Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of heat recovery of diesel engine using intermediate working fluid

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is an effective way to recovery the engine exhaust heat. The thermal stability of the evaporation system is significant for the stable operation of the ORC system. In this paper, the performance of the designed evaporation system which combines with the intermediate fluid for recovering the exhaust waste heat from a diesel engine is evaluated. The thermal characteristics of the target diesel engine exhaust gas are evaluated based on the experimental data firstly. Then, the mathematical model of the evaporation system is built based on the geometrical parameters and the specific working conditions of ORC. Finally, the heat transfer characteristics of the evaporation system are estimated corresponding to three typical operating conditions of the diesel engine. The result shows that the exhaust temperature at the evaporator outlet increases slightly with the engine speed and load. In the evaporator, the heat transfer coefficient of the Rankine working fluid is slightly larger than the intermediate fluid. However, the heat transfer coefficient of the intermediate fluid in the heat exchanger is larger than the exhaust side. The heat transfer areas of the evaporator in both the two-phase zone and the preheated zone change slightly along with the engine working condition while the heat transfer areas of the overheated zone has changed obviously. The maximum heat transfer rate occurs in the preheating zone while the minimum value occurs in the overheating zone. In addition, the Rankine working fluid temperature at the evaporator outlet is not sensitively affected by the torque and speed of the engine and the organic fluid flow is relatively stable. It is concluded that the intermediate fluid could effectively reduce the physical changes of Rankine working fluid in the evaporator outlet due to changes in engine operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Heat transfer area (m2)

b.s.f.c:

Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (g/kW h)

cρ :

Specific heat at constant pressure (kJ/kg K)

D:

Out diameter (m)

d:

Inner diameter (m)

E, S:

Correction factor

f:

Turbulent drag coefficient

G:

Mass flux (kg/m2 s)

H:

Convective heat transfer rate (W/m2 K)

h:

Enthalpy (kJ/kg)

l:

Tube length (m)

M:

Molecular weight (kg/kmol)

m:

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

mf:

Mass friction

P:

Pressure (Pa)

Q:

Heat transfer rate (kW)

q:

Heat flow density (kW/m2 K)

s:

Fin space (m)

T:

Temperature (K)

U:

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

u:

Flow rate of the THERMINOL 66 (m/s)

w:

Vapour quality

x, y:

Molar amount

Re:

Reynolds number

Pr:

Prandtl number

Nu:

Nusselt number

α:

Correction factor

γ:

Tube thickness (m)

δ:

Fin height (m)

η:

Efficiency

λ:

Thermal conductivity (W/m K)

μ:

Viscosity (kg/m s)

ρ:

Density (kg/m3)

τ:

Fin heat transfer efficiency

0:

Reference state

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6:

State points for the R245fa

a, b, c, d, x, y:

State points for the THERMINOL 66

cr:

Critical state

exh:

Exhaust gas

f:

Fluid

g:

Gas

he:

Heat exchanger

I:

State point for exhaust entrance in the heat exchanger

i:

Exhaust components:CO2, H2O, N2, O2; inner

l:

Liquid

lm:

Log mean

m:

Mean value

nb:

Nucleate boiling

O:

State point for exhaust outlet in the heat exchanger

o:

Outer

oil:

The THERMINOL 66

ph:

Preheated

ref:

The R245fa

sh:

Superheated

tp:

Two-phase

w:

Wall

References

  1. Shu GQ, Zhao J, Tian H, Wei HQ, Liang XY, Yu GP, Liu LN (2012) Theoretical analysis of engine waste heat recovery by the combined thermo-generator and organic rankine cycle system. SAE International Technical Paper. doi: 10.4271/2012-01-0636.

  2. Yun KT, Cho H, Luck R, Mago PJ (2013) Modeling of reciprocating internal combustion engines for power generation and heat recovery. Appl Energy 102:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glavatskaya YL, Podevin P, Lemort V, Shonda O, Descombes G (2012) Reciprocating expander for an exhaust heat recovery rankine cycle for a passenger car application. Energies 5:1751–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei MS, Fang JL, Ma CC, Danish Syed N (2011) Waste heat recovery from heavy-duty diesel engine exhaust gases by medium temperature ORC system. Sci China Technol Sci 54(10):2746–2753

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie H, Yang C (2013) Dynamic behavior of Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery of heavy duty diesel engines under driving cycle. Appl Energy 112:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peris B, Navarro-Esbrí J, Molés F (2013) Bottoming organic Rankine cycle configurations to increase Internal Combustion Engines power output from cooling water waste heat recovery. Appl Therm Eng 61(2–3):364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meinel D, Wieland C, Spliethoff H (2014) Effect and comparison of different working fluids on a two-stage organic rankine cycle (ORC) concept. Appl Therm Eng 63(15):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hajabdollahi Z, Hajabdollahi F, Tehrani M, Hajabdollahi H (2013) Thermo-economic environmental optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle for diesel waste heat recovery. Energy 63(15):142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu G, Shu G, Tian H et al (2013) Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) of diesel engine (DE). Energy 51:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang EH, Zhang HG, Fan BY, Ouyang MG, Zhao Y, Mu QH (2011) Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery. Energy 36(5):3406–3418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lakew AA, Bolland O (2010) Working fluids for low-temperature heat source. Appl Therm Eng 30(10):1262–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rayegan R, Tao YX (2011) A procedure to select working fluids for Solar Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs). Renew Energy 36(2):659–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung TC, Wang SK, Kuo CH, Pei BS, Tsai KF (2010) A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grad energy sources. Energy 35(3):1403–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mago PJ, Chamra LM, Somayaji C (2007) Performance analysis of different working fluids for use in organic Rankine cycles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 221:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen HJ, Goswami DY, Stefanakos EK (2010) A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):3059–3067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Pei G, Ji J (2010) Optimization of low temperature solar thermal electric generation with Organic Rankine Cycle in different areas. Appl Energy 87(11):3355–3365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo T, Wang HX, Zhang SJ (2010) Comparative analysis of CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle and HFC245fa-based subcritical organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal source. Sci China 53(6):1638–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manolakos D, Kosmadakis G, Kyritsis S, Papadakis G (2009) On site experimental evaluation of a low-temperature solar organic Rankine cycle system for RO desalination. Sol Energy 83(5):646–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dai YP, Wang JF, Lin G (2009) Exergy analysis, parametric analysis and optimization for a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. Appl Therm Eng 29(10):1983–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baik YJ, Kim MS, Chang KC, Kim SJ (2011) Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source. Appl Energy 88:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasetti Marco, Invernizzi Costante M, Iora Paolo (2014) Thermal stability of working fluids for organic Rankine cycles: an improved survey method and experimental results for cyclopentane, isopentane and n-butane. Appl Therm Eng 73(1):764–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai Xiaoye, Shi Lin, An Qingsong, Qian Weizhong (2016) Chemical kinetics method for evaluating the thermal stability of Organic Rankine Cycle working fluids. Appl Therm Eng 100:708–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Webb RL, Kim NH (2005) Principles of enhanced heat transfer, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shi MZ, Wang ZZ (2009) Principle and design of heat exchangers, 4th edn. Southeast University Press, Nanjing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang J, Wang H, Xu J et al (2013) Study on heat-transfer performance of ORC direct contact evaporators. J Chin Soc Power Eng 33(12):969–973

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang E, Zhang H, Fan B, Wu Y (2012) Optimized performances comparison of organic Rankine cycles for low grade waste heat recovery. J Mech Sci Technol 26:2301–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wikipedia, Diesel fuel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_fuel. 20 April 2015

  28. REFPROP version 9.0, NIST standard reference database 23. The US Secretary of Commerce, America (2007)

  29. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’Connell JP (2001) The properties of gases and liquids, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gu WZ, Shen JR, Ma CF, Zhang YM (1990) Enhanced heat transfer. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gnielinski V (1976) New equations for heat mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flows. Int Chem Eng 16:359–368

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Wang H, Wang H (2011) Experimental study on evaporating heat transfer characteristics of HFC-245fa. J Wuhan Univ Technol 33(3):67–71

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghiaasiaan SM (2008) Two-phase flow, boiling and condensation in conventional and miniature systems. Cambridge University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Bergman TL, Lavine AS, Incropera FP, Dewitt DP (2011) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghazi M, Ahmadi P, Sotoodeh AF, Taherkhani A (2012) Modeling and thermoeconomic optimization of heat recovery heat exchangers using a multimodal genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manage 58:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. National standard of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T 18297–2001 (2001)

  37. Kemp IC (2006) Pinch analysis and process integration: a user guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy, 2nd edn. Chemical Industrial Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wu W, Zhao L, Ho T (2012) Experimental investigation on pinch points and maximum temperature differences in a horizontal tube-in-tube evaporator using zeotropic refrigerants. Energy Convers Manag 56:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Excellent Dissertation Cultivation Funds of Wuhan University of Technology (Grant No. 2016-YS-053). The authors are grateful to all the staff of Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, L., Zhang, J., Tan, G. et al. Analysis of heat recovery of diesel engine using intermediate working fluid. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 2377–2393 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-1988-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-1988-5

Keywords

Navigation