Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of our current understanding of human prehension in a comparative context is based on macaque models in a sitting, constrained body posture. In a previous study, we clearly showed differences in the amplitude of the forelimb joints between five primate species (lemur, capuchin, chimpanzee, gorilla and human) during unconstrained grasping where the animals were free to choose their body posture. One of our interrogations was to know if these differences could be due to the body posture. To address this question, this study compares humans with new data for gorillas during an unconstrained food prehension task in two body postures, a sitting and a quadrupedal one. The objective is to determine the behavioral and kinematic strategies (amplitudes and patterns of evolution of the articular angles) as well as differences and invariants of trunk and forelimb motions between species. The subjects were recorded by five cameras, and landmarks were digitized frame by frame to reconstruct 3D movement. Our results show that (1) despite significant influences of body postures on ranges of motion in gorillas and humans, species preserve their specific forelimb joint and trunk contribution; (2) body posture has a limited effect on the basic pattern of wrist velocity. Our study indicates that different primate species have specific kinematic features of limb coordination during prehension, which dose not alter with changes in posture. Therefore, across varying species, it is possible to compare limb kinematics irrespective of postural constraints and unconstrained condition need to be explored in other primates to understand the evolution of primate prehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts P, Van Damme R, Van Elsaker L, Duchene V (2000) Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of the hind-limb cycles during voluntary bipedal and quadrupedal walking in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Am J Phys Anthropol 111:503–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold K, Matthews LJ, Nunn C (2010) The 10k trees website: a new online resource for primate phylogeny. Evol Anthropol 19:114–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:726–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Paulignan Y (1992) Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching. Behav Brain Res 50:7–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan LK (2007) Scapular position in primates. Folia Primatol 78:19–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan LK (2008) The range of passive arm circumduction in primates: do hominoids really have more mobile shoulders? Am J Phys Anthropol 136:265–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christel MI (1993) Grasping techniques and hand preferences in apes and humans. In: Preuschoft H, Chivers DJ (eds) Hands of primates. Springer-Verlag, New-York, pp 91–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christel MI (1994) Catarrhine primates grasping small objects: techniques and hand preference. In: Anderson JR, Roeder JJ, Thierry B, Herrenschmidt N (eds) Current primatology vol III: behavioural and neuroscience, physiology and reproduction. Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, pp 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Christel MI, Billard A (2002) Comparison between macaques’ and humans’ kinematics of prehension: the role of morphological differences and control mechanisms. Behav Brain Res 131:169–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran DM (1996) Comparative positional behavior of the African apes. In: McGrew W, Marchant L, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213–224

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fogassi L, Gallese V, Buccino G, Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2001) Cortical mechanism for the visual guidance of hand grasping movements in the monkey: a reversible inactivation study. Brain 124(Pt 3):571–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner DL, Mark LS, Ward JA, Edkins H (2001) How do the task characteristics affect the transitions between seated and standing reaches? Ecol Psychol 13:245–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham KM, Moore KD, Cabel DW, Gribble PL, Cisek P, Scott SH (2003) Kinematics and kinetics of multijoint reaching in nonhuman primates. J Neurophysiol 89:2667–2677

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand DJ, Taylor CC (1987) Multivariate analysis of variance and repeated measures: a practical approach for behavioural scientists. Chapman and Hall, London, p 262

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1999) On the other hand: statistical issues in the assessment and interpretation of hand preference data in nonhuman primates. Int J Primatol 20:851–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt KD (2004) The special demands of great ape locomotion and posture. In: Russon AE, Begun DR (eds) The evolution of thought: evolutionary origins of great ape intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isler K (2005) 3D-kinematics of vertical climbing in hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:66–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jindrich DL, Courtine G, Liu JJ, McKay HL, Moseanko R, Bernot TJ, Roy RR, Zhong H, Tuszynski MH, Edgerton VR (2011) Unconstrained three-dimensional reaching in Rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 209:35–50

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kudoh N, Hattori M, Numata N, Maruyama K (1997) An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effect of object size and distance. Exp Brain Res 117:457–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson SG (1993) Functional morphology of the shoulder in primates. In: Gebo DL (ed) Postcranial adaptation in nonhuman primates. Northnern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, pp 45–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athènes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sc 9:149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pouydebat E, Berge C, Gorce P, Coppens Y (2005) Use and manufacture of tools to extract food by captive Gorilla gorilla gorilla: experimental approach. Folia Primatol 76:180–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pouydebat E, Berge C, Gorce P, Coppens Y (2006) Prehension among primates: precision, tools and evolutionary perspectives. In thematic issue, one hundred years after Marey: some aspects of functional morphology today. Comptes Rendus Palevol de l’Académie des Sciences 5:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouydebat E, Gorce P, Bels V (2009) Biomechanical study of grasping according to the volume of the object: human versus non human primates. J Biomech 42(3–9):266–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouydebat E, Laurin M, Gorce P, Bels V (2008) Evolution of grasping among anthropoids. J Evol Biol 21:1732–1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reghem E, Chèze L, Coppens Y, Pouydebat E (2013) Grasping’s kinematic in five primates: lemur catta, Sapajus xanthosternos, Gorilla gorilla, Pan troglodytes Homo sapiens. J Hum Evol 65:303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remis MJ (1995) Use of trees by lowland gorillas: the importance of body size and social context. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:413–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Farnè A, Jouffrais C, Boussaoud D (2000) Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey. Behav Brain Res 117:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Meunier M, Boussaoud D (2002) Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of object size and location. J Neurophysiol 88:1491–1499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF (2002) Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. J Neurosci 22:1426–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori L, Camperio-Ciani A, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U (2013a) Reaching and grasping behavior in Macaca fascicularis: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res 224:119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori L, Camperio-Ciani A, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U (2013b) Reach-to-grasp movements in Macaca fascicularis monkeys: the Isochrony principle at work. Front Psychol 4:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SH, Kalaska JF (1997) Reaching movements with similar paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex. Am Phys Soc 77:826–852

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JS, Corcos DM, Hasan Z (2004) Kinematic and kinetic constraints on arm, trunk, and leg segments in target-reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 93:352–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle RH, Watts DP (1985) The positional behavior and adaptive complexes of Pan gorilla. In: Kondo S (ed) Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses and human bipedalism. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, pp 261–288

  • Virji-Babul N, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1994) Effects of gravitational forces on single joint arm movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 99:338–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, van der Helm FC, Veeger HE, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38:981–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the fondation “Marcel Bleustein Blanchet pour la vocation” and by the Action Transversale du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France) “Formes possibles, Formes réalisées.” We are especially grateful to the director of the zoo La Palmyre, Mr Caillé and the veterinary Mr Petit, who permitted us to conduct this study. We also wish to thank the staff of the Zoo, particularly Ronald Bosse, Redouane Lajali and Michel Carette, for their assistance during this study. We also thank Pauline Provini, Anthony Herrel, Antony Borel and Paul-Antoine Libourel for their help and relevant remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Pouydebat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reghem, E., Chèze, L., Coppens, Y. et al. The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla). Exp Brain Res 232, 1047–1056 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3817-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3817-5

Keywords

Navigation