Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Functional MRI determination of a dose-response relationship to lower extremity neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy subjects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Although empirical evidence supports the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to treat physical impairments associated with stroke, the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of this modality are poorly understood. Recent studies have employed functional imaging to investigations of brain responses to median nerve stimulation. These studies suggest a dose-response relationship may exist between selected stimulation parameters and hemodynamic responses in sensorimotor regions. However, substantial gaps exist in this literature. The present study was designed to address these deficiencies. Ten healthy subjects participated. In phase one, four stimulus intensity levels were established: (1) sensory threshold [Th], (2) (MM−Th)×0.333+Th [low-intermediate level, LI], (3) (MM−Th)×0.666+Th [high-intermediate level, HI], and (4) maximal motor (MM). In phase two, subjects were scanned using a spiral-echoplanar imaging technique at each stimulus level. Image sets were analyzed to determine hemodynamic responses at the highest Pearson correlation level (r) ascertained for each of five areas of interest (AOI): (1) primary sensory, (2) primary motor, (3) cingulate gyrus, (4) thalamus, and (5) cerebellum. ANOVA demonstrated significant main effects for BOLD signal amplitude (p<0.05) changes in all AOI. Similarly, ANOVA showed significant differences in the volume of activation (p<0.05) with increasing stimulus intensity in four AOI. Secondary analyses of pooled data showed increasing probabilities of activation at higher stimulus intensities within each AOI. Collectively, these data indicate a dose-response relationship exists between lower extremity NMES and brain activation in specific neural regions. The current results, while limited in their generalizability, are foundational for future studies of interventions using NMES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2A–D.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Heart Association (1993) Heart and stroke facts. Pamphlet

  • Backes WH, et al. (2000) Somatosensory cortex responses to median nerve stimulation: fMRI effects of current amplitude and selective attention [in process citation]. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1738–1744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer T, Staiger V, Aertsen A (1989) Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal slice cultures: local "Hebbian" conjunction of pre- and post synaptic stimulation leads to distributed synaptic enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:8113–8117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner H, et al. (1994) Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography. Brain Topogr 6:299–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chantraine A, et al. (1999) Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:328–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis KD, et al. (1995) fMRI of human somatosensory and cingulate cortex during painful electrical nerve stimulation. Neuroreport 7:321–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Gratta C, et al. (2000) Topographic organization of the human primary and secondary somatosensory areas: an fMRI study [in process citation]. Neuroreport 11:2035–2043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faghri PD, et al. (1994) The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:73–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz M, et al. (1996) Functional electrostimulation in post stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:549–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granat MH, et al. (1996) Peroneal stimulator; evaluation for the correction of spastic drop foot in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:19–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR (1975) Residual disability in survivors of stroke—the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med 293:954–956

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustard S, Fadili J, Williams EJ, Hall LD, Carpenter TA, Brett M, Bullmore ET (2001) Effect of slice orientation on reproducibility of fMRI motor activation at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging 19:1323–1331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibanez V, et al. (1995) Effects of stimulus rate on regional cerebral blood flow after median nerve stimulation. Brain 118:1339–1351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1995) Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:27–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kampe KK, Jones RA, Auer DP (2000) Frequency dependence of the functional MRI response after electrical median nerve stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 9:106–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR (1999) Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke 30:963–968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luft AR, Smith GV, Forrester L, Whitall J, Macko RF, Goldberg AP, Hanley DF (2002) Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. Hum Brain Mapp 17:131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luscher C, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC, Muller D (2000) Synaptic plasticity and dynamic modulation of the post-synaptic membrane. Nat Neurosci 3:545–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maitra R, Roys SR, Gullapolli RP (2002) Test-retest reliability estimation of functional MRI data. Magn Reson Med (in press)

  • Noll DC, Schneider W (1994) Theory, simulation, and compensation strategies of physiological motion artifacts in functional MRI. Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Image Processing 3:40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandyan AD, Granat MH, Stott DJ (1997) Effects of electrical stimulation on flexion contractures in the hemiplegic wrist. Clin Rehabil 11:123–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell J, et al. (1999) Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in post stroke hemiplegia. Stroke 30:1384–1389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonde L, et al. (1998) Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med 30:95–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel J, et al. (1999) Functional MRI of human primary somatosensory and motor cortex during median nerve stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 110:47–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Thieme Medical, New York

  • Taylor PN, et al. (1999) Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1577–1583

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeoglu Y, Adak B, Goksoy T (1998) Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index score following stroke. Clin Rehabil 12:277–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thach WT, Goodkin HP, Keating JG (1992) The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:403–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Topka H, Konczak J, Schneider K, Boose A, Dichgans J (1998) Multijoint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 119:493–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1995) Post-stroke rehabilitation: clinical practice guidelines. (AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement.

The authors wish to thank Lisa Estrada, MPT, and Matthew Lewis, MPT, for their technical assistance in the conduct of this study. Funding was provided, in part, from an NIA Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Grant (2P60AG012583–06A1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland-Baltimore, 100 Penn Street, Rm. 107, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Gerald V. Smith & Gad Alon

  2. Functional Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Maryland-Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Steven R. Roys & Rao P. Gullapalli

Authors
  1. Gerald V. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gad Alon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven R. Roys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rao P. Gullapalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald V. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, G.V., Alon, G., Roys, S.R. et al. Functional MRI determination of a dose-response relationship to lower extremity neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 150, 33–39 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1405-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1405-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation