartner JE, Ater JL, Ha CS, Kuttesch JF, Leeds NE, Fuller GN, Wilson RJ (2003) Pathologically proven cavernous angiomas of the brain following radiation therapy for pediatric brain tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Souza JM, Domingues RC, Cruz LC Jr, Domingues FS, Iasbeck T, Gasparetto EL (2008) Susceptibility-weighted imaging for the evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations: a comparison with t2-weighted fast spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulut HT, Sarica MA, Baykan AH (2014) The value of susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous angioma. Clin Exp Med Int J 72:5296–5302

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zabramski JM, Wascher TM, Spetzler RF, Johnson B, Golfinos J, Drayer BP, Brown B, Rigamonti D, Brown G (1994) The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study. Neurosurgery 80:422–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Giannatale A, Morana G, Rossi A et al (2014) Natural history of cavernous malformations in children with brain tumors treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J Neuro-Oncol 117:311–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sparacia G, Speciale C, Banco A, Bencivinni F, Midiri M (2016) Accuracy of SWI sequences compared to T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences in the detection of cerebral cavernous malformations in the familial form. Neuroradiol J 29:326–335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng AL, Batool S, McCreary CR, Lauzon ML, Frayne R, Goyal M, Smith EE (2013) Susceptibility-weighted imaging is more reliable than T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo MRI for detecting microbleeds. Stroke 44:2782–2786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo LF, Wang G, Zhu XY, Liu C, Cui L (2013) Comparison of ESWAN, SWI-SPGR, and 2D T2*-weighted GRE sequence for depicting cerebral microbleeds. Clin Neuroradiol 23:121–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain R, Robertson PL, Gandhi D, Gujar SK, Muraszko KM, Gebarski S (2005) Radiation-induced cavernomas of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiology 26:1158–1162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cha YJ, Nahm JH, Ko JE, Shin HJ, Chang J-H, Cho NH (2015) Pathological evaluation of radiation-induced vascular lesions of the brain: distinct from de novo cavernous hemangioma. Yonsei Med J 56:1714–1720

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pagenstecher A, Stahl S, Sure U, Felbor U (2009) A two-hit mechanism causes cerebral cavernous malformations: complete inactivation of CCM1, CCM2 or CCM3 in affected endothelial cells. Hum Mol Genet 18:911–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haasdijk RA, Cheng C, Maat-Kievit AJ, Duckers HJ (2012) Cerebral cavernous malformations: from molecular pathogenesis to genetic counselling and clinical management. Eur J Hum Genet 20:134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Lanzino G, Link MJ, Brown RD Jr, Flemming KD (2015) Characterization of radiation-induced cavernous malformations and comparison with a nonradiation cavernous malformation cohort. J Neurosurg 122:1214–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mouchtouris N, Chalouhi N, Chitale A, Starke RM, Tjoumakaris SI, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour PM (2015) Management of cerebral cavernous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment. ScientificWorldJournal 2015:808314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim Khasminsky.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khasminsky, V., Yalon, M., Greenberg, G. et al. Detection of cavernous malformations after whole-brain radiotherapy in primitive neuroectodermal tumor patients—comparing susceptibility-weighted imaging and T2 gradient-echo sequences. Neuroradiology 60, 913–919 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2055-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2055-8

Keywords

Navigation