Skip to main content
Log in

The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intercepting a moving object while locomoting is a highly complex and demanding ability. Notwithstanding the identification of several informational candidates, the role of perceptual variables in the control process underlying such skills remains an open question. In this study we used a virtual reality set-up for studying locomotor interception of a moving ball. The subject had to walk along a straight path and could freely modify forward velocity, if necessary, in order to intercept—with the head—a ball moving along a straight path that led it to cross the agent’s displacement axis. In a series of experiments we manipulated a local (ball size) and a global (focus of expansion) component of the visual flow but also the egocentric orientation of the ball. The experimental observations are well captured by a dynamic model linking the locomotor acceleration to properties of both global flow and egocentric direction. More precisely the changes in locomotor velocity depend on a linear combination of the change in bearing angle and the change in egocentric orientation, allowing the emergence of adaptive behavior under a variety of circumstances. We conclude that the mechanisms underlying the control of different goal-directed locomotion tasks (i.e. steering and interceptive tasks) could share a common architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bootsma RJ (1998) Ecological movement principles and how much information matters. In: Post AA, Pijpers JR, Bosch P, Boschker MSJ (eds) Models in human movement sciences. Print Partners Ipskamp, Enschede, pp 51–63

  • Bootsma RJ, Craig CM (2002) Global and local contributions to the optical specification of time to contact: Observer sensitivity to composite tau. Perception 31:901–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Oudejans RD (1993) Visual information about time to collision between two objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1041–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Peper CE (1992) Predictive visual information sources for the regulation of action with special emphasis on catching and hitting. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 285–314

  • Bootsma RJ, Fayt V, Zaal FTJM, Laurent M (1997) On the information-based regulation of movement: things Wann (1996) may want to consider. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1282–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chardenon A, Montagne G, Buekers MJ, Laurent G (2002) The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion. Neurosci Lett 334:13–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting JE (1986) Perception with an eye for motion. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Cutting JE (1991) Four ways to reject directed perception. Ecol Psyc 3:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting JE, Vishton PM, Braren PA (1995) How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. Psychol Rev 102:627–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davids K, Stratford R (1989) Peripheral vision and simple catching: the screen paradigm revisited. J Sport Sci 7:139–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Rugy A, Montagne G, Buekers MJ, Laurent M (2000) The study of locomotor pointing in virtual reality: the validation of a test set-up. Behav Res Methods Instr Comp 32:215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajen BR, Warren WH (2000) Go with the flow. Trends Cogn Sci 4:369–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fajen FR, Warren WH (2004) Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target on foot. (submitted)

  • Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

  • Harris JM, Bonas W (2002) Optic flow and scene structure do not always contribute to the control of human walking. Vision Res 42:1619–1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DM, Michaels CF (2004) The education of attention and calibration in one-handed catching. (submitted)

  • Laurent M, Montagne G, Durey A (1996) Binocular invariants in interceptive tasks: a directed perception approach. Perception 25:1437–1450

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir M, Musch E, Janssens M, Thiery E, Uyttenhove J (1999a) Intercepting moving objects during self-motion. J Motor Behav 31:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir M, Savelsbergh GJ, Musch E, Thiery E, Uyttenhove J, Janssens M (1999b) Intercepting moving objects during self-motion: effects of environmental changes. Res Q Exerc Sport 70:349–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir M, Musch E, Thiery E, Savelsbergh GJ (2002) Rate of change of angular bearing as the relevant property in a horizontal interception task during locomotion. J Motor Behav 34:385–401

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath MK, Shaffer DM, Kaiser MK (1995) How baseball fielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science 268:569–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod P, Dienes Z (1993) Running to catch the ball. Nature 362:23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod P, Reed N, Dienes Z (2001) Toward a unified fielder theory: what we do not yet know about how people run to catch a ball. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1347–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montagne G, Laurent M (1994) The effects of environmental changes on one-handed catching. J Motor Behav 26:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagne G, Laurent M, Durey A, Bootsma RJ (1999) Movement reversals in ball catching. Exp Brain Res 129:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montagne G, Fraisse F, Ripoll H, Laurent M (2000) Perception-action coupling in interceptive task: first order temporal relation as an input variable. Hum Mov Sci 19:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagne G, Buekers MJ, Camachon C, De Rugy A, Laurent M (2003) The learning of goal-directed locomotion: a perception-action coupling perspective. Q J Exp Psychol A 56:551–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oudejans RRD, Michaels CF, Bakker FC, Davids K (1999) Shedding some light on catching in the dark: perceptual mechanisms for catching fly balls. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:531–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peper CE, Bootsma RJ, Mestre DR, Bakker FC (1994) Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:591–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regan D, Gray R (2000) Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement. Trends Cogn Sci 4:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren KS, Pick HL, Von Hofsten C (1988) Role of vision in ball-catching. J Motor Behav 20:150–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton SK, Wann JP (1999) Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neurosci 2:186–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton SK, Harris JM, Lloyd M, Wann JP (1998) Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Curr Biol 8:1191–1194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA, Bootsma RJ (1991) ‘Grasping’ tau. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1655–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA, Pijpers JR, Van Santvoord AAM (1993) The visual guidance of catching. Exp Brain Res 93:148–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MRH, Flach JM, Dittman SM, Stanard T (2001) Monocular optical constraints on collision control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:395–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG (2001) On specification and the senses. Behav Brain Sci 24:195–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr MJ, Warren WH (2002) Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nature Neurosci 5:1089–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tresilian JR (1999) Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? Trends Cogn Sci 3:301–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH, Kay BA, Zosh WD, Duchon AP, Sahuc S (2001) Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neurosci 4:213–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RB (2002) Adapting to virtual environments. In: Stanney K (ed) Handbook of virtual environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 619–636

  • Whiting HTA (1968) Training in a continuous ball throwing and catching task. Ergonomics 13:445–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting HTA, Sharp RH (1974) Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. J Motor Behav 6:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie RM, Wann JP (2002) Driving as night falls: the contribution of retinal flow and visual direction to the control of steering. Curr Biol 12:2014–2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and Bill Warren for their critical and insightful comments on an earlier version of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Montagne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chardenon, A., Montagne, G., Laurent, M. et al. The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation?. Exp Brain Res 158, 100–108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1880-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1880-7

Keywords

Navigation