Abstract
It has been suggested that tactile perception becomes less acute during movement to optimize motor control and to prevent an overload of afferent information generated during action. This empirical phenomenon, known as “tactile gating effect,” has been associated with mechanisms of sensory feedback prediction. However, less attention has been given to the tactile attenuation effect during the observation of an action. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how the observation of a goal-directed action influences tactile perception as during overt action. In a first experiment, we recorded vocal reaction times (RTs) of participants to tactile stimulations during the observation of a reach-to-grasp action. The stimulations were delivered on different body parts that could be either congruent or incongruent with the observed effector (the right hand and the right leg, respectively). The tactile stimulation was contrasted with a no body-related stimulation (an auditory beep). We found increased RTs for tactile congruent stimuli compared to both tactile incongruent and auditory stimuli. This effect was reported only during the observation of the reaching phase, whereas RTs were not modulated during the grasping phase. A tactile two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) discrimination task was then conducted in order to quantify the changes in tactile sensitivity during the observation of the same goal-directed actions. In agreement with the first experiment, the tactile perceived intensity was reduced only during the reaching phase. These results suggest that tactile processing during action observation relies on a process similar to that occurring during action execution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11:1109–1116. doi:10.1038/nn.2182
Avenanti A, Bolognini N, Maravita A, Aglioti SM (2007) Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Curr Biol 17:2129–2135. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.045
Avikainen S, Forss N, Hari R (2002) Modulated activation of the human SI and SII cortices during observation of hand actions. Neuroimage 15:640–646. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1029
Aziz-Zadeh L, Maeda F, Zaidel E et al (2002) Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study. Exp Brain Res 144:127–131. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1037-5
Banks WP (1973) Reaction time as a measure of summation of warmth. Percept Psychophys 13(2):321–327
Bays PM, Wolpert DM (2007) Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578:387–396. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120121
Bays PM, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM (2006) Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biol 4:e28. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040028
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR et al (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400–404. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x
Buckingham G, Carey DP, Colino FL et al (2010) Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches. Exp Brain Res 201:411–419. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2050-8
Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:726–736. doi:10.1038/nrn1775
Chapman C, Bushnell M (1987) Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp Brain 68:516–524
Colavita FB (1974) Human sensory dominance. Percept Psychophys 16:409–412. doi:10.3758/BF03203962
Colino FL, Buckingham G, Cheng DT et al (2014) Tactile gating in a reaching and grasping task. Physiol Rep 2:e00267. doi:10.1002/phy2.267
Costantini M, Ambrosini E, Cardellicchio P, Sinigaglia C (2014) How your hand drives my eyes. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:705–711. doi:10.1093/scan/nst037
Deschrijver E, Wiersema JR, Brass M (2015) The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: An action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm. Soc Cogn Affect. Neurosci pii:nsv081 [Epub ahead of print]
Di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L et al (1992) Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91:176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027
Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
Ferri F, Costantini M, Salone A et al (2013) Upcoming tactile events and body ownership in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.026
Ferri F, Tajadura-Jiménez A, Väljamäe A et al (2015) Emotion-inducing approaching sounds shape the boundaries of multisensory peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 70:468–475. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.001
Gangitano M, Mottaghy FM, Pascual-Leone A (2001) Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation. NeuroReport 12:1489–1492. doi:10.1097/00001756-200105250-00038
Gescheider GA, Wright JH, Weber BJ, Barton WG (1971) Absolute thresholds in vibrotactile signal detection. Percept Psychophys 10:413–417. doi:10.3758/BF03210324
Hartcher-O’Brien J, Gallace A, Krings B et al (2008) When vision “extinguishes” touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp Brain Res 186:643–658. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1272-5
Juravle G, Spence C (2011) Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression. Exp Brain Res 213:87–97. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2780-2
Juravle G, Deubel H, Tan HZ, Spence C (2010) Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behav Brain Res 208:391–401. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.009
Juravle G, Deubel H, Spence C (2011) Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 138:302–310. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.001
Kilner JM, Vargas C, Duval S et al (2004) Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nat Neurosci 7:1299–1301. doi:10.1038/nn1355
Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279. doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4
Milne RJ, Aniss AM, Kay NE, Gandevia SC (1988) Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study. Exp Brain Res 70:569–576. doi:10.1007/BF00247604
Murray HG (1970) Stimulus intensity and reaction time: evaluation of a decision-theory model. J Exp Psychol 84:383–391. doi:10.1037/h0029284
Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movement of the human hand. J Bone Jt Surg Br 38-B:902–913
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Piéron H (1913) II. recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensites excitatrices. Annee Psychol 20(1):17–96
Pins D, Bonnet C (1996) On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: pieron’s law and choice reaction time. Percept Psychophys 58:390–400. doi:10.3758/BF03206815
Quandt LC, Marshall PJ, Bouquet CA, Shipley TF (2013) Somatosensory experiences with action modulate alpha and beta power during subsequent action observation. Brain Res 1534:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.043
Rossi S, Tecchio F, Pasqualetti P et al (2002) Somatosensory processing during movement observation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 113:16–24
Rushton DN, Rothwell JC, Craggs MD (1981) Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain 104:465–491
Sato A (2008) Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others’ actions. Conscious Cogn 17:1219–1227. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.01.003
Shergill SS, White TP, Joyce DW et al (2014) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of impaired sensory prediction in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 71:28–35. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2974
Sinnett S, Spence C, Soto-Faraco S (2007) Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Percept Psychophys 69:673–686. doi:10.3758/BF03193770
Strafella AP, Paus T (2000) Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. NeuroReport 11:2289–2292
Synofzik M, Thier P, Leube DT et al (2010) Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain 133:262–271. doi:10.1093/brain/awp291
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Teichner WH (1954) Recent studies of simple reaction time. Psychol Bull 51:128–149. doi:10.1037/h0060900
Urgesi C, Maieron M, Avenanti A et al (2010) Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cereb Cortex 20:2511–2521. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp292
Voisin JIA, Rodrigues EC, Hétu S et al (2011) Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions. Exp Brain Res 208:11–19. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2448-3
Von Holst E (1954) Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Br J Anim Behav 2:89–94. doi:10.1016/S0950-5601(54)80044-X
Voss M, Ingram JN, Haggard P, Wolpert DM (2006) Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nat Neurosci 9:26–27. doi:10.1038/nn1592
Voss M, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM, Haggard P (2008) Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals. PLoS ONE 3:e2866. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002866
Williams SR, Chapman CE (2000) Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of Stimulus Intensity.J Neurophysiol 84:863–875
Wilson M, Knoblich G (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol Bull 131:460–473. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
WMA General Assembly (2008) World Medical Asssociation Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (as amended by the 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, October 2008). World Med Assoc 0
Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11:R729–R732
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a bilateral France-Brésil Grant CAPES-COFECUB (Project No. 819-14). We thank Pasquale Cardellicchio and Alice Tomassini for their useful suggestions, Laura Taverna for the pictures and Arren Glover for the English revision of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vastano, R., Inuggi, A., Vargas, C.D. et al. Tactile perception during action observation. Exp Brain Res 234, 2585–2594 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4663-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4663-z