Abstract
Individual foraging consistency is commonly seen in wild populations, even in species considered generalists and allows individuals to forage more efficiently. It may, therefore, have important consequences on ecological processes, for individuals and populations. Within seabirds, data on timescales over which consistency is maintained is lacking, despite its potential to determine how adaptable individuals and populations are to face environmental changes. Little penguins (Eudyptula minor) were tracked at two colonies in south-eastern Australia during 5 years, using GPS data loggers and dive recorders. This study investigated the presence of behavioural consistency, its persistence through time and the influence of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on behaviour and consistency. Individual consistency was compared between colonies, among consecutive foraging trips, among different breeding stages/clutches and years. Individuals showed high plasticity, with foraging metrics influenced by site, year, stage/clutch. Low to moderate short-term consistency in foraging metrics was highlighted, except for bearing. Over larger timescales, no consistency in these metrics was detected. Mass and morphology are known to influence foraging behaviour and consistency, but seemed not to affect behavioural consistency, which varied with year and site instead. This further highlights the plasticity of animals foraging on prey highly spatially and temporally variable in their distribution. We emphasize the importance of taking timescale into account when assessing behavioural consistency. Finally, mechanisms other than behavioural consistency seem to allow little penguins to find mobile food in the water column (e.g. group foraging, and switching from short to long trips at specific times of the breeding season).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agostinelli C, Lund U (2011) R package circular: circular statistics (version 0.4-3). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=circular
Araújo MS, Bolnick DI, Layman CA (2011) The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecol Lett 14:948–958. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x
Barton K (2013) R package MuMIn: Multi-model inference (version 1.9.5). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783
Berlincourt M, Arnould JPY (2014) At-sea associations in foraging little penguins. PLoS One 9:e105065
Berlincourt M, Arnould JPY (2015) Influence of environmental conditions on foraging behaviour and its consequences on reproductive performance in Little penguins. Mar Biol 162:1485–1501
Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28
Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017
Camprasse ECM, Cherel Y, Arnould JPY, Hoskins AJ, Bost CA (2017a) Combined bio-logging and stable isotopes reveal individual specialisations in a benthic coastal seabird, the Kerguelen shag. PLoS One 12:e0172278
Camprasse ECM, Cherel Y, Bustamante P, Arnould JPY, Bost CA (2017b) Intra- and inter-individual variation in the foraging ecology of a generalist subantarctic seabird, the Gentoo penguin. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. doi:10.3354/meps12151
Castillo-Guerrero JA, Lerma M, Mellink E, Suazo-Guillén E, Peñaloza-Padilla EA (2016) Environmentally-mediated flexible foraging strategies in Brown boobies in the Gulf of California. Ardea 104:33–47
Ceia FR, Ramos JA (2015) Individual specialization in the foraging and feeding strategies of seabirds: a review. Mar Biol 162:1923–1938
Ceia FR, Phillips RA, Ramos JA, Cherel Y, Vieira RP, Richard P, Xavier JC (2012) Short- and long-term consistency in the foraging niche of Wandering albatrosses. Mar Biol 159:1581–1591. doi:10.1007/s00227-012-1946-1
Chiaradia A, Nisbet ICT (2006) Plasticity in parental provisioning and chick growth in little penguins Eudyptula minor in years of high and low breeding success. Ardea 94:257–270
Chiaradia A, McBride J, Murray T, Dann P (2007a) Effect of fog on the arrival time of little penguins Eudyptula minor: a clue for visual orientation? J Ornithol 148:229–233
Chiaradia A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Mattern T, Yorke J (2007b) Diving behaviour of Little penguins from four colonies across their whole distribution range: bathymetry affecting diving effort and fledging success. Mar Biol 151:1535–1542
Chiaradia A, Forero MG, Hobson KA, Cullen JM (2010) Changes in diet and trophic position of a top predator 10 years after a mass mortality of a key prey. ICES J Mar Sci 67:1710–1720
Cook TR, Cherel Y, Tremblay Y (2006) Foraging tactics of chick-rearing Crozet shags: individuals display repetitive activity and diving patterns over time. Polar Biol 29:562–569. doi:10.1007/s00300-005-0089-y
Cook TR, Lescroël A, Cherel Y, Kato A, Bost CA (2013) Can foraging ecology drive the evolution of body size in a diving endotherm? PLoS One 8:e56297. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056297
Cullen JM, Montague TL, Hull C (1992) Food of little penguins Eudyptula minor in Victoria: comparison of three localities between 1985 and 1988. Emu 91:318–341
Dann P, Norman F (2006) Population regulation in little penguins Eudyptula minor: the role of intraspecific competition for nesting sites and food during breeding. Emu 106:289–296
Davoren GK, Montevecchi WA, Anderson JT (2003) Search strategies of a pursuit-diving marine bird and the persistence of prey patches. Ecol Monogr 73:463–481
Deagle BE, Gales NJ, Hindell MA (2008) Variability in foraging behaviour of chick-rearing Macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus and its relation to diet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:295–309
Deagle BE, Chiaradia A, McInnes J, Jarman SN (2010) Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out? Conserv Genet 11:2039–2048
Dingemanse NJ, Dochtermann NA (2013) Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. J Anim Ecol 82:39–54
Elliott KH, Woo KJ, Gaston AJ (2009) Specialization in murres: the story of eight specialists. Waterbirds 32:491–506. doi:10.1675/063.032.0402
Estes JA, Riedman ML, Staedler MM, Tinker MT, Lyon BE (2003) Individual variation in prey selection by Sea otters: patterns, causes and implications. J Anim Ecol 72:144–155. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00690.x
Fodrie FJ, Yeager LA, Grabowski JH, Layman CA, Sherwood GD, Kenworthy MD (2015) Measuring individuality in habitat use across complex landscapes: approaches, constraints, and implications for assessing resource specialization. Oecologia 178:75–87
Fullagar PJ, Heyligers PC, Crowley MA, Klomp NI (1995) Gabo Island penguin survey November 1994. MI Partners Report No 4. Moruya, NSW
Gales R, Williams C, Ritz D (1990) Foraging behaviour of the little penguin Eudyptula minor: initial results and assessment of instrument effect. J Zool 220:61–85
Grémillet D, Charmantier A (2010) Shifts in phenotypic plasticity constrain the value of seabirds as ecological indicators of marine ecosystems. Ecol Appl 20:1498–1503
Hamer K, Humphreys E, Garthe S, Hennicke J, Peters G, Grémillet D, Phillips R, Harris M, Wanless S (2007) Annual variation in diets, feeding locations and foraging behaviour of gannets in the North Sea: flexibility, consistency and constraint. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 338:295–305
Harris S, Raya Rey A, Zavalaga C, Quintana F (2014) Strong temporal consistency in the individual foraging behaviour of Imperial shags Phalacrocorax atriceps. Ibis 156:523–533. doi:10.1111/ibi.12159
Hobday DK (1991) Abundance and distribution of pilchard and Australian anchovy as prey species for the Little penguin Eudyptula minor at Phillip Island, Victoria. Emu 91:342–354
Hoskins AJ, Dann P, Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Chiaradia A, Costa DP, Arnould JPY (2008) Foraging behaviour and habitat selection of the Little penguin Eudyptula minor during early chick rearing in Bass Strait, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 366:293–303. doi:10.3354/meps07507
Ishikawa K, Watanuki Y (2002) Sex and individual differences in foraging behavior of Japanese cormorants in years of different prey availability. J Ethol 20:49–54. doi:10.1007/s10164-002-0053-z
Kato A, Watanuki Y, Nishiumi I, Kuroki M, Shaughnessy P, Naito Y (2000) Variation in foraging and parental behavior of King cormorants. Auk 117:718–730. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0718:VIFAPB]2.0.CO;2
Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y, Chiaradia A (2008) Regulation of trip duration by an inshore forager, the Little penguin Eudyptula minor, during incubation. Auk 125:588–593
Kernaléguen L, Arnould JPY, Guinet C, Cherel Y (2015a) Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and Subantarctic fur seals. J Anim Ecol 84:1081–1092. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12347
Kernaléguen L, Dorville N, Ierodiaconou D, Hoskins AJ, Baylis AMM, Hindell MA, Semmens J, Abernathy K, Marshall GJ, Cherel Y, Arnould JPY (2015b) From video recordings to whisker stable isotopes: a critical evaluation of timescale in assessing individual foraging specialisation in Australian fur seals. Oecologia 180:657–670. doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3407-2
Knudsen R, Primicerio R, Amundsen PA, Klemetsen A (2010) Temporal stability of individual feeding specialization may promote speciation. J Anim Ecol 79:161–168. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01625.x
Kowalczyk ND, Chiaradia A, Preston TJ, Reina RD (2014) Linking dietary shifts and reproductive failure in seabirds: a stable isotope approach. Funct Ecol 28:755–765
Kowalczyk ND, Reina RD, Preston TJ, Chiaradia A (2015) Environmental variability drives shifts in the foraging behaviour and reproductive success of an inshore seabird. Oecologia 178:967–979
Layman CA, Allgeier JE (2012) Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: a case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448:131–141
Lescroël A, Bost CA (2005) Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the Gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:245–261
Lima FP, Wethey DS (2012) Three decades of high-resolution coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warming. Nat Commun 3:704
Loxdale HD, Lushai G, Harvey JA (2011) The evolutionary improbability of ‘generalism’ in nature, with special reference to insects. Biol J Linn Soc 103:1–18
Luque SP (2007) Diving behaviour analysis in R. R news 7:8–14
Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2011) Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J Anim Ecol 80:294–305. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01753.x
McIntyre T, Bester MN, Bornemann H, Tosh CA, de Bruyn PJN (2017) Slow to change? Individual fidelity to three-dimensional foraging habitats in Southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina. Anim Behav 127:91–99
Novak M, Tinker MT (2015) Timescales alter the inferred strength and temporal consistency of intraspecific diet specialization. Oecologia 178:61–74
Numata M, Davis LS, Renner M (2000) Prolonged foraging trips and egg desertion in little penguins Eudyptula minor. N Z J Zool 27:277–289. doi:10.1080/03014223.2000.9518236
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2014) R package nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (version 3.1-117). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Ratcliffe N, Takahashi A, O’Sullivan C, Adlard S, Trathan PN, Harris MP, Wanless S (2013) The roles of sex, mass and individual specialisation in partitioning foraging-depth niches of a pursuit-diving predator. PLoS One 8:e79107
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Reilly PN (1974) Breeding of little penguins along the Great Australian Bight. Emu 74:198–200
Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Naito Y, Cannell BL (2003) Individual diving strategies in the Little penguin. Waterbirds 26:403–408
Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP, Daunt F, Kato A (2004) Patterns of energy acquisition by a central place forager: benefits of alternating short and long foraging trips. Behav Ecol 15:824–830
Ropert-Coudert Y, Kato A, Chiaradia A (2009) Impact of small-scale environmental perturbations on local marine food resources: a case study of a predator, the Little penguin. Proc Biol Sci 276:4105–4109. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1399
Saraux C, Robinson-Laverick SM, Le Maho Y, Ropert-Coudert Y, Chiaradia A (2011) Plasticity in foraging strategies of inshore birds: how little penguins maintain body reserves while feeding offspring. Ecology 92:1909–1916
Stahel C, Gales R, Burrell J (1987) Little penguin: Fairy penguins in Australia. New South Wales University Press, Kensington
Sumner MD (2009) Trip: tools for the analysis of animal track data (R package version 1.1-17). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trip
Sutton GJ, Hoskins AJ, Arnould JPY (2015) Benefits of group foraging depend on prey type in a small marine predator, the Little penguin. PLoS One 10:e0144297
Vander Zanden HB, Bolten AB, Tucker AD, Hart KM, Lamont MM, Fujisaki I, Reich KJ, Addison DS, Mansfield KL, Phillips KF (2016) Biomarkers reveal sea turtles remained in oiled areas following the deepwater horizon oil spill. Ecol Appl 26:2145–2155
Wanless S, Harris MP (1993) Use of mutually exclusive foraging areas by adjacent colonies of Blue-eyed shags Phalacrocorax atriceps at South Georgia. Colon Waterbirds 16:176–182
Watanuki Y, Ishikawa K, Takahashi A, Kato A (2004) Foraging behavior of a generalist marine top predator, Japanese cormorants Phalacrocorax filamentosus, in years of demersal versus epipelagic prey. Mar Biol 145:427–434. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1345-3
Woo KJ, Elliott KH, Davidson M, Gaston AJ, Davoren GK (2008) Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. J Anim Ecol 77:1082–1091. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01429.x
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Statistics for biology and health. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet JM, Tsiatis a, Wong W (eds) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY
Acknowledgements
This study was approved by the Deakin University ethics committee and therefore meets ethics guidelines. The assistance of numerous volunteers in data collection, including Selina Kent, Lauren Angel and Melanie Wells, is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Norman Ratcliffe for providing advice on statistical analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Deakin University ethics committee, which approved the study. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Funding
The study was funded in part by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment and the Winifred Violet Scott Trust.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V. H. Paiva.
Reviewed by K. Shiomi and an undisclosed expert.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Camprasse, E.C.M., Sutton, G.J., Berlincourt, M. et al. Changing with the times: little penguins exhibit flexibility in foraging behaviour and low behavioural consistency. Mar Biol 164, 169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3193-y