Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Putting the brakes on the brakes: negative emotion disrupts cognitive control network functioning and alters subsequent stopping ability

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to inhibit unwanted responses is critical for effective control of behavior, and inhibition failures can have disastrous consequences in real-world situations. Here, we examined how prior exposure to negative emotional stimuli affects the response-stopping network. Participants performed the stop-signal task, which relies on inhibitory control processes, after they viewed blocks of either negatively emotional or neutral images. In Experiment 1, we found that neural activity was reduced following negative image viewing. When participants were required to inhibit responding after neutral image viewing, we observed activation consistent with previous studies using the stop-signal task. However, when participants were required to inhibit responding after negative image viewing, we observed reductions in the activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, and parietal cortex. Furthermore, analysis of neural connectivity during stop-signal task blocks indicated that across participants, emotion-induced changes in behavioral performance were associated with changes in functional connectivity, such that greater behavioral impairment after negative image viewing was associated with greater weakening of connectivity. In Experiment 2, we collected behavioral data from a larger sample of participants and found that stopping performance was impaired after negative image viewing, as seen in longer stop-signal reaction times. The present results demonstrate that negative emotional events can prospectively disrupt the neural network supporting response inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Anderson AK (2005) Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:258–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2007a) Non-linear optimisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA1. FMRIB Centre, Oxford

  • Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2007b) Non-linear registration aka spatial normalisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Centre, Oxford

  • Aron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (2003) Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci 6:115–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cognit Sci 8:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2014) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cognit Sci 18:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band GPH, van der Molen MW, Logan GD (2003) Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol 112:105–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2003) General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. Neuroimage 20:1052–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman ET, Burklund L, Lieberman MD (2009) Inhibitory spillover: intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage 47:705–712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain SR, Hampshire A, Muller U, Rubia K, del Campo N, Craig K, Regenthal R, Suckling J, Roiser JP, Grant JE, Bullmore ET, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2009) Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 65:550–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers CD, Bellgrove MA, Stokes MG, Henderson TR, Garavan H, Robertson IH, Morris AP, Mattingley JB (2006) Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe. J Cognit Neurosci 18:444–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA (2009) Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:631–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chepenik LG, Cornew LA, Farah MJ (2007) The influence of sad mood on cognition. Emotion 7:802–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JR, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD (2013) Intentional and incidental self-control in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT (eds) Principles of frontal lobe function, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 417–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan-Glauser ES, Gross JJ (2011) The temporal dynamics of two response-focused forms of emotion regulation: experiential, expressive, and autonomic consequences. Psychophysiology 48:1309–1322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer J, Tibboel H (2010) Stop what you are not doing! Emotional pictures interfere with the task not to respond. Psychon Bull Rev 17:699–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ (1997) Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6:218–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartikainen KM, Siiskonen AR, Ogawa KH (2012) Threat interferes with response inhibition. NeuroReport 23:447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson M, Smith S (2001) A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 5:143–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17:825–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalanthroff E, Cohen N, Henik A (2013) Stop feeling: inhibition of emotional interference following stop-signal trials. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane RD, Chua PML, Dolan RJ (1999) Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia 37:989–997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2008) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8. University of Florida, Gainsville

  • Lenartowicz A, Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Poldrack RA (2011) Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues. J Cognit Neurosci 23:3388–3399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom BR, Bohlin G (2012) Threat-relevance impairs executive functions: negative impact on working memory and response inhibition. Emotion 12:384–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 189–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren DG, Ries ML, Xu G, Johnson SC (2012) A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. Neuroimage 61:1277–1286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner KN (2000) Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. J Exp Psychol Gen 129:242–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly JX, Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM, Johansen-Berg H (2012) Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 7:604–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawliczek CM, Derntl B, Kellermann T, Kohn N, Gur RC, Habel U (2013) Inhibitory control and trait aggression: neural and behavioral insights using the emotional stop signal task. Neuroimage 79:264–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa L (2009) How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends Cognit Sci 13:160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa L, Padmala S, Kenzer A, Bauer A (2012) Interactions between cognition and emotion during response inhibition. Emotion 12:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetez MML, Rochat L, Billieux J, Gay P, Van der Linden M (2015) Do emotional stimuli interfere with two distinct components of inhibition? Cognit Emot 29:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagaspe P, Schwartz S, Vuilleumier P (2011) Fear and stop: a role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals. Neuroimage 55:1825–1835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood J, Fitzgerald A, Miles LK, Phillips LH (2009) Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion 9:271–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale LA, Morrison RG, Kmiecik MJ, Garbarino J, Silton RL (2015) Emotionally anesthetized: media violence induces neural changes during emotional face processing. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 10:1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabibnia G, Monterosso JR, Baicy K, Aron AR, Poldrack RA, Chakrapani S, Lee B, London ED (2011) Different forms of self-control share a neurocognitive substrate. J Neurosci 31:4805–4810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, De Houwer J (2007) Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cognit Emot 21:391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008a) Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. J Exp Psychol Gen 137:649–672

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008b) Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cognit Sci 12:418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier P (2005) How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cognit Sci 9:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolrich M (2008) Robust group analysis using outlier inference. Neuroimage 41:286–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM (2001) Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 14:1370–1386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2004) Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 21:1732–1747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worsley KJ (2001) Statistical analysis of activation images. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM (eds) Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu JX, Hung DL, Tseng P, Tzeng OJL, Muggleton NG, Juan CH (2012) Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control. Cognition 124:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship to T. K. Patterson (DGE-0707424), start-up funds provided by the University of Oregon to E. T. Berkman, a James S. McDonnell Foundation grant to R. A. Poldrack, and a National Science Foundation grant to B. J. Knowlton (BCS-0848246). We thank Lauren Skellern, Darren Liu, Chloe Su, and Carolyn Prina for assistance with data collection and Katherine Misogas for assistance with data analysis. We also thank Jeanette Mumford for advising on the neuroimaging analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Tara K. Patterson, Danni Ji & Barbara J. Knowlton

  2. Semel Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Agatha Lenartowicz

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

    Elliot T. Berkman

  4. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Russell A. Poldrack

Authors
  1. Tara K. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agatha Lenartowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elliot T. Berkman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Danni Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Russell A. Poldrack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Barbara J. Knowlton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara K. Patterson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patterson, T.K., Lenartowicz, A., Berkman, E.T. et al. Putting the brakes on the brakes: negative emotion disrupts cognitive control network functioning and alters subsequent stopping ability. Exp Brain Res 234, 3107–3118 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4709-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4709-2

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Agatha Lenartowicz View author profile